点阵放疗中高剂量顶点的数目和位置对等效均匀剂量和峰谷比的影响。

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_97_24
A T Bhagyalakshmi, Velayudham Ramasubramanian
{"title":"点阵放疗中高剂量顶点的数目和位置对等效均匀剂量和峰谷比的影响。","authors":"A T Bhagyalakshmi, Velayudham Ramasubramanian","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_97_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study evaluated the influence of high dose (HD) vertex numbers and its placement on equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) in lattice radiotherapy (LRT).</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>One hundred and eighty-eight RapidArc (RA) plans were created for a cohort of 15 patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>RA plans were created with zero to eight HD vertices to analyze their relationship with EUD. Eight lattices were systematically and optimally placed (by avoiding proximity to organs at risks [OARs]) to study the impact of vertex placement. Variations in PVDR were assessed using PVDR1 (mean dose to HD vertices by the difference of mean doses to planning target volume [PTV] and HD vertices) and PVDR2 (D10/D90 of PTV in composite plans) across 38 RA plans with HD vertex doses of 9 Gy, 12 Gy, 15 Gy, and 18 Gy. PVDR3 (product of PVDR1 and PVDR2) was evaluated for its variation with peak dose.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Hypothesis testing between vertex placements was performed using a two-tailed Student's <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EUD values ranged from 32.88 Gy to 40.63 Gy. In addition, statistical analysis revealed significant associations (<i>P</i> = 0.0074) between the placement patterns of HD vertices, both in systematic and optimized arrangements. The PVDR and D10/D90 product values were 1.6, 1.8, 2.1, and 2.3 for peak doses of 9 Gy, 12 Gy, 15 Gy, and 18 Gy, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of one HD vertex increased EUD, emphasizing the impact of individual vertex increments on outcomes. Systematic and optimized vertex placements enhance EUD, with optimized placement yielding better doses to PTV and OARs. PVDR3 offers superior dose reporting for LRT compared to PVDR1 and PVDR2.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"49 4","pages":"493-501"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Number and Placement of High-dose Vertices on Equivalent Uniform Dose and Peak-to-valley Ratio for Lattice Radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"A T Bhagyalakshmi, Velayudham Ramasubramanian\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmp.jmp_97_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study evaluated the influence of high dose (HD) vertex numbers and its placement on equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) in lattice radiotherapy (LRT).</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>One hundred and eighty-eight RapidArc (RA) plans were created for a cohort of 15 patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>RA plans were created with zero to eight HD vertices to analyze their relationship with EUD. Eight lattices were systematically and optimally placed (by avoiding proximity to organs at risks [OARs]) to study the impact of vertex placement. Variations in PVDR were assessed using PVDR1 (mean dose to HD vertices by the difference of mean doses to planning target volume [PTV] and HD vertices) and PVDR2 (D10/D90 of PTV in composite plans) across 38 RA plans with HD vertex doses of 9 Gy, 12 Gy, 15 Gy, and 18 Gy. PVDR3 (product of PVDR1 and PVDR2) was evaluated for its variation with peak dose.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Hypothesis testing between vertex placements was performed using a two-tailed Student's <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EUD values ranged from 32.88 Gy to 40.63 Gy. In addition, statistical analysis revealed significant associations (<i>P</i> = 0.0074) between the placement patterns of HD vertices, both in systematic and optimized arrangements. The PVDR and D10/D90 product values were 1.6, 1.8, 2.1, and 2.3 for peak doses of 9 Gy, 12 Gy, 15 Gy, and 18 Gy, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of one HD vertex increased EUD, emphasizing the impact of individual vertex increments on outcomes. Systematic and optimized vertex placements enhance EUD, with optimized placement yielding better doses to PTV and OARs. PVDR3 offers superior dose reporting for LRT compared to PVDR1 and PVDR2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"49 4\",\"pages\":\"493-501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801099/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_97_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_97_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估了点阵放疗(LRT)中高剂量(HD)顶点数及其位置对等效均匀剂量(EUD)和峰谷剂量比(PVDR)的影响。设置和设计:为15名患者创建了188个RapidArc (RA)计划。材料和方法:创建具有0到8个HD顶点的RA平面图,分析其与EUD的关系。系统地、最佳地放置8个网格(通过避免靠近危险器官[OARs])来研究顶点放置的影响。使用PVDR1(计划靶体积[PTV]和HD顶点的平均剂量之差)和PVDR2(综合方案中PTV的D10/D90)评估38个RA方案中PVDR的变化,HD顶点剂量分别为9 Gy、12 Gy、15 Gy和18 Gy。评估PVDR3 (PVDR1和PVDR2的产物)随峰值剂量的变化。使用的统计分析:顶点放置之间的假设检验采用双尾学生t检验。结果:EUD值为32.88 ~ 40.63 Gy。此外,统计分析显示,HD顶点在系统排列和优化排列中的放置模式之间存在显著相关性(P = 0.0074)。在9 Gy、12 Gy、15 Gy和18 Gy的峰值剂量下,PVDR和D10/D90产物值分别为1.6、1.8、2.1和2.3。结论:增加一个HD顶点会增加EUD,强调单个顶点增量对结果的影响。系统和优化的顶点位置可以提高EUD,优化的位置可以产生更好的PTV和OARs剂量。与PVDR1和PVDR2相比,PVDR3提供了更好的LRT剂量报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Number and Placement of High-dose Vertices on Equivalent Uniform Dose and Peak-to-valley Ratio for Lattice Radiotherapy.

