ESG评级分歧与企业数字化转型

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Finance Research Letters Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2025.106903
Hao Ren
{"title":"ESG评级分歧与企业数字化转型","authors":"Hao Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.106903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the increasing focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, discrepancies in ratings are weighing on a company's stakeholders. Based on the hypothesis of information asymmetry, this study uses Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023 to examine how ESG rating disagreement impacts corporate digital transformation (CDT). Empirical results show that ESG rating discrepancy is associated with lower CDT, with technical innovation and financing constraints being the two mechanisms. When testing alternative approaches, including the alternative of CDT, propensity scoring matching and Heckman's two-stage model, the findings remain robust. The findings have policy implications for encouraging companies to disclose their ESG information in the context of digital economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 106903"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESG rating disagreement and corporate digital transformation\",\"authors\":\"Hao Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.frl.2025.106903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite the increasing focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, discrepancies in ratings are weighing on a company's stakeholders. Based on the hypothesis of information asymmetry, this study uses Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023 to examine how ESG rating disagreement impacts corporate digital transformation (CDT). Empirical results show that ESG rating discrepancy is associated with lower CDT, with technical innovation and financing constraints being the two mechanisms. When testing alternative approaches, including the alternative of CDT, propensity scoring matching and Heckman's two-stage model, the findings remain robust. The findings have policy implications for encouraging companies to disclose their ESG information in the context of digital economy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325001679\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325001679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管越来越多的人关注环境、社会和治理(ESG)因素,但评级差异正在给公司的利益相关者带来压力。基于信息不对称假设,本研究以2010 - 2023年中国a股上市公司为研究对象,考察ESG评级差异对企业数字化转型的影响。实证结果表明,ESG评级差异与CDT降低相关,其中技术创新和融资约束是两种机制。当测试替代方法时,包括CDT替代、倾向得分匹配和Heckman的两阶段模型,结果仍然是稳健的。研究结果对鼓励企业在数字经济背景下披露ESG信息具有政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ESG rating disagreement and corporate digital transformation
Despite the increasing focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, discrepancies in ratings are weighing on a company's stakeholders. Based on the hypothesis of information asymmetry, this study uses Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023 to examine how ESG rating disagreement impacts corporate digital transformation (CDT). Empirical results show that ESG rating discrepancy is associated with lower CDT, with technical innovation and financing constraints being the two mechanisms. When testing alternative approaches, including the alternative of CDT, propensity scoring matching and Heckman's two-stage model, the findings remain robust. The findings have policy implications for encouraging companies to disclose their ESG information in the context of digital economy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Finance Research Letters
Finance Research Letters BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
14.40%
发文量
863
期刊介绍: Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies. Papers are invited in the following areas: Actuarial studies Alternative investments Asset Pricing Bankruptcy and liquidation Banks and other Depository Institutions Behavioral and experimental finance Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance Capital budgeting and corporate investment Capital markets and accounting Capital structure and payout policy Commodities Contagion, crises and interdependence Corporate governance Credit and fixed income markets and instruments Derivatives Emerging markets Energy Finance and Energy Markets Financial Econometrics Financial History Financial intermediation and money markets Financial markets and marketplaces Financial Mathematics and Econophysics Financial Regulation and Law Forecasting Frontier market studies International Finance Market efficiency, event studies Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control Micro Finance Institutions Microstructure Non-bank Financial Institutions Personal Finance Portfolio choice and investing Real estate finance and investing Risk SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance
期刊最新文献
Relationship between digital asset impairment, credit ratings, and debt financing ability When do carbon emissions matter for sovereign ratings? Governance and the pricing of transition risk Observation loss from missing data in dynamic panel GMM Social networks, financing constraints, and rural household consumption Do we trust in family? CEO stock option exercises and earnings management in family-owned firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1