揭示从废弃橄榄渣中提取多产品生物炼制的技术、经济和环境影响

IF 7.3 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c07901
Deborah Pérez-Almada, Ángel Galán-Martín, María del Mar Contreras, Juan Miguel Romero-García, Eulogio Castro
{"title":"揭示从废弃橄榄渣中提取多产品生物炼制的技术、经济和环境影响","authors":"Deborah Pérez-Almada, Ángel Galán-Martín, María del Mar Contreras, Juan Miguel Romero-García, Eulogio Castro","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c07901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biorefineries are pivotal in advancing sustainability, yet most studies remain confined to laboratory scales, lacking comprehensive industrial-level analyses. In this work, the laboratory experiments are scaled up to design and assess the techno-economic and environmental implications of a multiproduct biorefinery system producing antioxidant extracts, lignin, and bioethanol from exhausted olive pomace, a residual biomass from olive oil extraction. Using process simulation and life cycle assessment, five scenarios were evaluated, varying in electricity sources (national mix, solar, wind, or olive biomass) and the heat and cooling sources (fossil natural gas or synthetic natural gas from capture CO<sub>2</sub> and electrolytic hydrogen), with one scenario incorporating a carbon capture and storage (CCS) system. The CCS scenario showed the highest overall costs, 2.5 times higher than the base scenario (27.74 vs 10.99 $/functional unit), primarily due to the additional infrastructure and energy-intensive processes associated with CO<sub>2</sub> utilization and storage. Despite higher costs, it achieved even a negative carbon footprint (−1.05 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq per functional unit cradle-to-gate) and reduced impacts on ecosystem quality, resources, and human health. However, specific impacts like human noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic effects (40% and 60%) and ecotoxicity (up 70%) worsened. Notwithstanding economic barriers and environmental challenges, which can be alleviated by selling carbon credits and tailored policies and strategic decisions, these findings underscore the potential of integrating CCS into biorefinery schemes as a promising pathway to enhance environmental sustainability.","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":"79 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncovering the Techno-Economic and Environmental Implications of a Multiproduct Biorefinery from Exhausted Olive Pomace\",\"authors\":\"Deborah Pérez-Almada, Ángel Galán-Martín, María del Mar Contreras, Juan Miguel Romero-García, Eulogio Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c07901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Biorefineries are pivotal in advancing sustainability, yet most studies remain confined to laboratory scales, lacking comprehensive industrial-level analyses. In this work, the laboratory experiments are scaled up to design and assess the techno-economic and environmental implications of a multiproduct biorefinery system producing antioxidant extracts, lignin, and bioethanol from exhausted olive pomace, a residual biomass from olive oil extraction. Using process simulation and life cycle assessment, five scenarios were evaluated, varying in electricity sources (national mix, solar, wind, or olive biomass) and the heat and cooling sources (fossil natural gas or synthetic natural gas from capture CO<sub>2</sub> and electrolytic hydrogen), with one scenario incorporating a carbon capture and storage (CCS) system. The CCS scenario showed the highest overall costs, 2.5 times higher than the base scenario (27.74 vs 10.99 $/functional unit), primarily due to the additional infrastructure and energy-intensive processes associated with CO<sub>2</sub> utilization and storage. Despite higher costs, it achieved even a negative carbon footprint (−1.05 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq per functional unit cradle-to-gate) and reduced impacts on ecosystem quality, resources, and human health. However, specific impacts like human noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic effects (40% and 60%) and ecotoxicity (up 70%) worsened. Notwithstanding economic barriers and environmental challenges, which can be alleviated by selling carbon credits and tailored policies and strategic decisions, these findings underscore the potential of integrating CCS into biorefinery schemes as a promising pathway to enhance environmental sustainability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":25,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"79 4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c07901\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c07901","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物精炼厂是促进可持续发展的关键,但大多数研究仍局限于实验室规模,缺乏全面的工业水平分析。在这项工作中,实验室实验被扩大到设计和评估多产品生物精炼系统的技术、经济和环境影响,该系统从橄榄油提取的残余生物质——废弃的橄榄渣中生产抗氧化提取物、木质素和生物乙醇。通过过程模拟和生命周期评估,对五种情景进行了评估,这些情景在电力来源(国家混合、太阳能、风能或橄榄生物质)和热和冷却来源(化石天然气或由捕获二氧化碳和电解氢产生的合成天然气)方面有所不同,其中一种情景包含碳捕获和储存(CCS)系统。CCS方案的总成本最高,是基本方案的2.5倍(27.74美元/功能单元vs 10.99美元/功能单元),主要是由于额外的基础设施和与二氧化碳利用和储存相关的能源密集型过程。尽管成本较高,但它甚至实现了负碳足迹(从摇篮到大门的每个功能单位- 1.05千克二氧化碳当量),并减少了对生态系统质量、资源和人类健康的影响。然而,具体的影响,如人类非致癌性和致癌性(分别为40%和60%)以及生态毒性(上升70%)恶化。尽管经济障碍和环境挑战可以通过出售碳信用额度和量身定制的政策和战略决策来缓解,但这些发现强调了将CCS整合到生物炼制计划中作为提高环境可持续性的有希望的途径的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uncovering the Techno-Economic and Environmental Implications of a Multiproduct Biorefinery from Exhausted Olive Pomace
Biorefineries are pivotal in advancing sustainability, yet most studies remain confined to laboratory scales, lacking comprehensive industrial-level analyses. In this work, the laboratory experiments are scaled up to design and assess the techno-economic and environmental implications of a multiproduct biorefinery system producing antioxidant extracts, lignin, and bioethanol from exhausted olive pomace, a residual biomass from olive oil extraction. Using process simulation and life cycle assessment, five scenarios were evaluated, varying in electricity sources (national mix, solar, wind, or olive biomass) and the heat and cooling sources (fossil natural gas or synthetic natural gas from capture CO2 and electrolytic hydrogen), with one scenario incorporating a carbon capture and storage (CCS) system. The CCS scenario showed the highest overall costs, 2.5 times higher than the base scenario (27.74 vs 10.99 $/functional unit), primarily due to the additional infrastructure and energy-intensive processes associated with CO2 utilization and storage. Despite higher costs, it achieved even a negative carbon footprint (−1.05 kg CO2eq per functional unit cradle-to-gate) and reduced impacts on ecosystem quality, resources, and human health. However, specific impacts like human noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic effects (40% and 60%) and ecotoxicity (up 70%) worsened. Notwithstanding economic barriers and environmental challenges, which can be alleviated by selling carbon credits and tailored policies and strategic decisions, these findings underscore the potential of integrating CCS into biorefinery schemes as a promising pathway to enhance environmental sustainability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1470
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment. The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.
期刊最新文献
Direct Carboxylation Reactions of Lignin-Derived Biobased Aromatics or Lignin with Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Long-Chain Branched Poly(butylene Succinate): From Melt Strength Enhancement and Comprehensive Performance Improvement to Blown Film Processing Solvent-Free Synthesis of Novel Galactose-Branched Oligosaccharides from Cellulose for Potential Prebiotics Unlocking the Hydrodeoxygenation Pathway: Synergy between Single-Atom Fe and N-Doped Carbon for Direct Conversion of Unsaturated Aldehydes to Alkenes Gold “Self-Leaching” in Chloride-Rich Media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1