新西兰奥特罗阿的道路游说和不健康的交通政策话语:框架分析

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2025.101999
Alice Miller , Emma Osborne , Richard Edwards , Alex Macmillan , Caroline Shaw
{"title":"新西兰奥特罗阿的道路游说和不健康的交通政策话语:框架分析","authors":"Alice Miller ,&nbsp;Emma Osborne ,&nbsp;Richard Edwards ,&nbsp;Alex Macmillan ,&nbsp;Caroline Shaw","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.101999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transport is an important determinant of population health. Decarbonisation of the transport system is also a critical part of climate policy with additional health co-benefits to be gained by reducing car dependence. Despite this knowledge, there has been inadequate progress in transport policy to protect the health of people and the planet.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To discover whether commercial entities in the road transport sector of Aotearoa New Zealand are using techniques common to other harmful commodity industries to influence transport policy to further their interests at the expense of health.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used qualitative document analysis to describe a sample of road transport interest groups and analyse the framing and arguments these organisations used in submissions to national transport and climate change policy consultations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The examined “road lobby” included commercial organisations representing the automotive, road freight and energy industries. These organisations were well-resourced and undertook political activities intended to influence government policy. They supported policies that promoted private vehicles and investment in their supporting infrastructure whilst opposing the reallocation of transport funding from roads to low-carbon transport modes and tighter regulation of vehicle emissions. Submissions used similar framings to those commonly used by other unhealthy industries but with different arguments relating to road safety and transport funding. We identified some “circular policy-blocking arguments” that countered policies designed for mode shift and climate mitigation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Public health should use commercial determinants of health frameworks to guide action on transport. Transport policymakers should ensure that vested interests do not distort policy choices and that decision-making frameworks accurately reflect the short and long-term harms of different transport modes. Further research is needed to determine to what extent the “road lobby” influences policy outcomes, and if other techniques of influence are being employed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101999"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The road lobby and unhealthy transport policy discourse in Aotearoa New Zealand: A framing analysis\",\"authors\":\"Alice Miller ,&nbsp;Emma Osborne ,&nbsp;Richard Edwards ,&nbsp;Alex Macmillan ,&nbsp;Caroline Shaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jth.2025.101999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Transport is an important determinant of population health. Decarbonisation of the transport system is also a critical part of climate policy with additional health co-benefits to be gained by reducing car dependence. Despite this knowledge, there has been inadequate progress in transport policy to protect the health of people and the planet.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To discover whether commercial entities in the road transport sector of Aotearoa New Zealand are using techniques common to other harmful commodity industries to influence transport policy to further their interests at the expense of health.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used qualitative document analysis to describe a sample of road transport interest groups and analyse the framing and arguments these organisations used in submissions to national transport and climate change policy consultations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The examined “road lobby” included commercial organisations representing the automotive, road freight and energy industries. These organisations were well-resourced and undertook political activities intended to influence government policy. They supported policies that promoted private vehicles and investment in their supporting infrastructure whilst opposing the reallocation of transport funding from roads to low-carbon transport modes and tighter regulation of vehicle emissions. Submissions used similar framings to those commonly used by other unhealthy industries but with different arguments relating to road safety and transport funding. We identified some “circular policy-blocking arguments” that countered policies designed for mode shift and climate mitigation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Public health should use commercial determinants of health frameworks to guide action on transport. Transport policymakers should ensure that vested interests do not distort policy choices and that decision-making frameworks accurately reflect the short and long-term harms of different transport modes. Further research is needed to determine to what extent the “road lobby” influences policy outcomes, and if other techniques of influence are being employed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101999\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000192\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

交通是人口健康的一个重要决定因素。交通运输系统的脱碳也是气候政策的重要组成部分,通过减少对汽车的依赖,还可以获得额外的健康效益。尽管有这方面的知识,但在保护人类和地球健康的运输政策方面进展不足。目的:查明新西兰奥特罗阿公路运输部门的商业实体是否在使用其他有害商品行业所共有的技术来影响运输政策,以牺牲健康为代价促进其利益。方法我们使用定性文件分析来描述道路运输利益集团的样本,并分析这些组织在提交给国家运输和气候变化政策磋商时使用的框架和论点。结果调查的“公路游说团”包括代表汽车、公路货运和能源行业的商业机构。这些组织资源充足,从事旨在影响政府政策的政治活动。他们支持促进私人车辆和对其配套基础设施投资的政策,同时反对将交通运输资金从公路重新分配给低碳交通方式,并加强对车辆排放的监管。意见书使用了与其他不健康行业常用的框架类似的框架,但在道路安全和运输资金方面有不同的论点。我们确定了一些“循环政策阻碍论点”,这些论点反对为模式转变和减缓气候变化而设计的政策。结论公共卫生部门应利用商业健康决定因素框架来指导交通运输行动。交通政策制定者应确保既得利益不会扭曲政策选择,并确保决策框架准确反映不同运输模式的短期和长期危害。需要进一步研究,以确定“公路游说团”对政策结果的影响程度,以及是否正在采用其他影响手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The road lobby and unhealthy transport policy discourse in Aotearoa New Zealand: A framing analysis
Transport is an important determinant of population health. Decarbonisation of the transport system is also a critical part of climate policy with additional health co-benefits to be gained by reducing car dependence. Despite this knowledge, there has been inadequate progress in transport policy to protect the health of people and the planet.

Aim

To discover whether commercial entities in the road transport sector of Aotearoa New Zealand are using techniques common to other harmful commodity industries to influence transport policy to further their interests at the expense of health.

Methods

We used qualitative document analysis to describe a sample of road transport interest groups and analyse the framing and arguments these organisations used in submissions to national transport and climate change policy consultations.

Results

The examined “road lobby” included commercial organisations representing the automotive, road freight and energy industries. These organisations were well-resourced and undertook political activities intended to influence government policy. They supported policies that promoted private vehicles and investment in their supporting infrastructure whilst opposing the reallocation of transport funding from roads to low-carbon transport modes and tighter regulation of vehicle emissions. Submissions used similar framings to those commonly used by other unhealthy industries but with different arguments relating to road safety and transport funding. We identified some “circular policy-blocking arguments” that countered policies designed for mode shift and climate mitigation.

Conclusion

Public health should use commercial determinants of health frameworks to guide action on transport. Transport policymakers should ensure that vested interests do not distort policy choices and that decision-making frameworks accurately reflect the short and long-term harms of different transport modes. Further research is needed to determine to what extent the “road lobby” influences policy outcomes, and if other techniques of influence are being employed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Exploring perceptions of the barrier effect and their associations with travel mode choice and interactions with neighbours in Santiago, Chile Motion sickness in autonomous driving: Environmental, individual, and time effects Understanding neighborhood walkability perceptions and assessment practices by community: Rural, suburban, and urban settings: A cross-sectional study Eye-tracking and visual processing tests for assessing driving ability in individuals with dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A pilot study Pedestrian fatality in global context: Economic growth, urbanization, and the role of inequality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1