Ronan J Knittel, Nathan T Harvey, Nima Mesbah Ardakani, Blake O'Brien, Stephen Lee, Benjamin A Wood
{"title":"prame阳性的普通黑素细胞痣的临床病理特征:一项病例对照研究。","authors":"Ronan J Knittel, Nathan T Harvey, Nima Mesbah Ardakani, Blake O'Brien, Stephen Lee, Benjamin A Wood","doi":"10.1097/DAD.0000000000002932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry has been found to be relatively sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of melanoma, although the detection of PRAME positivity in some melanocytic nevi is a significant limitation. This study was designed to investigate the features of common melanocytic nevi showing PRAME staining, encountered in routine community practice. We reviewed all pathology reports on common melanocytic nevi seen in routine practice for a 1-month period and found that 7.1% of nevi stained with PRAME were considered positive by the original reporting pathologist. A total of 41 PRAME-positive nevi (representing 4.7% of nevi) and a control group of 43 PRAME-negative nevi collected during the same period were identified. The histologic features were reviewed, and the diagnosis and PRAME staining were recorded in a masked fashion by 3 dermatopathologists. Our results suggest that caution is warranted in the interpretation of PRAME in the assessment of small lentiginous melanocytic nevi with a low level of suspicion for melanoma, because these are not infrequently PRAME positive. We found a statistically significant association between the presence of solar elastosis and lentiginous growth pattern, and PRAME status ( P < 0.01). When comparing the original diagnosis with the reviewer's diagnosis, the original diagnosis was severely atypical in 54% of PRAME-positive cases, while only 7% were considered to show severe atypia on review masked to PRAME status ( P < 0.001). There was no such discrepancy among PRAME-negative cases (9% vs. 19%, considered severely atypical). This finding provides evidence of a \"PRAME bias\" in the interpretation of melanocytic lesions with no or mild atypia, whereby such lesions are classified as severely atypical when PRAME is positive, likely with the intention of prompting re-excision.</p>","PeriodicalId":50967,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Dermatopathology","volume":" ","pages":"379-386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicopathologic Features of PRAME-Positive Common Melanocytic Nevi: A Case-Control Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ronan J Knittel, Nathan T Harvey, Nima Mesbah Ardakani, Blake O'Brien, Stephen Lee, Benjamin A Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DAD.0000000000002932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry has been found to be relatively sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of melanoma, although the detection of PRAME positivity in some melanocytic nevi is a significant limitation. This study was designed to investigate the features of common melanocytic nevi showing PRAME staining, encountered in routine community practice. We reviewed all pathology reports on common melanocytic nevi seen in routine practice for a 1-month period and found that 7.1% of nevi stained with PRAME were considered positive by the original reporting pathologist. A total of 41 PRAME-positive nevi (representing 4.7% of nevi) and a control group of 43 PRAME-negative nevi collected during the same period were identified. The histologic features were reviewed, and the diagnosis and PRAME staining were recorded in a masked fashion by 3 dermatopathologists. Our results suggest that caution is warranted in the interpretation of PRAME in the assessment of small lentiginous melanocytic nevi with a low level of suspicion for melanoma, because these are not infrequently PRAME positive. We found a statistically significant association between the presence of solar elastosis and lentiginous growth pattern, and PRAME status ( P < 0.01). When comparing the original diagnosis with the reviewer's diagnosis, the original diagnosis was severely atypical in 54% of PRAME-positive cases, while only 7% were considered to show severe atypia on review masked to PRAME status ( P < 0.001). There was no such discrepancy among PRAME-negative cases (9% vs. 19%, considered severely atypical). This