{"title":"射流边缘技术:单中心回顾性研究使用导丝偏置法治疗偏心严重钙化病变的射流动脉粥样硬化切除术的结果。","authors":"Shuko Iwata, Michinao Tan, Takashi Miwa, Wataru Sasaki, Kazushi Urasawa","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The Jetstream device is an effective treatment option for debulking calcified lesions; however, it carries a risk of damaging the healthy vessel wall. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Jetstream device combined with wire bias adjustments for treating eccentric calcified lesions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of JET EDGE technique for treating eccentric calcified lesions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This single-center, retrospective, nonrandomized observational study was conducted at a cardiovascular department in Japan. It included patients aged ≥ 20 years with eccentric calcified lesions (Rutherford classification 3−6) who underwent endovascular therapy using the Jetstream catheter for femoropopliteal disease between October 2022 and September 2024.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-eight lesions in 28 patients (28.6% female; mean age: 76.9 ± 7.3 years) with a mean follow-up period of 409 ± 174 days were analyzed. All lesions were graded 3 or 4 on the peripheral arterial calcium scoring system. The procedural success rate was 96.4%. No vascular perforations or medial layer damage were observed on imaging following the use of the Jetstream catheter. The 1-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for primary patency, freedom from major adverse limb events, and freedom from target lesion revascularization were 88.6%, 88.1%, and 91.3%, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study demonstrates that eccentric calcified lesions, which pose a risk of damaging the healthy vessel wall during treatment with the Jetstream catheter, can be safely treated by adjusting the wire bias during the procedure.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"105 5","pages":"1222-1229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"JET EDGE Technique: Results of a Single-Center Retrospective Study of Jetstream Atherectomy Using the Guidewire Bias Method for Eccentric Severely Calcified Lesions\",\"authors\":\"Shuko Iwata, Michinao Tan, Takashi Miwa, Wataru Sasaki, Kazushi Urasawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Jetstream device is an effective treatment option for debulking calcified lesions; however, it carries a risk of damaging the healthy vessel wall. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Jetstream device combined with wire bias adjustments for treating eccentric calcified lesions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of JET EDGE technique for treating eccentric calcified lesions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This single-center, retrospective, nonrandomized observational study was conducted at a cardiovascular department in Japan. It included patients aged ≥ 20 years with eccentric calcified lesions (Rutherford classification 3−6) who underwent endovascular therapy using the Jetstream catheter for femoropopliteal disease between October 2022 and September 2024.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-eight lesions in 28 patients (28.6% female; mean age: 76.9 ± 7.3 years) with a mean follow-up period of 409 ± 174 days were analyzed. All lesions were graded 3 or 4 on the peripheral arterial calcium scoring system. The procedural success rate was 96.4%. No vascular perforations or medial layer damage were observed on imaging following the use of the Jetstream catheter. The 1-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for primary patency, freedom from major adverse limb events, and freedom from target lesion revascularization were 88.6%, 88.1%, and 91.3%, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective study demonstrates that eccentric calcified lesions, which pose a risk of damaging the healthy vessel wall during treatment with the Jetstream catheter, can be safely treated by adjusting the wire bias during the procedure.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\"105 5\",\"pages\":\"1222-1229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31452\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31452","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
JET EDGE Technique: Results of a Single-Center Retrospective Study of Jetstream Atherectomy Using the Guidewire Bias Method for Eccentric Severely Calcified Lesions
Background
The Jetstream device is an effective treatment option for debulking calcified lesions; however, it carries a risk of damaging the healthy vessel wall. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Jetstream device combined with wire bias adjustments for treating eccentric calcified lesions.
Aims
The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of JET EDGE technique for treating eccentric calcified lesions.
Methods
This single-center, retrospective, nonrandomized observational study was conducted at a cardiovascular department in Japan. It included patients aged ≥ 20 years with eccentric calcified lesions (Rutherford classification 3−6) who underwent endovascular therapy using the Jetstream catheter for femoropopliteal disease between October 2022 and September 2024.
Results
Twenty-eight lesions in 28 patients (28.6% female; mean age: 76.9 ± 7.3 years) with a mean follow-up period of 409 ± 174 days were analyzed. All lesions were graded 3 or 4 on the peripheral arterial calcium scoring system. The procedural success rate was 96.4%. No vascular perforations or medial layer damage were observed on imaging following the use of the Jetstream catheter. The 1-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for primary patency, freedom from major adverse limb events, and freedom from target lesion revascularization were 88.6%, 88.1%, and 91.3%, respectively.
Conclusions
This retrospective study demonstrates that eccentric calcified lesions, which pose a risk of damaging the healthy vessel wall during treatment with the Jetstream catheter, can be safely treated by adjusting the wire bias during the procedure.
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.