无效通气合并慢性冠状动脉综合征或心力衰竭患者的过度通气和化疗敏感性:一项病例对照研究

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1509421
Prisca Eser, Dominic Käesermann, Pietro Calamai, Anja Kalberer, Laura Stütz, Sarina Huber, James Duffin, Matthias Wilhelm
{"title":"无效通气合并慢性冠状动脉综合征或心力衰竭患者的过度通气和化疗敏感性:一项病例对照研究","authors":"Prisca Eser, Dominic Käesermann, Pietro Calamai, Anja Kalberer, Laura Stütz, Sarina Huber, James Duffin, Matthias Wilhelm","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1509421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), increased ventilation/carbon dioxide production ( <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> <sub>E</sub>/ <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> CO<sub>2</sub>) slope has been found to predict disease progression and mortality, similarly to patients with heart failure (HF); however, increased chemosensitivity, a well-established predictor for mortality in patients with HF, has rarely been assessed in patients with CCS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients with CCS, HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF < 50%), healthy controls (45+ years), and young healthy adults (<35 years) were recruited. For patients, a <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> <sub>E</sub>/ <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> CO<sub>2</sub> slope ≥36 was an inclusion criterion. The Duffin rebreathing method was used to determine the resting end-expiratory partial pressure of carbon dioxide (P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>), ventilatory recruitment threshold (VRT), and slope (sensitivity) during a hyperoxic (150 mmHg O<sub>2</sub>) and hypoxic (50 mmHg O<sub>2</sub>) rebreathing test to determine the central and peripheral chemosensitivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with CCS, HF, controls, and young healthy adults, median <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> <sub>E</sub>/ <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> CO<sub>2</sub> slopes were 40.2, 41.3, 30.5, and 28.0, respectively. Both patient groups had similarly reduced hyperoxic VRT (at P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> 42.1 and 43.2 mmHg) compared to 46.0 and 48.8 mmHg in the control and young healthy adults. Neither hypoxic VRT nor hyper- or hypoxic slopes were significantly different in patients compared to controls. Both patient groups had lower resting P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> than controls, but only patients with HF had increased breathing frequency and rapid shallow breathing at rest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with HF and/or CCS and excess ventilation, central chemoreflex VRT was reduced independently of the presence of HF. Low VRTs were related to resting excess ventilation in patients with CCS or HF; however, rapid shallow breathing at peak exercise was present only in patients with HF.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>NCT05057884.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1509421"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Excess ventilation and chemosensitivity in patients with inefficient ventilation and chronic coronary syndrome or heart failure: a case-control study.\",\"authors\":\"Prisca Eser, Dominic Käesermann, Pietro Calamai, Anja Kalberer, Laura Stütz, Sarina Huber, James Duffin, Matthias Wilhelm\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphys.2024.1509421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), increased ventilation/carbon dioxide production ( <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> <sub>E</sub>/ <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> CO<sub>2</sub>) slope has been found to predict disease progression and mortality, similarly to patients with heart failure (HF); however, increased chemosensitivity, a well-established predictor for mortality in patients with HF, has rarely been assessed in patients with CCS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients with CCS, HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF < 50%), healthy controls (45+ years), and young healthy adults (<35 years) were recruited. For patients, a <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> <sub>E</sub>/ <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> CO<sub>2</sub> slope ≥36 was an inclusion criterion. The Duffin rebreathing method was used to determine the resting end-expiratory partial pressure of carbon dioxide (P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>), ventilatory recruitment threshold (VRT), and slope (sensitivity) during a hyperoxic (150 mmHg O<sub>2</sub>) and hypoxic (50 mmHg O<sub>2</sub>) rebreathing test to determine the central and peripheral chemosensitivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with CCS, HF, controls, and young healthy adults, median <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> <sub>E</sub>/ <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> CO<sub>2</sub> slopes were 40.2, 41.3, 30.5, and 28.0, respectively. Both patient groups had similarly reduced hyperoxic VRT (at P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> 42.1 and 43.2 mmHg) compared to 46.0 and 48.8 mmHg in the control and young healthy adults. Neither hypoxic VRT nor hyper- or hypoxic slopes were significantly different in patients compared to controls. Both patient groups had lower resting P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> than controls, but only patients with HF had increased breathing frequency and rapid shallow breathing at rest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with HF and/or CCS and excess ventilation, central chemoreflex VRT was reduced independently of the presence of HF. Low VRTs were related to resting excess ventilation in patients with CCS or HF; however, rapid shallow breathing at peak exercise was present only in patients with HF.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>NCT05057884.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1509421\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794504/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1509421\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1509421","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)患者中,已发现通气/二氧化碳生成(V˙E/ V˙CO2)斜率增加可预测疾病进展和死亡率,与心力衰竭(HF)患者相似;然而,化疗敏感性的增加是心衰患者死亡率的一个公认的预测指标,但很少在CCS患者中进行评估。方法:纳入标准为CCS患者、HF伴射血分数降低(EF < 50%)、健康对照(45岁以上)和健康青年(V˙E/ V˙CO2斜率≥36)。采用Duffin再呼吸法测定高氧(150mmhg O2)和低氧(50mmhg O2)再呼吸试验时的静息呼气末二氧化碳分压(PETCO2)、通气复吸阈值(VRT)和斜率(敏感性),以确定中枢和外周化学敏感性。结果:在CCS患者、HF患者、对照组和年轻健康成人中,中位V˙E/ V˙CO2斜率分别为40.2、41.3、30.5和28.0。两组患者的高氧VRT (PETCO2为42.1和43.2 mmHg)与对照组和年轻健康成人的46.0和48.8 mmHg相似。与对照组相比,低氧VRT、高氧或低氧斜率在患者中均无显著差异。两组患者的静息PETCO2均低于对照组,但只有HF患者的呼吸频率增加,静息时呼吸迅速浅。结论:在HF和/或CCS和过度通气的患者中,中枢化学反射性VRT的降低与HF的存在无关。低vrt与CCS或HF患者静息过度通气有关;然而,只有心衰患者在运动高峰时出现快速浅呼吸。临床试验注册号:NCT05057884。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Excess ventilation and chemosensitivity in patients with inefficient ventilation and chronic coronary syndrome or heart failure: a case-control study.