finding provides evidence of a \\\"PRAME bias\\\" in the interpretation of melanocytic lesions with no or mild atypia, whereby such lesions are classified as severely atypical when PRAME is positive, likely with the intention of prompting re-excision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Dermatopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"379-386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Dermatopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DAD.0000000000002932\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Dermatopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DAD.0000000000002932","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:黑色素瘤优先表达抗原(PRAME)免疫组化对黑色素瘤的诊断具有相对的敏感性和特异性,尽管在某些黑素细胞痣中检测PRAME阳性存在明显的局限性。本研究旨在探讨在常规社区实践中遇到的PRAME染色的常见黑素细胞痣的特征。我们回顾了在1个月的常规实践中看到的所有常见黑素细胞痣的病理报告,发现7.1%的PRAME染色痣被原始报告的病理学家认为是阳性的。共鉴定了41例pram阳性痣(占痣的4.7%)和同期收集的43例pram阴性痣的对照组。回顾组织学特征,并由3名皮肤病理学家以蒙面方式记录诊断和PRAME染色。我们的研究结果表明,在评估小的色斑性黑素细胞痣时,对PRAME的解释有必要谨慎,因为这些痣通常是PRAME阳性的。我们发现太阳弹性和晶状体生长模式的存在与PRAME状态有统计学意义的关联(P < 0.01)。将原始诊断与审稿人的诊断进行比较,54%的PRAME阳性病例的原始诊断为严重非典型,而只有7%的PRAME状态被认为显示严重非典型(P < 0.001)。在prame阴性病例中没有这种差异(9% vs. 19%,被认为是严重非典型)。这一发现提供了“PRAME偏倚”的证据,在解释无或轻度非典型的黑素细胞病变时,当PRAME阳性时,这类病变被归类为严重非典型,可能是为了提示再次切除。
Clinicopathologic Features of PRAME-Positive Common Melanocytic Nevi: A Case-Control Study.
Abstract: Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry has been found to be relatively sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of melanoma, although the detection of PRAME positivity in some melanocytic nevi is a significant limitation. This study was designed to investigate the features of common melanocytic nevi showing PRAME staining, encountered in routine community practice. We reviewed all pathology reports on common melanocytic nevi seen in routine practice for a 1-month period and found that 7.1% of nevi stained with PRAME were considered positive by the original reporting pathologist. A total of 41 PRAME-positive nevi (representing 4.7% of nevi) and a control group of 43 PRAME-negative nevi collected during the same period were identified. The histologic features were reviewed, and the diagnosis and PRAME staining were recorded in a masked fashion by 3 dermatopathologists. Our results suggest that caution is warranted in the interpretation of PRAME in the assessment of small lentiginous melanocytic nevi with a low level of suspicion for melanoma, because these are not infrequently PRAME positive. We found a statistically significant association between the presence of solar elastosis and lentiginous growth pattern, and PRAME status ( P < 0.01). When comparing the original diagnosis with the reviewer's diagnosis, the original diagnosis was severely atypical in 54% of PRAME-positive cases, while only 7% were considered to show severe atypia on review masked to PRAME status ( P < 0.001). There was no such discrepancy among PRAME-negative cases (9% vs. 19%, considered severely atypical). This finding provides evidence of a "PRAME bias" in the interpretation of melanocytic lesions with no or mild atypia, whereby such lesions are classified as severely atypical when PRAME is positive, likely with the intention of prompting re-excision.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Dermatopathology offers outstanding coverage of the latest diagnostic approaches and laboratory techniques, as well as insights into contemporary social, legal, and ethical concerns. Each issue features review articles on clinical, technical, and basic science advances and illuminating, detailed case reports.
With the The American Journal of Dermatopathology you''ll be able to:
-Incorporate step-by-step coverage of new or difficult-to-diagnose conditions from their earliest histopathologic signs to confirmatory immunohistochemical and molecular studies.
-Apply the latest basic science findings and clinical approaches to your work right away.
-Tap into the skills and expertise of your peers and colleagues the world over peer-reviewed original articles, "Extraordinary cases reports", coverage of practical guidelines, and graphic presentations.
-Expand your horizons through the Journal''s idea-generating forum for debating controversial issues and learning from preeminent researchers and clinicians