Aims: This study evaluated the influence of high dose (HD) vertex numbers and its placement on equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) in lattice radiotherapy (LRT).

Settings and design: One hundred and eighty-eight RapidArc (RA) plans were created for a cohort of 15 patients.

Materials and methods: RA plans were created with zero to eight HD vertices to analyze their relationship with EUD. Eight lattices were systematically and optimally placed (by avoiding proximity to organs at risks [OARs]) to study the impact of vertex placement. Variations in PVDR were assessed using PVDR1 (mean dose to HD vertices by the difference of mean doses to planning target volume [PTV] and HD vertices) and PVDR2 (D10/D90 of PTV in composite plans) across 38 RA plans with HD vertex doses of 9 Gy, 12 Gy, 15 Gy, and 18 Gy. PVDR3 (product of PVDR1 and PVDR2) was evaluated for its variation with peak dose.

Statistical analysis used: Hypothesis testing between vertex placements was performed using a two-tailed Student's t-test.

Results: EUD values ranged from 32.88 Gy to 40.63 Gy. In addition, statistical analysis revealed significant associations (P = 0.0074) between the placement patterns of HD vertices, both in systematic and optimized arrangements. The PVDR and D10/D90 product values were 1.6, 1.8, 2.1, and 2.3 for peak doses of 9 Gy, 12 Gy, 15 Gy, and 18 Gy, respectively.

Conclusions: The addition of one HD vertex increased EUD, emphasizing the impact of individual vertex increments on outcomes. Systematic and optimized vertex placements enhance EUD, with optimized placement yielding better doses to PTV and OARs. PVDR3 offers superior dose reporting for LRT compared to PVDR1 and PVDR2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Physics
Journal of Medical Physics RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Axis-specific Set-up Errors in Rectal Cancer Radiotherapy: A Prospective Cone-beam Computed Tomography-Based Study with Body Mass Index Correlation. Assessment of 177Lu Production through 176Yb Target Bombardment using Deuteron Particles and Back-Shifted Fermi Gas Model. Comparison of Dosiomics Features and Dosimetric Parameters for Detecting Variations in Dose Distribution in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy. Breast Glandularity Distribution and Refining the Mean Glandular Dose Estimates in Digital Mammography. Commissioning of Bilateral (Parallel Opposed) Extended Source-to-surface Distance Total Body Irradiation Technique and Its Long-term Stability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1