每周一次的西马鲁肽与每日一次的利拉鲁肽对成人减肥的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Cts-Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1111/cts.70127
Tallal Mushtaq Hashmi, Mushood Ahmed, Ali Haider, Salman Naseem, Uzair Jafar, Munir Hussain, Javed Iqbal, Waqar Ali, Raheel Ahmed
{"title":"每周一次的西马鲁肽与每日一次的利拉鲁肽对成人减肥的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析","authors":"Tallal Mushtaq Hashmi,&nbsp;Mushood Ahmed,&nbsp;Ali Haider,&nbsp;Salman Naseem,&nbsp;Uzair Jafar,&nbsp;Munir Hussain,&nbsp;Javed Iqbal,&nbsp;Waqar Ali,&nbsp;Raheel Ahmed","doi":"10.1111/cts.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in facilitating weight loss among patients with diabetes is widely recognized. However, there are limited data available on the relative effectiveness and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified through a comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases from inception until July 2024. Statistical analysis was conducted using R version 4.4.1 with the “meta” package, employing a random effects model. Three RCTs with a total of 922 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that OW semaglutide significantly reduced body weight (WMD: −4.55; 95% CI: −6.43, −2.67, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), HbA1c (WMD: −0.46; 95% CI: −0.84, −0.08; <i>p</i> = 0.02), and fasting plasma glucose levels (WMD: −1.23; 95% CI: −1.51, −0.95; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) in comparison to OD liraglutide. The risk of severe adverse effects (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.53–5.16; <i>p</i> = 0.38) and gastrointestinal adverse effects (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 0.82–4.14; <i>p</i> = 0.14) was comparable between both groups. Once-weekly semaglutide therapy results in a more pronounced loss in body weight, HbA1c, and fasting glucose levels compared to once-daily liraglutide.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70127","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Daily Liraglutide for Weight Loss in Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials\",\"authors\":\"Tallal Mushtaq Hashmi,&nbsp;Mushood Ahmed,&nbsp;Ali Haider,&nbsp;Salman Naseem,&nbsp;Uzair Jafar,&nbsp;Munir Hussain,&nbsp;Javed Iqbal,&nbsp;Waqar Ali,&nbsp;Raheel Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cts.70127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in facilitating weight loss among patients with diabetes is widely recognized. However, there are limited data available on the relative effectiveness and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified through a comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases from inception until July 2024. Statistical analysis was conducted using R version 4.4.1 with the “meta” package, employing a random effects model. Three RCTs with a total of 922 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that OW semaglutide significantly reduced body weight (WMD: −4.55; 95% CI: −6.43, −2.67, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), HbA1c (WMD: −0.46; 95% CI: −0.84, −0.08; <i>p</i> = 0.02), and fasting plasma glucose levels (WMD: −1.23; 95% CI: −1.51, −0.95; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) in comparison to OD liraglutide. The risk of severe adverse effects (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.53–5.16; <i>p</i> = 0.38) and gastrointestinal adverse effects (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 0.82–4.14; <i>p</i> = 0.14) was comparable between both groups. Once-weekly semaglutide therapy results in a more pronounced loss in body weight, HbA1c, and fasting glucose levels compared to once-daily liraglutide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70127\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70127\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂促进糖尿病患者减肥的有效性已得到广泛认可。然而,关于每周一次的西马鲁肽与每日一次的利拉鲁肽的相对有效性和安全性的数据有限。我们对随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,这些随机对照试验是通过对Cochrane图书馆、PubMed和ScienceDirect数据库的全面检索确定的,从开始到2024年7月。统计分析采用R 4.4.1版本和meta软件包,采用随机效应模型。我们的荟萃分析纳入了3项随机对照试验,共922例患者。结果表明,OW semaglutide显著降低体重(WMD:−4.55;95%置信区间:6.43−−2.67,p & lt; 0.01)、糖化血红蛋白(大规模杀伤性武器:−0.46;95% ci:−0.84,−0.08;p = 0.02),空腹血糖水平(WMD:−1.23;95% ci:−1.51,−0.95;p < 0.01)。严重不良反应的风险(OR, 1.66;95% ci, 0.53-5.16;p = 0.38)和胃肠道不良反应(OR, 1.84;95% ci, 0.82-4.14;P = 0.14),两组间具有可比性。与每日一次的利拉鲁肽相比,每周一次的西马鲁肽治疗导致体重、糖化血红蛋白和空腹血糖水平的下降更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Daily Liraglutide for Weight Loss in Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in facilitating weight loss among patients with diabetes is widely recognized. However, there are limited data available on the relative effectiveness and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified through a comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases from inception until July 2024. Statistical analysis was conducted using R version 4.4.1 with the “meta” package, employing a random effects model. Three RCTs with a total of 922 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that OW semaglutide significantly reduced body weight (WMD: −4.55; 95% CI: −6.43, −2.67, p < 0.01), HbA1c (WMD: −0.46; 95% CI: −0.84, −0.08; p = 0.02), and fasting plasma glucose levels (WMD: −1.23; 95% CI: −1.51, −0.95; p < 0.01) in comparison to OD liraglutide. The risk of severe adverse effects (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.53–5.16; p = 0.38) and gastrointestinal adverse effects (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 0.82–4.14; p = 0.14) was comparable between both groups. Once-weekly semaglutide therapy results in a more pronounced loss in body weight, HbA1c, and fasting glucose levels compared to once-daily liraglutide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
期刊最新文献
Pioneering a Hybrid Decentralized Clinical Trial in South Korea: Assessing Feasibility, Data Integrity, and Participant Perceptions A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1 Study of Adiponectin Agonist (PEG)-BHD1028 in People With Insulin Resistance The Effect of Efavirenz and Rufinamide on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Quizartinib: Two Phase 1 Studies in Healthy Participants Reply to “Preclinical and Clinical Evidence on Chloroquine or Hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19”: Achieving Statistical Significance Does Not Mean That Clinical Relevance Can Be Disregarded, and This Must Be Considered When Interpreting Results The Inflammatory Response in the Murine Ovalbumin-Induced Skin Inflammation Model Is Robust Despite Major Gut Microbiota Differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1