医院数量和地区对髋部骨折后老年患者死亡率、医疗费用和住院时间的影响:一项全国索赔数据库分析

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.4055/cios24193
Seung Hoon Kim, Suk-Yong Jang, Yonghan Cha, Hajun Jang, Bo-Yeon Kim, Hyo-Jung Lee, Gui-Ok Kim
{"title":"医院数量和地区对髋部骨折后老年患者死亡率、医疗费用和住院时间的影响:一项全国索赔数据库分析","authors":"Seung Hoon Kim, Suk-Yong Jang, Yonghan Cha, Hajun Jang, Bo-Yeon Kim, Hyo-Jung Lee, Gui-Ok Kim","doi":"10.4055/cios24193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgroud: </strong>The purpose of our study was to analyze the effects of hospital volume and region on in-hospital and long-term mortality, direct medical costs (DMCs), and length of hospital stay (LOS) in elderly patients following hip fracture, utilizing nationwide claims data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective nationwide study sourced its subjects from the Korean National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database spanning from January 2011 to December 2018. A generalized estimating equation model with a Poisson distribution and logarithmic link function was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs to assess the association of hospital volume with in-hospital and 1-year mortality, DMCs, and LOS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 172,144 patients were included. Comparing the risk of in-hospital death between high-volume and low-volume hospitals, the risk of in-hospital death was 1.2 times higher at low-volume hospitals (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.33; <i>p</i> = 0.002). Additionally, the risk of death at 1 year was 1.05 times higher at low-volume hospitals (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09; <i>p</i> = 0.008) compared to high-volume hospitals. DMCs were 0.84 times lower at low-volume hospitals for in-hospital period (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.84-0.85; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 0.87 times lower for 1 year (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.86-0.88; <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to high-volume hospitals. In-hospital LOS was 1.21 times longer at low-volume hospitals (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.20-1.22; <i>p</i> < 0.001) than at high-volume hospitals. In addition, the risk of in-hospital death was 1.22 times higher (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.12-1.33; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and the risk of 1-year death was 1.07 times higher (aOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10; <i>p</i> < 0.001) at rural hospitals compared to urban hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians should focus on improving clinical outcomes for hip fracture patients in low-volume and rural hospital settings, with a specific emphasis on reducing mortality rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":"80-90"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Hospital Volume and Region on Mortality, Medical Costs, and Length of Hospital Stay in Elderly Patients Following Hip Fracture: A Nationwide Claims Database Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Seung Hoon Kim, Suk-Yong Jang, Yonghan Cha, Hajun Jang, Bo-Yeon Kim, Hyo-Jung Lee, Gui-Ok Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4055/cios24193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgroud: </strong>The purpose of our study was to analyze the effects of hospital volume and region on in-hospital and long-term mortality, direct medical costs (DMCs), and length of hospital stay (LOS) in elderly patients following hip fracture, utilizing nationwide claims data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective nationwide study sourced its subjects from the Korean National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database spanning from January 2011 to December 2018. A generalized estimating equation model with a Poisson distribution and logarithmic link function was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs to assess the association of hospital volume with in-hospital and 1-year mortality, DMCs, and LOS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 172,144 patients were included. Comparing the risk of in-hospital death between high-volume and low-volume hospitals, the risk of in-hospital death was 1.2 times higher at low-volume hospitals (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.33; <i>p</i> = 0.002). Additionally, the risk of death at 1 year was 1.05 times higher at low-volume hospitals (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09; <i>p</i> = 0.008) compared to high-volume hospitals. DMCs were 0.84 times lower at low-volume hospitals for in-hospital period (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.84-0.85; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 0.87 times lower for 1 year (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.86-0.88; <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to high-volume hospitals. In-hospital LOS was 1.21 times longer at low-volume hospitals (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.20-1.22; <i>p</i> < 0.001) than at high-volume hospitals. In addition, the risk of in-hospital death was 1.22 times higher (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.12-1.33; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and the risk of 1-year death was 1.07 times higher (aOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10; <i>p</i> < 0.001) at rural hospitals compared to urban hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians should focus on improving clinical outcomes for hip fracture patients in low-volume and rural hospital settings, with a specific emphasis on reducing mortality rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"80-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791489/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24193\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24193","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是利用全国范围内的理赔数据,分析医院数量和地区对老年髋部骨折患者住院和长期死亡率、直接医疗费用(DMCs)和住院时间(LOS)的影响。方法:这项回顾性全国研究的研究对象来自韩国国民健康保险审查和评估服务数据库,时间跨度为2011年1月至2018年12月。采用泊松分布和对数联系函数的广义估计方程模型来估计调整优势比(aORs)和95% ci,以评估医院容量与院内和1年死亡率、dmc和LOS的关系。结果:共纳入患者172144例。比较大容量医院和小容量医院的院内死亡风险,小容量医院的院内死亡风险高1.2倍(aOR, 1.20;95% ci, 1.07-1.33;P = 0.002)。此外,小容量医院的1年死亡风险高出1.05倍(aOR, 1.05;95% ci, 1.01-1.09;P = 0.008)。小规模医院住院期间的dmc低0.84倍(aOR, 0.84;95% ci, 0.84-0.85;p < 0.001), 1年降低0.87倍(aOR, 0.87;95% ci, 0.86-0.88;P < 0.001)。小容量医院的住院时间长1.21倍(aOR, 1.21;95% ci, 1.20-1.22;P < 0.001)。此外,住院死亡风险高出1.22倍(aOR, 1.22;95% ci, 1.12-1.33;p < 0.001), 1年死亡风险高1.07倍(aOR, 1.07;95% ci, 1.04-1.10;P < 0.001)。结论:临床医生应注重改善小容量和农村医院髋部骨折患者的临床结果,特别强调降低死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Hospital Volume and Region on Mortality, Medical Costs, and Length of Hospital Stay in Elderly Patients Following Hip Fracture: A Nationwide Claims Database Analysis.

