Kenneth B Gordon, Joseph F Merola, Peter Foley, Olivia Choi, Daphne Chan, Megan Miller, Yin You, Yaung-Kaung Shen, Hetal V Patel, Andrew Blauvelt
{"title":"guelkumab对银屑病严重程度和治疗史的疗效:VOYAGE 1和2事后分析。","authors":"Kenneth B Gordon, Joseph F Merola, Peter Foley, Olivia Choi, Daphne Chan, Megan Miller, Yin You, Yaung-Kaung Shen, Hetal V Patel, Andrew Blauvelt","doi":"10.36849/JDD.8344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pivotal Phase 3 VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 studies established the robust efficacy and safety of guselkumab for up to 5 years in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Here, the long-term efficacy of guselkumab by baseline disease severity and treatment history was analyzed using pooled data from the VOYAGE studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomized to guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks, placebo with week 16 crossover to guselkumab, or adalimumab with week 52 crossover to guselkumab (VOYAGE 1) or week 28-76 randomized withdrawal/re-treatment (VOYAGE 2); all patients then received open-label guselkumab through week 252. These post hoc analyses evaluated the Investigator’s Global Assessment of cleared/minimal (IGA 0/1) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 responses from week 100-252 by baseline PASI (<20/≥20), IGA (=3/=4), body surface area (BSA; <20%/≥20%), and prior psoriasis treatments. Analyses used observed data after applying treatment failure rules.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At all assessment timepoints from weeks 100-252, response rates were similar by baseline PASI <20 vs ≥20 (IGA 0/1: 82.0%-85.4% vs 81.1%-81.4%; PASI 90: 78.6%-81.1% vs 81.4%-83.8%), IGA=3 vs =4 (IGA 0/1: 82.7%-85.4% vs 77.6%-79.0%; PASI 90: 79.1%-82.7% vs 79.7%-82.9%), BSA <20% vs ≥20% (IGA 0/1: 82.5%-86.2% vs 81.1%-82.6%; PASI 90: 80.4%-82.7% vs 79.1%-82.0%), prior phototherapy no vs yes (IGA 0/1: 81.7%-84.3% vs 81.5%-83.8%; PASI 90: 82.2%-84.0% vs 77.5%-81.1%), prior nonbiologic use no vs yes (IGA 0/1: 81.1%-84.5% vs 81.9%-84.1%; PASI 90: 80.9%-83.0% vs 79.0%-82.0%), and prior biologic use no vs yes (IGA 0/1: 83.2%-85.3% vs 75.3%-79.5%; PASI 90: 82.2%-83.8% vs 71.2%-76.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Durable guselkumab efficacy was sustained through 5 years of treatment among patient subpopulations irrespective of baseline disease severity or prior treatment history. J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(2):196-202. doi:10.36849/JDD.8344.</p>","PeriodicalId":15566,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","volume":"24 2","pages":"196-202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guselkumab Efficacy by Psoriasis Disease Severity and Treatment History: VOYAGE 1 and 2 Post Hoc Analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth B Gordon, Joseph F Merola, Peter Foley, Olivia Choi, Daphne Chan, Megan Miller, Yin You, Yaung-Kaung Shen, Hetal V Patel, Andrew Blauvelt\",\"doi\":\"10.36849/JDD.8344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pivotal Phase 3 VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 studies established the robust efficacy and safety of guselkumab for up to 5 years in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Here, the long-term efficacy of guselkumab by baseline disease severity and treatment history was analyzed using pooled data from the VOYAGE studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomized to guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks, placebo with week 16 crossover to guselkumab, or adalimumab with week 52 crossover to guselkumab (VOYAGE 1) or week 28-76 randomized withdrawal/re-treatment (VOYAGE 2); all patients then received open-label guselkumab through week 252. These post hoc analyses evaluated the Investigator’s Global Assessment of cleared/minimal (IGA 0/1) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 responses from week 100-252 by baseline PASI (<20/≥20), IGA (=3/=4), body surface area (BSA; <20%/≥20%), and prior psoriasis treatments. Analyses used observed data after applying treatment failure rules.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At all assessment timepoints from weeks 100-252, response rates were similar by baseline PASI <20 vs ≥20 (IGA 0/1: 82.0%-85.4% vs 81.1%-81.4%; PASI 90: 78.6%-81.1% vs 81.4%-83.8%), IGA=3 vs =4 (IGA 0/1: 82.7%-85.4% vs 77.6%-79.0%; PASI 90: 79.1%-82.7% vs 79.7%-82.9%), BSA <20% vs ≥20% (IGA 0/1: 82.5%-86.2% vs 81.1%-82.6%; PASI 90: 80.4%-82.7% vs 79.1%-82.0%), prior phototherapy no vs yes (IGA 0/1: 81.7%-84.3% vs 81.5%-83.8%; PASI 90: 82.2%-84.0% vs 77.5%-81.1%), prior nonbiologic use no vs yes (IGA 0/1: 81.1%-84.5% vs 81.9%-84.1%; PASI 90: 80.9%-83.0% vs 79.0%-82.0%), and prior biologic use no vs yes (IGA 0/1: 83.2%-85.3% vs 75.3%-79.5%; PASI 90: 82.2%-83.8% vs 71.2%-76.