与异丙酚相比,七氟醚降低了布比卡因对兔的心脏毒性:一项使用早期心电图检测和测量毒性血浆浓度的实验研究。

IF 2.3 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesiology intensive therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5114/ait.2024.145167
Nataliia Semenko, Iurii Kuchyn, Michael Frank, Kateryna Bielka, Demyd Milokhov, Olga Korshun
{"title":"与异丙酚相比,七氟醚降低了布比卡因对兔的心脏毒性:一项使用早期心电图检测和测量毒性血浆浓度的实验研究。","authors":"Nataliia Semenko, Iurii Kuchyn, Michael Frank, Kateryna Bielka, Demyd Milokhov, Olga Korshun","doi":"10.5114/ait.2024.145167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of both propofol and sevoflurane on bupivacaine cardiac toxi-city has not been conclusively defined. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of propofol vs sevoflurane general anesthesia (GA) on bupivacaine-induced arrhyth-mias.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ten rabbits were randomized to two groups: propofol- or sevoflurane-based GA. At the maintenance stage of anesthesia heart rate and QRS/QT durations were recorded as \"baseline\" and an intravenous (i.v.) bupivacaine 0.25% infusion at the rate of 1.0 mg kg -1 min -1 was initiated. Blood samples were obtained when predefined electrocardiographic (ECG) changes were observed and when the heart rate (HR) reached 75%, 50%, and 25% of the baseline and 0 bpm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean time to first predefined ECG changes was 131 ± 25.02 s for the propofol group and 223 ± 34.11 s for the sevoflurane group ( P = 0.001). Time of progression of bradycardia in both groups was evaluated as a percentage of the initial HR for the understanding of the dynamics of changes during the local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST). The 25% HR time was shorter for the propofol group (480 ± 117 vs. 673 ± 146 s, P = 0.05). Time to asystole was shorter in the propofol group (110.7 ± 22.22 vs. 226.6 ± 98.61 s, P = 0.047). Mean serum bupivacaine concentration was lower for the propofol group during the occurrence of the first ECG changes (2.542 ± 1.415 vs. 6.997 ± 2.197 mg mL -1 , P = 0.005) and asystole (110.7 ± 22.22 vs. 226.6 ± 98.61 mg mL -1 , P = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It seems that sevoflurane-, but not propofol-based anesthesia reduces the risk of LAST during GA combined with peripheral nerve blocks. Sevoflurane-based anesthesia may protect the myocardium from the toxic effects of bupivacaine.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"56 4","pages":"224-230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sevoflurane reduces the cardiac toxicity of bupivacaine compared with propofol in rabbits: an experimental study using early electrocardiographic detection and measurement of toxic plasma concentration.\",\"authors\":\"Nataliia Semenko, Iurii Kuchyn, Michael Frank, Kateryna Bielka, Demyd Milokhov, Olga Korshun\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/ait.2024.145167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of both propofol and sevoflurane on bupivacaine cardiac toxi-city has not been conclusively defined. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of propofol vs sevoflurane general anesthesia (GA) on bupivacaine-induced arrhyth-mias.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ten rabbits were randomized to two groups: propofol- or sevoflurane-based GA. At the maintenance stage of anesthesia heart rate and QRS/QT durations were recorded as \\\"baseline\\\" and an intravenous (i.v.) bupivacaine 0.25% infusion at the rate of 1.0 mg kg -1 min -1 was initiated. Blood samples were obtained when predefined electrocardiographic (ECG) changes were observed and when the heart rate (HR) reached 75%, 50%, and 25% of the baseline and 0 bpm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean time to first predefined ECG changes was 131 ± 25.02 s for the propofol group and 223 ± 34.11 s for the sevoflurane group ( P = 0.001). Time of progression of bradycardia in both groups was evaluated as a percentage of the initial HR for the understanding of the dynamics of changes during the local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST). The 25% HR time was shorter for the propofol group (480 ± 117 vs. 673 ± 146 s, P = 0.05). Time to asystole was shorter in the propofol group (110.7 ± 22.22 vs. 226.6 ± 98.61 s, P = 0.047). Mean serum bupivacaine concentration was lower for the propofol group during the occurrence of the first ECG changes (2.542 ± 1.415 vs. 6.997 ± 2.197 mg mL -1 , P = 0.005) and asystole (110.7 ± 22.22 vs. 226.6 ± 98.61 mg mL -1 , P = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It seems that sevoflurane-, but not propofol-based anesthesia reduces the risk of LAST during GA combined with peripheral nerve blocks. Sevoflurane-based anesthesia may protect the myocardium from the toxic effects of bupivacaine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy\",\"volume\":\"56 4\",\"pages\":\"224-230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736912/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2024.145167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2024.145167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:异丙酚和七氟醚对布比卡因心脏毒性的影响还没有明确的定义。本研究的目的是探讨异丙酚与七氟醚全身麻醉(GA)对布比卡因诱导的心律失常的影响。材料和方法:10只家兔随机分为两组:异丙酚组和七氟醚组。在麻醉维持阶段,心率和QRS/QT持续时间被记录为“基线”,并开始以1.0 mg kg -1 min -1的速率静脉输注0.25%的布比卡因。当观察到预先设定的心电图(ECG)变化,以及心率(HR)达到基线的75%、50%和25%以及bpm为0时,采集血液样本。结果:异丙酚组和七氟醚组首次心电图改变的平均时间分别为131±25.02 s和223±34.11 s (P = 0.001)。两组的心动过缓进展时间以初始HR的百分比进行评估,以了解局麻全身毒性(LAST)期间变化的动态。异丙酚组25% HR时间较短(480±117 vs 673±146 s, P = 0.05)。异丙酚组止搏时间较异丙酚组短(110.7±22.22 s∶226.6±98.61 s, P = 0.047)。异丙酚组首次心电图改变时布比卡因平均血清浓度较低(2.542±1.415∶6.997±2.197 mg mL -1, P = 0.005),无骤停时布比卡因平均血清浓度较低(110.7±22.22∶226.6±98.61 mg mL -1, P = 0.047)。结论:七氟醚麻醉,而非异丙酚麻醉,似乎降低了GA合并周围神经阻滞时LAST的风险。以七氟醚为基础的麻醉可以保护心肌免受布比卡因的毒性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sevoflurane reduces the cardiac toxicity of bupivacaine compared with propofol in rabbits: an experimental study using early electrocardiographic detection and measurement of toxic plasma concentration.