Backgroud: The purpose of our study was to analyze the effects of hospital volume and region on in-hospital and long-term mortality, direct medical costs (DMCs), and length of hospital stay (LOS) in elderly patients following hip fracture, utilizing nationwide claims data.

Methods: This retrospective nationwide study sourced its subjects from the Korean National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database spanning from January 2011 to December 2018. A generalized estimating equation model with a Poisson distribution and logarithmic link function was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs to assess the association of hospital volume with in-hospital and 1-year mortality, DMCs, and LOS.

Results: A total of 172,144 patients were included. Comparing the risk of in-hospital death between high-volume and low-volume hospitals, the risk of in-hospital death was 1.2 times higher at low-volume hospitals (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.33; p = 0.002). Additionally, the risk of death at 1 year was 1.05 times higher at low-volume hospitals (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09; p = 0.008) compared to high-volume hospitals. DMCs were 0.84 times lower at low-volume hospitals for in-hospital period (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.84-0.85; p < 0.001) and 0.87 times lower for 1 year (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.86-0.88; p < 0.001) compared to high-volume hospitals. In-hospital LOS was 1.21 times longer at low-volume hospitals (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.20-1.22; p < 0.001) than at high-volume hospitals. In addition, the risk of in-hospital death was 1.22 times higher (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.12-1.33; p < 0.001) and the risk of 1-year death was 1.07 times higher (aOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10; p < 0.001) at rural hospitals compared to urban hospitals.

Conclusions: Clinicians should focus on improving clinical outcomes for hip fracture patients in low-volume and rural hospital settings, with a specific emphasis on reducing mortality rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Arthroscopic Reduction and Fixation of Coronoid Fracture with Screws and Modified Pull Out Configuration. An Anatomical Study to Ensure Precise Percutaneous Release of the Annular Pulley in the Trigger Finger. A Smaller Posterior Tibial Slope May Be Associated with an Increased Risk of Tears in the Anterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus. Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following Reverse Sural Flap of Lower Extremity Defects: A Comparative Retrospective Study. Delta Neutrophil Index as an Early Screening and Prognostic Marker for Revision after Non-traumatic Below-Knee Amputation: A Hospital-Based Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1