Yunfeng Li, Meng Cai, Nan Li, Hua Zhang, Ershun Huang, Jinghui Zhao, Mei Jin, Long Zhang
{"title":"伤口脱落对微生物培养诊断的价值。","authors":"Yunfeng Li, Meng Cai, Nan Li, Hua Zhang, Ershun Huang, Jinghui Zhao, Mei Jin, Long Zhang","doi":"10.1111/wrr.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Slough is not currently a recommended microbiology culture specimen. The aim of our work is to analyse the concordance of results between slough and swab samples for cultures. A single-centre, retrospective, cross-sectional study involving patients (n = 131) with hard to heal wounds was conducted from October 2022 to October 2023. Pairs of slough and swab samples were collected for microbiological analysis and subdivided depending on whether a relatively clean wound bed was obtained. Swab samples were collected using the Levine and deep pus methods, Cohen's κ coefficients calculated to evaluate concordance, and microbiological agreement analysed. Gram-stain results did not differ significantly between slough and swab samples (𝜒<sup>2</sup> = 329.287, p = 0.688; concordance, κ = 0.879, p < 0.001); microbiological agreement was 90.1%. Samples from 87 patients with relatively clean wound beds generated excellent concordance between slough and Levine technique (κ = 0.867, p < 0.001; microbiological agreement, 89.7%). In 44 patients with slough and deep pus swab where a relatively clean wound bed could not be obtained, Gram-stain also demonstrated excellent concordance (κ = 0.898, p < 0.001; microbiology agreement, 90.9%). Our data provide evidence that slough is a reliable wound specimen from hard to heal wounds for microbiology culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":23864,"journal":{"name":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","volume":"33 1","pages":"e70002"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of slough in wounds for the diagnosis of microbiology cultivation.\",\"authors\":\"Yunfeng Li, Meng Cai, Nan Li, Hua Zhang, Ershun Huang, Jinghui Zhao, Mei Jin, Long Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/wrr.70002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Slough is not currently a recommended microbiology culture specimen. The aim of our work is to analyse the concordance of results between slough and swab samples for cultures. A single-centre, retrospective, cross-sectional study involving patients (n = 131) with hard to heal wounds was conducted from October 2022 to October 2023. Pairs of slough and swab samples were collected for microbiological analysis and subdivided depending on whether a relatively clean wound bed was obtained. Swab samples were collected using the Levine and deep pus methods, Cohen's κ coefficients calculated to evaluate concordance, and microbiological agreement analysed. Gram-stain results did not differ significantly between slough and swab samples (𝜒<sup>2</sup> = 329.287, p = 0.688; concordance, κ = 0.879, p < 0.001); microbiological agreement was 90.1%. Samples from 87 patients with relatively clean wound beds generated excellent concordance between slough and Levine technique (κ = 0.867, p < 0.001; microbiological agreement, 89.7%). In 44 patients with slough and deep pus swab where a relatively clean wound bed could not be obtained, Gram-stain also demonstrated excellent concordance (κ = 0.898, p < 0.001; microbiology agreement, 90.9%). Our data provide evidence that slough is a reliable wound specimen from hard to heal wounds for microbiology culture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wound Repair and Regeneration\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"e70002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wound Repair and Regeneration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.70002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.70002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The value of slough in wounds for the diagnosis of microbiology cultivation.
Slough is not currently a recommended microbiology culture specimen. The aim of our work is to analyse the concordance of results between slough and swab samples for cultures. A single-centre, retrospective, cross-sectional study involving patients (n = 131) with hard to heal wounds was conducted from October 2022 to October 2023. Pairs of slough and swab samples were collected for microbiological analysis and subdivided depending on whether a relatively clean wound bed was obtained. Swab samples were collected using the Levine and deep pus methods, Cohen's κ coefficients calculated to evaluate concordance, and microbiological agreement analysed. Gram-stain results did not differ significantly between slough and swab samples (𝜒2 = 329.287, p = 0.688; concordance, κ = 0.879, p < 0.001); microbiological agreement was 90.1%. Samples from 87 patients with relatively clean wound beds generated excellent concordance between slough and Levine technique (κ = 0.867, p < 0.001; microbiological agreement, 89.7%). In 44 patients with slough and deep pus swab where a relatively clean wound bed could not be obtained, Gram-stain also demonstrated excellent concordance (κ = 0.898, p < 0.001; microbiology agreement, 90.9%). Our data provide evidence that slough is a reliable wound specimen from hard to heal wounds for microbiology culture.
期刊介绍:
Wound Repair and Regeneration provides extensive international coverage of cellular and molecular biology, connective tissue, and biological mediator studies in the field of tissue repair and regeneration and serves a diverse audience of surgeons, plastic surgeons, dermatologists, biochemists, cell biologists, and others.
Wound Repair and Regeneration is the official journal of The Wound Healing Society, The European Tissue Repair Society, The Japanese Society for Wound Healing, and The Australian Wound Management Association.