Background: The effect of both propofol and sevoflurane on bupivacaine cardiac toxi-city has not been conclusively defined. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of propofol vs sevoflurane general anesthesia (GA) on bupivacaine-induced arrhyth-mias.

Material and methods: Ten rabbits were randomized to two groups: propofol- or sevoflurane-based GA. At the maintenance stage of anesthesia heart rate and QRS/QT durations were recorded as "baseline" and an intravenous (i.v.) bupivacaine 0.25% infusion at the rate of 1.0 mg kg -1 min -1 was initiated. Blood samples were obtained when predefined electrocardiographic (ECG) changes were observed and when the heart rate (HR) reached 75%, 50%, and 25% of the baseline and 0 bpm.

Results: The mean time to first predefined ECG changes was 131 ± 25.02 s for the propofol group and 223 ± 34.11 s for the sevoflurane group ( P = 0.001). Time of progression of bradycardia in both groups was evaluated as a percentage of the initial HR for the understanding of the dynamics of changes during the local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST). The 25% HR time was shorter for the propofol group (480 ± 117 vs. 673 ± 146 s, P = 0.05). Time to asystole was shorter in the propofol group (110.7 ± 22.22 vs. 226.6 ± 98.61 s, P = 0.047). Mean serum bupivacaine concentration was lower for the propofol group during the occurrence of the first ECG changes (2.542 ± 1.415 vs. 6.997 ± 2.197 mg mL -1 , P = 0.005) and asystole (110.7 ± 22.22 vs. 226.6 ± 98.61 mg mL -1 , P = 0.047).

Conclusions: It seems that sevoflurane-, but not propofol-based anesthesia reduces the risk of LAST during GA combined with peripheral nerve blocks. Sevoflurane-based anesthesia may protect the myocardium from the toxic effects of bupivacaine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Consensus statement of the Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy Section of the Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy on the use of VV ECMO in paediatric patients for the treatment of acute respiratory failure. Exploration of tracheal tube contact pressure and simplified risk indicators for postoperative laryngopharyngeal discomfort: a prospective pilot study. N-ethyl-pentedrone poisoning as a cause of serotonin syndrome and gastrointestinal bleeding: a case report and literature review. Femoral artery cannulation for arterial pressure measurement in the intensive care unit: current evidence and description of the technique. Failure of tracheal tube removal after surgery: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1