基础设施之外:中老年人骑行的多重障碍

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2025.102003
Wilbert den Hoed
{"title":"基础设施之外:中老年人骑行的多重障碍","authors":"Wilbert den Hoed","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Active mobility is at the core of cities' efforts to promote inclusion, health and liveability. However, the role of cycling remains marginal in many cities and its promotion is usually approached from separate health or transport angles. In addition, its sustainability and suitability for people of all ages is questionable, following the persistently low cycling use among older age groups. While urban populations are ageing and cycling offers important benefits for positive ageing, cycling's promotion strategies typically centre on the modal shift of younger age groups and rarely engage with the long-term experiences that define mobility behaviour. In response, this article offers insight into later life urban cycling by illuminating how diverse cycling lifecourses shape ageing, wellbeing, and mobility itself. By using a mix of qualitative methods, it explores the cycling trajectories and experiences of middle-to-older aged adults in a distinctly low-cycling city in the United Kingdom, where it identifies heterogeneous trajectories and sets of barriers and negotiations that shape present and future cycling practices. Furthermore, this piece reveals how cycling's mobility and wellbeing benefits entangle over the lifecourse, as positive healthy ageing resources. Finally, it identifies what it takes, beyond infrastructural transformations, to support low-cycling cities to make cyc a feasible and normalised part of the mobile practices of people of all ages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 102003"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond infrastructure: The multiple barriers to cycling in middle and older age\",\"authors\":\"Wilbert den Hoed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Active mobility is at the core of cities' efforts to promote inclusion, health and liveability. However, the role of cycling remains marginal in many cities and its promotion is usually approached from separate health or transport angles. In addition, its sustainability and suitability for people of all ages is questionable, following the persistently low cycling use among older age groups. While urban populations are ageing and cycling offers important benefits for positive ageing, cycling's promotion strategies typically centre on the modal shift of younger age groups and rarely engage with the long-term experiences that define mobility behaviour. In response, this article offers insight into later life urban cycling by illuminating how diverse cycling lifecourses shape ageing, wellbeing, and mobility itself. By using a mix of qualitative methods, it explores the cycling trajectories and experiences of middle-to-older aged adults in a distinctly low-cycling city in the United Kingdom, where it identifies heterogeneous trajectories and sets of barriers and negotiations that shape present and future cycling practices. Furthermore, this piece reveals how cycling's mobility and wellbeing benefits entangle over the lifecourse, as positive healthy ageing resources. Finally, it identifies what it takes, beyond infrastructural transformations, to support low-cycling cities to make cyc a feasible and normalised part of the mobile practices of people of all ages.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000234\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

积极的流动性是城市促进包容、健康和宜居的核心。然而,在许多城市,骑自行车的作用仍然是边缘的,它的推广通常从单独的健康或交通角度来考虑。此外,它的可持续性和适合所有年龄段的人是值得怀疑的,因为在老年群体中骑车的使用一直很低。虽然城市人口正在老龄化,骑自行车为积极老龄化提供了重要的好处,但骑自行车的推广策略通常集中在年轻群体的模式转变上,很少涉及定义移动行为的长期体验。作为回应,本文通过阐明不同的骑行过程如何影响老龄化、健康和流动性本身,提供了对晚年城市骑行的见解。通过混合使用定性方法,它探索了英国一个明显低自行车城市的中老年成年人的骑行轨迹和经历,在那里它确定了塑造现在和未来自行车实践的异质轨迹和一系列障碍和谈判。此外,这篇文章揭示了骑车的机动性和健康效益如何在整个生命过程中交织在一起,作为积极的健康老龄化资源。最后,它确定了除了基础设施改造之外,还需要做些什么来支持低循环城市,使循环成为所有年龄段人群移动实践的可行和正常化的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond infrastructure: The multiple barriers to cycling in middle and older age
Active mobility is at the core of cities' efforts to promote inclusion, health and liveability. However, the role of cycling remains marginal in many cities and its promotion is usually approached from separate health or transport angles. In addition, its sustainability and suitability for people of all ages is questionable, following the persistently low cycling use among older age groups. While urban populations are ageing and cycling offers important benefits for positive ageing, cycling's promotion strategies typically centre on the modal shift of younger age groups and rarely engage with the long-term experiences that define mobility behaviour. In response, this article offers insight into later life urban cycling by illuminating how diverse cycling lifecourses shape ageing, wellbeing, and mobility itself. By using a mix of qualitative methods, it explores the cycling trajectories and experiences of middle-to-older aged adults in a distinctly low-cycling city in the United Kingdom, where it identifies heterogeneous trajectories and sets of barriers and negotiations that shape present and future cycling practices. Furthermore, this piece reveals how cycling's mobility and wellbeing benefits entangle over the lifecourse, as positive healthy ageing resources. Finally, it identifies what it takes, beyond infrastructural transformations, to support low-cycling cities to make cyc a feasible and normalised part of the mobile practices of people of all ages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Spatial assessment of electric vehicle transition scenarios for Türkiye's 2030 emission reduction targets Environmental exposure, terrain, and mode-specific sensitivity in bicycle demand: Implications for health-supportive urban mobility The journey matters: How do built environment and safety perceptions shape walking experiences around metro stations in Monterrey, Mexico? Substituting car trips with public and active transport in European urban areas: Quantifying potential modal shift across the EU27 Drivers' stress and blue light filtration: Combined SCR, HRV and VEP approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1