自体浓缩血小板单独作为移植材料或与骨移植材料在上颌窦增强中的作用:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical Oral Investigations Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1007/s00784-025-06198-4
Shanen Xie, Yan Zhang, Guochen Wen, Hao Qu, Wei Dong
{"title":"自体浓缩血小板单独作为移植材料或与骨移植材料在上颌窦增强中的作用:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。","authors":"Shanen Xie, Yan Zhang, Guochen Wen, Hao Qu, Wei Dong","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06198-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared the effectiveness of adding autologous platelet concentrates (APCs(+)) and sole bone grafting procedures (APCs(-)) in maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from electronic database and clinical registers published up to June 1, 2024. Six evaluation indices comprising percentage of new bone formation (NBF%), percentage of residual bone substitute (RBS%), percentage of fibrous tissue (FT%), implant stability quotient (ISQ), bone height (BH) and bone density (BD) were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 14 studies involving 268 lifted sinuses and 119 implants. Compared with the APCs(-) group, the APCs(+) group demonstrated a significant advantage regarding NBF% (weight mean difference (MD)= 4.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.82,8.32), p=0.007) and RBS% (MD=-4.48, 95% CI (-6.01,2.96), p<0.01), with no evident superiority in FT% (MD=-0.11, 95% CI (-0.56,0.35), p=0.64), ISQ (MD=-1.68, 95% CI (-6.77,3.40), p=0.52) and BH (standard mean difference (SMD) =-0.11, 95% CI (-3.04,2.83), p=0.94). While APCs(-) group showed a significant benefit in BD compared to the APCs(+) group (MD=-28.34, 95% CI (-48.98,-7.71), p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with APCs(-), APCs(+) could be a better option for promoting NBF% and reducing RBS%, whereas we found no evident influence in FT% and ISQ under MSA. Concerning BD and BH results, there were no additional effects with the addition of APCs, which needs to be treated with caution due to the limited number of studies.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>APCs(+) procedures show promising results, with a higher NBF% and lower RBS%, making them a potential routine MSA strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 2","pages":"120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of autologous platelet concentrates as solely grafting material or with bone graft materials in maxillary sinus augmentation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Shanen Xie, Yan Zhang, Guochen Wen, Hao Qu, Wei Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00784-025-06198-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared the effectiveness of adding autologous platelet concentrates (APCs(+)) and sole bone grafting procedures (APCs(-)) in maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from electronic database and clinical registers published up to June 1, 2024. Six evaluation indices comprising percentage of new bone formation (NBF%), percentage of residual bone substitute (RBS%), percentage of fibrous tissue (FT%), implant stability quotient (ISQ), bone height (BH) and bone density (BD) were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 14 studies involving 268 lifted sinuses and 119 implants. Compared with the APCs(-) group, the APCs(+) group demonstrated a significant advantage regarding NBF% (weight mean difference (MD)= 4.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.82,8.32), p=0.007) and RBS% (MD=-4.48, 95% CI (-6.01,2.96), p<0.01), with no evident superiority in FT% (MD=-0.11, 95% CI (-0.56,0.35), p=0.64), ISQ (MD=-1.68, 95% CI (-6.77,3.40), p=0.52) and BH (standard mean difference (SMD) =-0.11, 95% CI (-3.04,2.83), p=0.94). While APCs(-) group showed a significant benefit in BD compared to the APCs(+) group (MD=-28.34, 95% CI (-48.98,-7.71), p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with APCs(-), APCs(+) could be a better option for promoting NBF% and reducing RBS%, whereas we found no evident influence in FT% and ISQ under MSA. Concerning BD and BH results, there were no additional effects with the addition of APCs, which needs to be treated with caution due to the limited number of studies.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>APCs(+) procedures show promising results, with a higher NBF% and lower RBS%, making them a potential routine MSA strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06198-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06198-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究比较了添加自体浓缩血小板(APCs(+))和底骨移植(APCs(-))在上颌窦增强术(MSA)中的效果。材料和方法:系统检索截至2024年6月1日发表的电子数据库和临床登记册中的随机对照试验(rct)。确定了新骨形成率(NBF%)、残余骨替代物率(RBS%)、纤维组织率(FT%)、种植体稳定性商(ISQ)、骨高(BH)和骨密度(BD) 6项评价指标。结果:我们分析了14项研究,涉及268例提升鼻窦和119例植入物。与APCs(-)组相比,APCs(+)组在NBF%(体重平均差(MD)= 4.80, 95%可信区间(CI) (1.82,8.32), p=0.007)和RBS% (MD=-4.48, 95% CI(-6.01,2.96))方面表现出显著优势。结论:与APCs(-)组相比,APCs(+)组可以更好地提高NBF%和降低RBS%,而我们发现MSA下APCs(+)组对FT%和ISQ没有明显影响。关于BD和BH的结果,apc的加入没有额外的影响,由于研究数量有限,需要谨慎对待。临床相关性:APCs(+)手术显示出良好的结果,具有较高的NBF%和较低的RBS%,使其成为潜在的常规MSA策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of autologous platelet concentrates as solely grafting material or with bone graft materials in maxillary sinus augmentation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Objectives: This study compared the effectiveness of adding autologous platelet concentrates (APCs(+)) and sole bone grafting procedures (APCs(-)) in maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA).

Materials and methods: A systematic search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from electronic database and clinical registers published up to June 1, 2024. Six evaluation indices comprising percentage of new bone formation (NBF%), percentage of residual bone substitute (RBS%), percentage of fibrous tissue (FT%), implant stability quotient (ISQ), bone height (BH) and bone density (BD) were identified.

Results: We analyzed 14 studies involving 268 lifted sinuses and 119 implants. Compared with the APCs(-) group, the APCs(+) group demonstrated a significant advantage regarding NBF% (weight mean difference (MD)= 4.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.82,8.32), p=0.007) and RBS% (MD=-4.48, 95% CI (-6.01,2.96), p<0.01), with no evident superiority in FT% (MD=-0.11, 95% CI (-0.56,0.35), p=0.64), ISQ (MD=-1.68, 95% CI (-6.77,3.40), p=0.52) and BH (standard mean difference (SMD) =-0.11, 95% CI (-3.04,2.83), p=0.94). While APCs(-) group showed a significant benefit in BD compared to the APCs(+) group (MD=-28.34, 95% CI (-48.98,-7.71), p=0.01).

Conclusion: Compared with APCs(-), APCs(+) could be a better option for promoting NBF% and reducing RBS%, whereas we found no evident influence in FT% and ISQ under MSA. Concerning BD and BH results, there were no additional effects with the addition of APCs, which needs to be treated with caution due to the limited number of studies.

Clinical relevance: APCs(+) procedures show promising results, with a higher NBF% and lower RBS%, making them a potential routine MSA strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
期刊最新文献
Effect of vestibular depth on root coverage predictability in Cairo recession type 2 labial gingival recession treated with minimally invasive technique using connective tissue graft: Prospective cohort study. Thirty-six months in vivo wear of enamel antagonists to monolithic zirconia crowns. Comparative assessment of fracture resistance in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: influence of cusp coverage and fiber ribbon placement strategies. Effect of external cervical resorptive defects restored with two bioceramic materials, short glass fiber-reinforced composite and nanohybrid composite on fracture resistance of maxillary anterior teeth: an in-vitro study. Dental caries experience in Indigenous children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing worldwide disparities and time trends (1968-2024).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1