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Durable guselkumab efficacy was sustained through 5 years of treatment among patient subpopulations irrespective of baseline disease severity or prior treatment history. J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(2):196-202. doi:10.36849/JDD.8344.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"196-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.8344\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.8344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:关键的3期研究VOYAGE 1和VOYAGE 2确立了guselkumab对中重度牛皮癣患者长达5年的强大疗效和安全性。在这里,根据基线疾病严重程度和治疗史,使用来自VOYAGE研究的汇总数据分析了guselkumab的长期疗效。方法:患者随机接受每8周100 mg的固塞库单抗、安慰剂组(第16周与固塞库单抗交叉)或阿达木单抗组(第52周与固塞库单抗交叉)(VOYAGE 1)或第28-76周随机停药/再治疗组(VOYAGE 2);然后所有患者在第252周接受开放标签的guselkumab治疗。这些事后分析通过基线PASI (<20/≥20)、IGA(=3/=4)、体表面积(BSA, BSA, BSA)评估了100-252周研究者清除/最小化(IGA 0/1)和银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI) 90反应的总体评估。<20%/≥20%),既往牛皮癣治疗。应用治疗失败规则后使用观察数据进行分析。结果:在100-252周的所有评估时间点,缓解率与基线PASI <;20 vs &ge;20相似(IGA 0/1: 82.0%-85.4% vs 81.1%-81.4%;PASI 90: 78.6% -81.1% vs 81.4% -83.8%)、IGA vs = 4 = 3 (IGA 0/1: 82.7% -85.4% vs 77.6% -79.0%;PASI 90: 79.1% -82.7% vs 79.7% -82.9%), BSA & lt; 20% vs通用电气,20% (IGA 0/1: 82.5% -86.2% vs 81.1% -82.6%;PASI 90: 80.4%-82.7% vs 79.1%-82.0%),既往光疗否vs有(IGA 0/1: 81.7%-84.3% vs 81.5%-83.8%;PASI 90: 82.2%-84.0% vs 77.5%-81.1%),既往非生物用药否vs有(IGA 0/1: 81.1%-84.5% vs 81.9%-84.1%;PASI 90: 80.9%-83.0% vs 79.0%-82.0%),既往生物用药否vs有(IGA 0/1: 83.2%-85.3% vs 75.3%-79.5%;PASI 90: 82.2%-83.8% vs . 71.2%-76.3%)。结论:无论基线疾病严重程度或既往治疗史如何,持久的guselkumab疗效在患者亚群中持续了5年。皮肤医学杂志,2025;24(2):196-202。doi: 10.36849 / JDD.8344。
Guselkumab Efficacy by Psoriasis Disease Severity and Treatment History: VOYAGE 1 and 2 Post Hoc Analyses.
Background: The pivotal Phase 3 VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 studies established the robust efficacy and safety of guselkumab for up to 5 years in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Here, the long-term efficacy of guselkumab by baseline disease severity and treatment history was analyzed using pooled data from the VOYAGE studies.
Methods: Patients were randomized to guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks, placebo with week 16 crossover to guselkumab, or adalimumab with week 52 crossover to guselkumab (VOYAGE 1) or week 28-76 randomized withdrawal/re-treatment (VOYAGE 2); all patients then received open-label guselkumab through week 252. These post hoc analyses evaluated the Investigator’s Global Assessment of cleared/minimal (IGA 0/1) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 responses from week 100-252 by baseline PASI (<20/≥20), IGA (=3/=4), body surface area (BSA; <20%/≥20%), and prior psoriasis treatments. Analyses used observed data after applying treatment failure rules.
Results: At all assessment timepoints from weeks 100-252, response rates were similar by baseline PASI <20 vs ≥20 (IGA 0/1: 82.0%-85.4% vs 81.1%-81.4%; PASI 90: 78.6%-81.1% vs 81.4%-83.8%), IGA=3 vs =4 (IGA 0/1: 82.7%-85.4% vs 77.6%-79.0%; PASI 90: 79.1%-82.7% vs 79.7%-82.9%), BSA <20% vs ≥20% (IGA 0/1: 82.5%-86.2% vs 81.1%-82.6%; PASI 90: 80.4%-82.7% vs 79.1%-82.0%), prior phototherapy no vs yes (IGA 0/1: 81.7%-84.3% vs 81.5%-83.8%; PASI 90: 82.2%-84.0% vs 77.5%-81.1%), prior nonbiologic use no vs yes (IGA 0/1: 81.1%-84.5% vs 81.9%-84.1%; PASI 90: 80.9%-83.0% vs 79.0%-82.0%), and prior biologic use no vs yes (IGA 0/1: 83.2%-85.3% vs 75.3%-79.5%; PASI 90: 82.2%-83.8% vs 71.2%-76.3%).
Conclusions: Durable guselkumab efficacy was sustained through 5 years of treatment among patient subpopulations irrespective of baseline disease severity or prior treatment history. J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(2):196-202. doi:10.36849/JDD.8344.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Drugs in Dermatology (JDD) is a peer-reviewed publication indexed with MEDLINE®/PubMed® that was founded by the renowned Dr. Perry Robins MD. Founded in 2002, it offers one of the fastest routes to disseminate dermatologic information and is considered the fastest growing publication in dermatology.
We present original articles, award-winning case reports, and timely features pertaining to new methods, techniques, drug therapy, and devices in dermatology that provide readers with peer reviewed content of the utmost quality.
Our high standards of content are maintained through a balanced, peer-review process. Articles are reviewed by an International Editorial Board of over 160 renowned experts.