{"title":"ESG评级分歧与企业数字化转型","authors":"Hao Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.106903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the increasing focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, discrepancies in ratings are weighing on a company's stakeholders. Based on the hypothesis of information asymmetry, this study uses Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023 to examine how ESG rating disagreement impacts corporate digital transformation (CDT). Empirical results show that ESG rating discrepancy is associated with lower CDT, with technical innovation and financing constraints being the two mechanisms. When testing alternative approaches, including the alternative of CDT, propensity scoring matching and Heckman's two-stage model, the findings remain robust. The findings have policy implications for encouraging companies to disclose their ESG information in the context of digital economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 106903"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESG rating disagreement and corporate digital transformation\",\"authors\":\"Hao Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.frl.2025.106903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite the increasing focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, discrepancies in ratings are weighing on a company's stakeholders. Based on the hypothesis of information asymmetry, this study uses Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023 to examine how ESG rating disagreement impacts corporate digital transformation (CDT). Empirical results show that ESG rating discrepancy is associated with lower CDT, with technical innovation and financing constraints being the two mechanisms. When testing alternative approaches, including the alternative of CDT, propensity scoring matching and Heckman's two-stage model, the findings remain robust. The findings have policy implications for encouraging companies to disclose their ESG information in the context of digital economy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325001679\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325001679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
ESG rating disagreement and corporate digital transformation
Despite the increasing focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, discrepancies in ratings are weighing on a company's stakeholders. Based on the hypothesis of information asymmetry, this study uses Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023 to examine how ESG rating disagreement impacts corporate digital transformation (CDT). Empirical results show that ESG rating discrepancy is associated with lower CDT, with technical innovation and financing constraints being the two mechanisms. When testing alternative approaches, including the alternative of CDT, propensity scoring matching and Heckman's two-stage model, the findings remain robust. The findings have policy implications for encouraging companies to disclose their ESG information in the context of digital economy.
期刊介绍:
Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies.
Papers are invited in the following areas:
Actuarial studies
Alternative investments
Asset Pricing
Bankruptcy and liquidation
Banks and other Depository Institutions
Behavioral and experimental finance
Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance
Capital budgeting and corporate investment
Capital markets and accounting
Capital structure and payout policy
Commodities
Contagion, crises and interdependence
Corporate governance
Credit and fixed income markets and instruments
Derivatives
Emerging markets
Energy Finance and Energy Markets
Financial Econometrics
Financial History
Financial intermediation and money markets
Financial markets and marketplaces
Financial Mathematics and Econophysics
Financial Regulation and Law
Forecasting
Frontier market studies
International Finance
Market efficiency, event studies
Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control
Micro Finance Institutions
Microstructure
Non-bank Financial Institutions
Personal Finance
Portfolio choice and investing
Real estate finance and investing
Risk
SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance