{"title":"利用计算机断层图像预测质子停止功率比和其他参数的机器学习方法和模型。","authors":"Charles Ekene Chika","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_120_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to accurately estimate proton stopping power ratio (SPR), relative electron density <i>ρ</i> <sub>e</sub>, effective atomic number (<i>Z</i> <sub>eff</sub>), and mean excitation energy (<i>I</i>) using one simple robust model and design a machine learning algorithm that will lead to automation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Empirical relationships between computed tomography (CT) number and SPR, <i>ρ</i> <sub>e</sub> (<i>Z</i> <sub>eff</sub>) and <i>I</i> were used to formulate a model that predicts all the four parameters using linear attenuation coefficients which can be converted to CT numbers. The results of these models were compared with the results of other existing models. Thirty-three ICRU human tissues were used as modeling data and 12 Gammex inserts as testing data for the machine learning algorithm designed. More ways of tissue classification were introduced to improve accuracy. In the examples, the dual energy methods were implemented using 80 kVp and 150 kVP/Sn.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed method gave modeling root mean square error (RMSE) near 1% at maximum for the case of SPR and <i>ρ</i> <sub>e</sub> for both single and dual-energy CT approaches considered with modeling RMSE of 0.32% for <i>ρ</i> <sub>e</sub> and 0.38% for SPR as modeling RMSE with room for improvement (this can be done by adjusting the model number of terms as well as the parameters). The method was able to achieve modeling RMSE of 1.11% for <i>I</i> and 1.66% for <i>Z</i> <sub>ef</sub> <sub>f</sub>. The mean error for all the estimated quantities was near 0.00%. In most cases, the proposed method has lower testing RMSE and mean error compare to the other methods presented in the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed method proves to be more flexible and robust among all presented methods since it has lower testing error in most cases and can be improved based on data using the machine learning algorithm. The algorithm can also improve estimation by adjusting the model as well as aid in automation and it's easy to implement.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"49 4","pages":"519-530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Approach and Model for Predicting Proton Stopping Power Ratio and Other Parameters Using Computed Tomography Images.\",\"authors\":\"Charles Ekene Chika\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmp.jmp_120_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to accurately estimate proton stopping power ratio (SPR), relative electron density <i>ρ</i> <sub>e</sub>, effective atomic number (<i>Z</i> <sub>eff</sub>), and mean excitation energy (<i>I</i>) using one simple robust model and design a machine learning algorithm that will lead to automation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Empirical relationships between computed tomography (CT) number and SPR, <i>ρ</i> <sub>e</sub> (<i>Z</i> <sub>eff</sub>) and <i>I</i> were used to formulate a model that predicts all the four parameters using linear attenuation coefficients which can be converted to CT numbers. The results of these models were compared with the results of other existing models. Thirty-three ICRU human tissues were used as modeling data and 12 Gammex inserts as testing data for the machine learning algorithm designed. More ways of tissue classification were introduced to improve accuracy. In the examples, the dual energy methods were implemented using 80 kVp and 150 kVP/Sn.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed method gave modeling root mean square error (RMSE) near 1% at maximum for the case of SPR and <i>ρ</i> <sub>e</sub> for both single and dual-energy CT approaches considered with modeling RMSE of 0.32% for <i>ρ</i> <sub>e</sub> and 0.38% for SPR as modeling RMSE with room for improvement (this can be done by adjusting the model number of terms as well as the parameters). The method was able to achieve modeling RMSE of 1.11% for <i>I</i> and 1.66% for <i>Z</i> <sub>ef</sub> <sub>f</sub>. The mean error for all the estimated quantities was near 0.00%. In most cases, the proposed method has lower testing RMSE and mean error compare to the other methods presented in the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed method proves to be more flexible and robust among all presented methods since it has lower testing error in most cases and can be improved based on data using the machine learning algorithm. The algorithm can also improve estimation by adjusting the model as well as aid in automation and it's easy to implement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"49 4\",\"pages\":\"519-530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801089/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_120_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_120_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是使用一个简单的鲁棒模型准确估计质子停止功率比(SPR),相对电子密度ρ e,有效原子序数(zeff)和平均激发能(I),并设计一种机器学习算法,从而实现自动化。方法:利用计算机断层扫描(CT)数与SPR、ρ e (zeff)和I之间的经验关系,建立一个利用线性衰减系数预测所有四个参数的模型,该模型可转换为CT数。将这些模型的结果与其他已有模型的结果进行了比较。采用33个ICRU人体组织作为建模数据,12个Gammex刀片作为测试数据,设计了机器学习算法。引入了更多的组织分类方法来提高准确率。在实例中,采用80 kVp和150 kVp /Sn实现了双能量法。结果:该方法对单能量和双能量CT方法的建模均方根误差(RMSE)最大接近1%,考虑到ρ e的建模均方根误差为0.32%,SPR的建模均方根误差为0.38%,建模均方根误差有改进的余地(这可以通过调整模型项数和参数来实现)。该方法能够实现I的建模RMSE为1.11%,Z ef的建模RMSE为1.66%。所有估计量的平均误差接近0.00%。在大多数情况下,与研究中提出的其他方法相比,该方法具有较低的检验均方根误差和平均误差。结论:本文提出的方法在大多数情况下具有较低的测试误差,并且可以根据数据使用机器学习算法进行改进,在所有方法中具有较强的灵活性和鲁棒性。该算法还可以通过调整模型来改进估计,有助于实现自动化,易于实现。
Machine Learning Approach and Model for Predicting Proton Stopping Power Ratio and Other Parameters Using Computed Tomography Images.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to accurately estimate proton stopping power ratio (SPR), relative electron density ρe, effective atomic number (Zeff), and mean excitation energy (I) using one simple robust model and design a machine learning algorithm that will lead to automation.
Methods: Empirical relationships between computed tomography (CT) number and SPR, ρe (Zeff) and I were used to formulate a model that predicts all the four parameters using linear attenuation coefficients which can be converted to CT numbers. The results of these models were compared with the results of other existing models. Thirty-three ICRU human tissues were used as modeling data and 12 Gammex inserts as testing data for the machine learning algorithm designed. More ways of tissue classification were introduced to improve accuracy. In the examples, the dual energy methods were implemented using 80 kVp and 150 kVP/Sn.
Results: The proposed method gave modeling root mean square error (RMSE) near 1% at maximum for the case of SPR and ρe for both single and dual-energy CT approaches considered with modeling RMSE of 0.32% for ρe and 0.38% for SPR as modeling RMSE with room for improvement (this can be done by adjusting the model number of terms as well as the parameters). The method was able to achieve modeling RMSE of 1.11% for I and 1.66% for Zeff. The mean error for all the estimated quantities was near 0.00%. In most cases, the proposed method has lower testing RMSE and mean error compare to the other methods presented in the study.
Conclusion: The proposed method proves to be more flexible and robust among all presented methods since it has lower testing error in most cases and can be improved based on data using the machine learning algorithm. The algorithm can also improve estimation by adjusting the model as well as aid in automation and it's easy to implement.
期刊介绍:
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.