术前体成分分析作为减肥手术后体重减轻结果的预测因子:一项生物电阻抗研究。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1007/s11695-025-07726-7
Piero Giustacchini, Giuseppe Marincola, Simona Masia, Valentina Milano, Voltjan Sula, Marco Raffaelli
{"title":"术前体成分分析作为减肥手术后体重减轻结果的预测因子:一项生物电阻抗研究。","authors":"Piero Giustacchini, Giuseppe Marincola, Simona Masia, Valentina Milano, Voltjan Sula, Marco Raffaelli","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07726-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bariatric surgery (BS) is an effective intervention for severe obesity, but some patients may experience sub-optimal weight loss. This study investigates the role of preoperative body composition parameters, measured via bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), in predicting postoperative weight loss outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 102 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) between January 2020 and April 2023. Preoperative body composition metrics, including fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), body cell mass (BCM), and phase angle (PhA), were correlated with percentages of excess weight loss (%EWL) and total weight loss (%TWL) at 12 months post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that patients with higher preoperative BCM and PhA showed significantly better weight loss outcomes. Specifically, patients with optimal weight loss had a mean BCM of 35.2 ± 3.5 kg and a PhA of 6.1 ± 0.5, whereas those with sub-optimal outcomes had a mean BCM of 29.8 ± 4.2 kg and a PhA of 4.9 ± 0.6 (p < 0.01 for both). Additionally, higher FM was associated with lower %EWL (r =  - 0.40, p < 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified BCM (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.4) and %FM (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9) as independent predictors of successful weight loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative BIA parameters, particularly BCM and %FM, are significantly associated with weight loss outcomes in BS patients. These findings suggest a potential role in guiding pre-surgical patient assessment and tailored care, while acknowledging that this relationship is correlational and not necessarily causal.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"685-693"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative Body Composition Analysis as a Predictor of Weight Loss Outcomes Following Bariatric Surgery: A Bioelectrical Impedance Study.\",\"authors\":\"Piero Giustacchini, Giuseppe Marincola, Simona Masia, Valentina Milano, Voltjan Sula, Marco Raffaelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-025-07726-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bariatric surgery (BS) is an effective intervention for severe obesity, but some patients may experience sub-optimal weight loss. This study investigates the role of preoperative body composition parameters, measured via bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), in predicting postoperative weight loss outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 102 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) between January 2020 and April 2023. Preoperative body composition metrics, including fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), body cell mass (BCM), and phase angle (PhA), were correlated with percentages of excess weight loss (%EWL) and total weight loss (%TWL) at 12 months post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that patients with higher preoperative BCM and PhA showed significantly better weight loss outcomes. Specifically, patients with optimal weight loss had a mean BCM of 35.2 ± 3.5 kg and a PhA of 6.1 ± 0.5, whereas those with sub-optimal outcomes had a mean BCM of 29.8 ± 4.2 kg and a PhA of 4.9 ± 0.6 (p < 0.01 for both). Additionally, higher FM was associated with lower %EWL (r =  - 0.40, p < 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified BCM (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.4) and %FM (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9) as independent predictors of successful weight loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative BIA parameters, particularly BCM and %FM, are significantly associated with weight loss outcomes in BS patients. These findings suggest a potential role in guiding pre-surgical patient assessment and tailored care, while acknowledging that this relationship is correlational and not necessarily causal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"685-693\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07726-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07726-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:减肥手术(BS)是一种有效的干预严重肥胖,但一些患者可能会出现不理想的体重减轻。本研究探讨了通过生物电阻抗分析(BIA)测量的术前体成分参数在预测术后减肥结果中的作用。方法:回顾性分析2020年1月至2023年4月期间接受袖式胃切除术(SG)、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)或单吻合式胃旁路术(OAGB)的102例患者。术前体组成指标,包括脂肪质量(FM)、无脂质量(FFM)、体细胞质量(BCM)和相位角(PhA),与术后12个月的超重减重百分比(%EWL)和总减重百分比(%TWL)相关。结果:研究发现术前BCM和PhA较高的患者减肥效果明显较好。具体而言,体重减轻最佳的患者平均BCM为35.2±3.5 kg, PhA为6.1±0.5,而结果不理想的患者平均BCM为29.8±4.2 kg, PhA为4.9±0.6 (p)。结论:术前BIA参数,特别是BCM和%FM,与BS患者的体重减轻结果显著相关。这些发现提示了指导术前患者评估和量身定制护理的潜在作用,同时承认这种关系是相关的,不一定是因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preoperative Body Composition Analysis as a Predictor of Weight Loss Outcomes Following Bariatric Surgery: A Bioelectrical Impedance Study.

Background: Bariatric surgery (BS) is an effective intervention for severe obesity, but some patients may experience sub-optimal weight loss. This study investigates the role of preoperative body composition parameters, measured via bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), in predicting postoperative weight loss outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 102 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) between January 2020 and April 2023. Preoperative body composition metrics, including fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), body cell mass (BCM), and phase angle (PhA), were correlated with percentages of excess weight loss (%EWL) and total weight loss (%TWL) at 12 months post-surgery.

Results: The study found that patients with higher preoperative BCM and PhA showed significantly better weight loss outcomes. Specifically, patients with optimal weight loss had a mean BCM of 35.2 ± 3.5 kg and a PhA of 6.1 ± 0.5, whereas those with sub-optimal outcomes had a mean BCM of 29.8 ± 4.2 kg and a PhA of 4.9 ± 0.6 (p < 0.01 for both). Additionally, higher FM was associated with lower %EWL (r =  - 0.40, p < 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified BCM (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.4) and %FM (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9) as independent predictors of successful weight loss.

Conclusions: Preoperative BIA parameters, particularly BCM and %FM, are significantly associated with weight loss outcomes in BS patients. These findings suggest a potential role in guiding pre-surgical patient assessment and tailored care, while acknowledging that this relationship is correlational and not necessarily causal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Pre- and Postoperative Nutrition Support on Postoperative Outcomes and Complications in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis. Metabolic Surgery in Adolescents with BMI ≥50 kg/m²: A Safety and Trends Analysis Based on MBSAQIP. A Longitudinal Study Exploring the Influence of Weight Bias Internalization and Weight-Based Discrimination on Pathological Eating After Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Correction to: Bariatric Surgery for Patients Living with Obesity and Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Evaluating Perioperative Safety and Postoperative Functional Outcomes. Safety Framework for Gastric Mucosal Ablation (GMA) Using Hybrid Argon Plasma Coagulation (hAPC): International Expert Consensus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1