腰方肌阻滞与腹横面阻滞在小儿下腹部手术中的术后镇痛效果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S502044
Abdullah Yousef Aldalati, Ayham Mohammad Hussein, Raghad Ataya, Bassel Alrabadi, Ramez M Odat, Muhammad Idrees, Ahmad Al-Dabagh, Zaid Kamal, Osama Aloudat, Ahmad Al-Qaoud
{"title":"腰方肌阻滞与腹横面阻滞在小儿下腹部手术中的术后镇痛效果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Abdullah Yousef Aldalati, Ayham Mohammad Hussein, Raghad Ataya, Bassel Alrabadi, Ramez M Odat, Muhammad Idrees, Ahmad Al-Dabagh, Zaid Kamal, Osama Aloudat, Ahmad Al-Qaoud","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S502044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Management of postoperative pain in pediatric patients is challenging. Traditional methods of postoperative pain management may not always provide adequate relief. We aim to compare the effect of Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAPB) on the quality of postoperative analgesia in pediatrics undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to August 2024 for studies that compared QLB and TAPB in the context of pediatric lower abdominal surgery. Pooled mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), and odds ratio (OR) were calculated by a random effect model using RevMan 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies met the pre-defined inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis indicated that postoperative pain measured by the FLACC score was lower in the QLB group compared to the TAPB group (MD: -0.37; 95% CI: -0.51, -0.23; P < 0.00001). QLB was also associated with lower rescue analgesic demand (OR: 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13, 0.49; P < 0.0001), higher parent satisfaction (SMD: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.53, 1.02; P < 0.00001), longer time without the need for analgesic administration (MD: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.38, 1.71; P = 0.002), and lower paracetamol consumption (SMD: -1.40; 95% CI: -2.43, -0.36; P = 0.008). However, no significant difference was found in terms of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and heart rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QLB provides superior analgesia compared to TAPB in pediatrics undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"567-577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Pediatric Lower Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Yousef Aldalati, Ayham Mohammad Hussein, Raghad Ataya, Bassel Alrabadi, Ramez M Odat, Muhammad Idrees, Ahmad Al-Dabagh, Zaid Kamal, Osama Aloudat, Ahmad Al-Qaoud\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S502044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Management of postoperative pain in pediatric patients is challenging. Traditional methods of postoperative pain management may not always provide adequate relief. We aim to compare the effect of Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAPB) on the quality of postoperative analgesia in pediatrics undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to August 2024 for studies that compared QLB and TAPB in the context of pediatric lower abdominal surgery. Pooled mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), and odds ratio (OR) were calculated by a random effect model using RevMan 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies met the pre-defined inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis indicated that postoperative pain measured by the FLACC score was lower in the QLB group compared to the TAPB group (MD: -0.37; 95% CI: -0.51, -0.23; P < 0.00001). QLB was also associated with lower rescue analgesic demand (OR: 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13, 0.49; P < 0.0001), higher parent satisfaction (SMD: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.53, 1.02; P < 0.00001), longer time without the need for analgesic administration (MD: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.38, 1.71; P = 0.002), and lower paracetamol consumption (SMD: -1.40; 95% CI: -2.43, -0.36; P = 0.008). However, no significant difference was found in terms of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and heart rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QLB provides superior analgesia compared to TAPB in pediatrics undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"567-577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806731/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S502044\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S502044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:儿科患者术后疼痛的处理具有挑战性。传统的术后疼痛管理方法可能并不总是提供足够的缓解。我们的目的是比较腰方肌阻滞(QLB)和腹横面阻滞(TAPB)对儿科下腹部手术术后镇痛质量的影响。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane Library,检索截至2024年8月比较QLB和TAPB在小儿下腹部手术中的研究。采用RevMan 5.4随机效应模型计算合并平均差(MD)、标准化平均差(SMD)和比值比(OR)。结果:9项研究符合预定的纳入标准。综合分析显示,与TAPB组相比,QLB组术后FLACC评分测量的疼痛更低(MD: -0.37;95% ci: -0.51, -0.23;P < 0.00001)。QLB还与较低的救援镇痛需求相关(OR: 0.25;95% ci, 0.13, 0.49;P < 0.0001),父母满意度较高(SMD: 0.78;95% ci: 0.53, 1.02;P < 0.00001),无需给药时间较长(MD: 1.04;95% ci: 0.38, 1.71;P = 0.002),对乙酰氨基酚的用量更低(SMD: -1.40;95% ci: -2.43, -0.36;P = 0.008)。然而,在术后恶心、呕吐和心率方面没有发现显著差异。结论:与TAPB相比,QLB在小儿科下腹部手术中具有更好的镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Pediatric Lower Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: Management of postoperative pain in pediatric patients is challenging. Traditional methods of postoperative pain management may not always provide adequate relief. We aim to compare the effect of Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAPB) on the quality of postoperative analgesia in pediatrics undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to August 2024 for studies that compared QLB and TAPB in the context of pediatric lower abdominal surgery. Pooled mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), and odds ratio (OR) were calculated by a random effect model using RevMan 5.4.

Results: Nine studies met the pre-defined inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis indicated that postoperative pain measured by the FLACC score was lower in the QLB group compared to the TAPB group (MD: -0.37; 95% CI: -0.51, -0.23; P < 0.00001). QLB was also associated with lower rescue analgesic demand (OR: 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13, 0.49; P < 0.0001), higher parent satisfaction (SMD: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.53, 1.02; P < 0.00001), longer time without the need for analgesic administration (MD: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.38, 1.71; P = 0.002), and lower paracetamol consumption (SMD: -1.40; 95% CI: -2.43, -0.36; P = 0.008). However, no significant difference was found in terms of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and heart rate.

Conclusion: QLB provides superior analgesia compared to TAPB in pediatrics undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Presurgical Prognostic Factors for Chronic Postsurgical Pain Across Developmental Stages in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Liposomal Bupivacaine Infiltration and Postoperative Pain Outcomes in Lumbar Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [Letter]. Central Canal Stenosis Severity Does Not Predict Residual Leg Pain After Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression in Frail Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study. Efficacy, Safety, and Economic Evaluation of Gamidaeganghwal-Tang in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial [Letter]. Effect of Preoperative Pain Catastrophizing on Postpartum Depression and Chronic Postsurgical Pain After Cesarean Section: A Prospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1