c反应蛋白-白蛋白比值作为终末期癌症患者预后指标的临床意义

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0471
Koji Amano, Satomi Okamura, Tomofumi Miura, Vickie E Baracos, Naoharu Mori, Tatsuma Sakaguchi, Yu Uneno, Hiroto Ishiki, Yusuke Hiratsuka, Naosuke Yokomichi, Jun Hamano, Mika Baba, Masanori Mori, Tatsuya Morita
{"title":"c反应蛋白-白蛋白比值作为终末期癌症患者预后指标的临床意义","authors":"Koji Amano, Satomi Okamura, Tomofumi Miura, Vickie E Baracos, Naoharu Mori, Tatsuma Sakaguchi, Yu Uneno, Hiroto Ishiki, Yusuke Hiratsuka, Naosuke Yokomichi, Jun Hamano, Mika Baba, Masanori Mori, Tatsuya Morita","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Few studies investigated the clinical implications of C-reactive protein-albumin ratio (CAR) in palliative care. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To determine the association of CAR with overall survival among terminally ill patients with cance. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Datasets were obtained through two multicenter prospective cohort studies. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> Patients newly referred to palliative care. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> Physicians recorded measures at the baseline. Patients were followed up to their death or observed for 6 months. The patients in cohort 2 were divided using the CAR cutoffs detected using a piecewise linear hazards model in cohort 1. We performed time-to-event analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for patients in cohort 2. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1554 patients in cohort 1 and 1517 patients in cohort 2 were eligible. The cutoffs were 0.1, 1.2, and 6.4. The patients in cohort 2 were divided into four categories (<0.1 [<i>n</i> = 103], 0.1-1.2 [<i>n</i> = 433], 1.2-6.4 [712], and ≥6.4 [<i>n</i> = 269]). The adjusted <i>p</i> values of the log-rank tests were <0.001. Significantly higher risks of mortality were observed in the Cox proportional hazard model for the higher categories than in the lowest category (CAR 0.1-1.2: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.89; CAR 1.2-6.4: adjusted HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.65-2.62; CAR ≥6.4: adjusted HR 2.94, 95% CI 2.29-3.79). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Patients with a higher CAR had significantly higher risks of mortality than those with a lower CAR.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"592-600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Implications of the C-Reactive Protein-Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Koji Amano, Satomi Okamura, Tomofumi Miura, Vickie E Baracos, Naoharu Mori, Tatsuma Sakaguchi, Yu Uneno, Hiroto Ishiki, Yusuke Hiratsuka, Naosuke Yokomichi, Jun Hamano, Mika Baba, Masanori Mori, Tatsuya Morita\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jpm.2024.0471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Few studies investigated the clinical implications of C-reactive protein-albumin ratio (CAR) in palliative care. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To determine the association of CAR with overall survival among terminally ill patients with cance. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Datasets were obtained through two multicenter prospective cohort studies. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> Patients newly referred to palliative care. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> Physicians recorded measures at the baseline. Patients were followed up to their death or observed for 6 months. The patients in cohort 2 were divided using the CAR cutoffs detected using a piecewise linear hazards model in cohort 1. We performed time-to-event analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for patients in cohort 2. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1554 patients in cohort 1 and 1517 patients in cohort 2 were eligible. The cutoffs were 0.1, 1.2, and 6.4. The patients in cohort 2 were divided into four categories (<0.1 [<i>n</i> = 103], 0.1-1.2 [<i>n</i> = 433], 1.2-6.4 [712], and ≥6.4 [<i>n</i> = 269]). The adjusted <i>p</i> values of the log-rank tests were <0.001. Significantly higher risks of mortality were observed in the Cox proportional hazard model for the higher categories than in the lowest category (CAR 0.1-1.2: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.89; CAR 1.2-6.4: adjusted HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.65-2.62; CAR ≥6.4: adjusted HR 2.94, 95% CI 2.29-3.79). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Patients with a higher CAR had significantly higher risks of mortality than those with a lower CAR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"592-600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0471\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0471","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:很少有研究调查c反应蛋白-白蛋白比(CAR)在姑息治疗中的临床意义。目的:确定CAR与晚期癌症患者总生存率的关系。设计:数据集通过两个多中心前瞻性队列研究获得。背景/对象:新近接受姑息治疗的患者。测量:医生在基线记录测量值。随访至死亡或观察6个月。队列2的患者使用使用队列1的分段线性危险模型检测到的CAR截止值进行分组。我们对队列2的患者使用Kaplan-Meier方法和log-rank检验以及单因素和多因素Cox回归分析进行了时间-事件分析。结果:队列1共有1554例患者符合条件,队列2共有1517例患者符合条件。截止值分别为0.1、1.2和6.4。队列2的患者分为4组(n = 103)、0.1-1.2 [n = 433]、1.2-6.4[712]和≥6.4 [n = 269])。经对数秩检验调整后的p值为:结论:CAR较高的患者的死亡风险明显高于CAR较低的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Implications of the C-Reactive Protein-Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer.

Background: Few studies investigated the clinical implications of C-reactive protein-albumin ratio (CAR) in palliative care. Objectives: To determine the association of CAR with overall survival among terminally ill patients with cance. Design: Datasets were obtained through two multicenter prospective cohort studies. Setting/Subjects: Patients newly referred to palliative care. Measurements: Physicians recorded measures at the baseline. Patients were followed up to their death or observed for 6 months. The patients in cohort 2 were divided using the CAR cutoffs detected using a piecewise linear hazards model in cohort 1. We performed time-to-event analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for patients in cohort 2. Results: A total of 1554 patients in cohort 1 and 1517 patients in cohort 2 were eligible. The cutoffs were 0.1, 1.2, and 6.4. The patients in cohort 2 were divided into four categories (<0.1 [n = 103], 0.1-1.2 [n = 433], 1.2-6.4 [712], and ≥6.4 [n = 269]). The adjusted p values of the log-rank tests were <0.001. Significantly higher risks of mortality were observed in the Cox proportional hazard model for the higher categories than in the lowest category (CAR 0.1-1.2: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.89; CAR 1.2-6.4: adjusted HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.65-2.62; CAR ≥6.4: adjusted HR 2.94, 95% CI 2.29-3.79). Conclusions: Patients with a higher CAR had significantly higher risks of mortality than those with a lower CAR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
期刊最新文献
"We Talk About Everything": Experiences with Digital Health Communication in Palliative Care. Cultural Adaptation and Pilot Implementation of Education in Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Emergency Physicians (EPEC-EM) for Emergency Medicine Practice in Japan. Bereaved Caregiver Perspectives on Quality of Care at the End of Life Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer. Left Behind: Addressing the Impact of Family Separation Due to Immigration Policies on the Suffering of Patients with Advanced Cancer. Implementation of Structured Oncologist Communication Skills Training within the Improving Goal Concordant Care Initiative: Lessons Learned and Future Progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1