Background: In patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), increased ventilation/carbon dioxide production ( V ˙ E/ V ˙ CO2) slope has been found to predict disease progression and mortality, similarly to patients with heart failure (HF); however, increased chemosensitivity, a well-established predictor for mortality in patients with HF, has rarely been assessed in patients with CCS.

Method: Patients with CCS, HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF < 50%), healthy controls (45+ years), and young healthy adults (<35 years) were recruited. For patients, a V ˙ E/ V ˙ CO2 slope ≥36 was an inclusion criterion. The Duffin rebreathing method was used to determine the resting end-expiratory partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PETCO2), ventilatory recruitment threshold (VRT), and slope (sensitivity) during a hyperoxic (150 mmHg O2) and hypoxic (50 mmHg O2) rebreathing test to determine the central and peripheral chemosensitivity.

Results: In patients with CCS, HF, controls, and young healthy adults, median V ˙ E/ V ˙ CO2 slopes were 40.2, 41.3, 30.5, and 28.0, respectively. Both patient groups had similarly reduced hyperoxic VRT (at PETCO2 42.1 and 43.2 mmHg) compared to 46.0 and 48.8 mmHg in the control and young healthy adults. Neither hypoxic VRT nor hyper- or hypoxic slopes were significantly different in patients compared to controls. Both patient groups had lower resting PETCO2 than controls, but only patients with HF had increased breathing frequency and rapid shallow breathing at rest.

Conclusion: In patients with HF and/or CCS and excess ventilation, central chemoreflex VRT was reduced independently of the presence of HF. Low VRTs were related to resting excess ventilation in patients with CCS or HF; however, rapid shallow breathing at peak exercise was present only in patients with HF.

Clinical trial registration number: NCT05057884.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Comparative efficacy and mechanistic insights of non-invasive neuromodulation and motor rehabilitation on functional reorganization of the supplementary motor area in subacute stroke: a narrative review. Case report: Elevation variability and pacing regulation in an elite half-marathon runner: a longitudinal case study. Effects of aquatic rehabilitation on symptoms, physical function, and quality of life in individuals with knee joint dysfunction: a meta-analysis. Effects of an eight-week French contrast training program on lower-limb explosive power, acceleration, and muscle strength in male college badminton players. Efficacy and safety of estradiol/dydrogesterone combined with escitalopram in the treatment of anxiety and depression in perimenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1