利用严格性和生命周期思维促进卫生技术监管的环境可持续性。

IF 2.7 Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf017
Alexander Cimprich, Gillian Parker, Fiona A Miller, Steven B Young
{"title":"利用严格性和生命周期思维促进卫生技术监管的环境可持续性。","authors":"Alexander Cimprich, Gillian Parker, Fiona A Miller, Steven B Young","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regulatory actors, particularly market authorization agencies, health technology assessment agencies, and health care procurement agencies, exert a powerful influence on the adoption and use of health technologies (eg, medicines and medical devices). With health care being responsible, directly and indirectly, for an estimated 4.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions, alongside other environmental harms, these actors have recognized the need to address the environmental impacts of health technologies. In this commentary, we utilize concepts of regulatory stringency and lifecycle thinking, considering scope, prescriptiveness, and performance requirements, to analyze recent efforts to incorporate environmental sustainability into the regulation of medicines and medical devices. While we acknowledge recent progress, we argue that there is significant, untapped potential for developing more fulsome and effective regulatory mechanisms to improve the environmental sustainability of health technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 2","pages":"qxaf017"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11797384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging stringency and lifecycle thinking to advance environmental sustainability in health technology regulation.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Cimprich, Gillian Parker, Fiona A Miller, Steven B Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxaf017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Regulatory actors, particularly market authorization agencies, health technology assessment agencies, and health care procurement agencies, exert a powerful influence on the adoption and use of health technologies (eg, medicines and medical devices). With health care being responsible, directly and indirectly, for an estimated 4.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions, alongside other environmental harms, these actors have recognized the need to address the environmental impacts of health technologies. In this commentary, we utilize concepts of regulatory stringency and lifecycle thinking, considering scope, prescriptiveness, and performance requirements, to analyze recent efforts to incorporate environmental sustainability into the regulation of medicines and medical devices. While we acknowledge recent progress, we argue that there is significant, untapped potential for developing more fulsome and effective regulatory mechanisms to improve the environmental sustainability of health technologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"qxaf017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11797384/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

监管行为体,特别是市场授权机构、卫生技术评估机构和卫生保健采购机构,对卫生技术(如药品和医疗装置)的采用和使用具有强大的影响力。由于卫生保健直接和间接造成了约4.6%的全球温室气体排放,加上其他环境危害,这些行为体已经认识到有必要解决卫生技术对环境的影响。在本评论中,我们利用监管严格性和生命周期思维的概念,考虑范围、规范性和性能要求,分析最近将环境可持续性纳入药品和医疗器械监管的努力。虽然我们承认最近取得的进展,但我们认为,在制定更充分和有效的监管机制以改善卫生技术的环境可持续性方面,存在巨大的未开发潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Leveraging stringency and lifecycle thinking to advance environmental sustainability in health technology regulation.

Regulatory actors, particularly market authorization agencies, health technology assessment agencies, and health care procurement agencies, exert a powerful influence on the adoption and use of health technologies (eg, medicines and medical devices). With health care being responsible, directly and indirectly, for an estimated 4.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions, alongside other environmental harms, these actors have recognized the need to address the environmental impacts of health technologies. In this commentary, we utilize concepts of regulatory stringency and lifecycle thinking, considering scope, prescriptiveness, and performance requirements, to analyze recent efforts to incorporate environmental sustainability into the regulation of medicines and medical devices. While we acknowledge recent progress, we argue that there is significant, untapped potential for developing more fulsome and effective regulatory mechanisms to improve the environmental sustainability of health technologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reporting rates of topped-out merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS) quality measures, 2017-2023. Racial disparities in drug toxicology testing among pregnant women & infants: a meta-analysis and systematic review. The changing Part D landscape. A practitioner's guide to using data on private equity hospital acquisitions. Workplace violence against nurses is a patient safety crisis, not "part of the job".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1