开发和验证综合姑息治疗结果量表简短形式有效专科姑息治疗筛查肿瘤(ScreeningPALL):一项横断面研究。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0343
Evelyn Müller, Michael J Müller, Paul Sölder, Beate Rautenberg, Maryam En-Nosse, Gerhild Becker
{"title":"开发和验证综合姑息治疗结果量表简短形式有效专科姑息治疗筛查肿瘤(ScreeningPALL):一项横断面研究。","authors":"Evelyn Müller, Michael J Müller, Paul Sölder, Beate Rautenberg, Maryam En-Nosse, Gerhild Becker","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Widespread implementation of specialist palliative care screening in oncology can be facilitated by efficient screening tools. It has been shown that patient-reported outcome measures are useful as screening tools and might reduce staff effort. Short forms could further improve feasibility. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> Development and validation of a short form of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) for use as a screening tool for specialist palliative care need in patients with incurable cancer. <b><i>Design:</i></b> In a cross-sectional study, patients completed the IPOS. In an independent process, the palliative care consultation service assessed specialist palliative care need in each patient through multiprofessional case review (reference standard). Statistical analysis included bootstrapping and binary logistic regression to select suitable items for an IPOS short form and receiver operating characteristics analyses for validation. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> The analysis included 205 hospital episodes of 194 inpatients and outpatients with incurable cancer (prognosis <2 years) at a German Comprehensive Cancer Center. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Possible IPOS short forms of two to eight items showed acceptable or excellent accuracy in predicting specialist palliative care need. A six-item IPOS short form that included the most predictive items of each of the three IPOS dimensions identified specialist palliative care need with 87.5% sensitivity (specificity = 56.4%; area under the curve = 0.786). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> IPOS short forms can facilitate efficient screening for specialist palliative care need, and the validation results are comparable to the full version of IPOS. Results also indicate which symptoms and problems might be most relevant as red flags in routine data or staff-based screening approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"453-460"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale Short Form for Efficient Specialist Palliative Care Screening in Oncology (ScreeningPALL): A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Evelyn Müller, Michael J Müller, Paul Sölder, Beate Rautenberg, Maryam En-Nosse, Gerhild Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jpm.2024.0343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Widespread implementation of specialist palliative care screening in oncology can be facilitated by efficient screening tools. It has been shown that patient-reported outcome measures are useful as screening tools and might reduce staff effort. Short forms could further improve feasibility. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> Development and validation of a short form of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) for use as a screening tool for specialist palliative care need in patients with incurable cancer. <b><i>Design:</i></b> In a cross-sectional study, patients completed the IPOS. In an independent process, the palliative care consultation service assessed specialist palliative care need in each patient through multiprofessional case review (reference standard). Statistical analysis included bootstrapping and binary logistic regression to select suitable items for an IPOS short form and receiver operating characteristics analyses for validation. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> The analysis included 205 hospital episodes of 194 inpatients and outpatients with incurable cancer (prognosis <2 years) at a German Comprehensive Cancer Center. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Possible IPOS short forms of two to eight items showed acceptable or excellent accuracy in predicting specialist palliative care need. A six-item IPOS short form that included the most predictive items of each of the three IPOS dimensions identified specialist palliative care need with 87.5% sensitivity (specificity = 56.4%; area under the curve = 0.786). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> IPOS short forms can facilitate efficient screening for specialist palliative care need, and the validation results are comparable to the full version of IPOS. Results also indicate which symptoms and problems might be most relevant as red flags in routine data or staff-based screening approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"453-460\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0343\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高效的筛查工具可以促进肿瘤专科姑息治疗筛查的广泛实施。研究表明,患者报告的结果测量作为筛查工具是有用的,并可能减少工作人员的努力。简短的形式可以进一步提高可行性。目的:开发和验证一种简短形式的综合姑息治疗结果量表(IPOS),作为无法治愈的癌症患者专科姑息治疗需求的筛查工具。设计:在横断面研究中,患者完成IPOS。在一个独立的过程中,姑息治疗咨询服务通过多专业病例审查(参考标准)评估每个患者的专科姑息治疗需求。统计分析包括自举和二元逻辑回归,以选择适合IPOS简短形式的项目,并对接收者操作特征进行验证分析。背景/对象:分析包括194例无法治愈的癌症住院患者和门诊患者的205次住院事件(预后结果:可能的IPOS简短形式为2至8个项目,在预测专科姑息治疗需求方面显示出可接受或极好的准确性。一份包含六个项目的IPOS简短表格,其中包括三个IPOS维度中每个维度最具预测性的项目,以87.5%的灵敏度确定了专科姑息治疗需求(特异性= 56.4%;曲线下面积= 0.786)。结论:IPOS简短表格可以促进对专科姑息治疗需求的有效筛选,验证结果与IPOS完整版本相当。结果还表明,哪些症状和问题可能是常规数据或基于工作人员的筛查方法中最相关的危险信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and Validation of Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale Short Form for Efficient Specialist Palliative Care Screening in Oncology (ScreeningPALL): A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Widespread implementation of specialist palliative care screening in oncology can be facilitated by efficient screening tools. It has been shown that patient-reported outcome measures are useful as screening tools and might reduce staff effort. Short forms could further improve feasibility. Objective: Development and validation of a short form of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) for use as a screening tool for specialist palliative care need in patients with incurable cancer. Design: In a cross-sectional study, patients completed the IPOS. In an independent process, the palliative care consultation service assessed specialist palliative care need in each patient through multiprofessional case review (reference standard). Statistical analysis included bootstrapping and binary logistic regression to select suitable items for an IPOS short form and receiver operating characteristics analyses for validation. Setting/Subjects: The analysis included 205 hospital episodes of 194 inpatients and outpatients with incurable cancer (prognosis <2 years) at a German Comprehensive Cancer Center. Results: Possible IPOS short forms of two to eight items showed acceptable or excellent accuracy in predicting specialist palliative care need. A six-item IPOS short form that included the most predictive items of each of the three IPOS dimensions identified specialist palliative care need with 87.5% sensitivity (specificity = 56.4%; area under the curve = 0.786). Conclusions: IPOS short forms can facilitate efficient screening for specialist palliative care need, and the validation results are comparable to the full version of IPOS. Results also indicate which symptoms and problems might be most relevant as red flags in routine data or staff-based screening approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
期刊最新文献
Palliative Care Research in Heart Failure: A Bibliometric Review. Patterns of Goals-of-Care Documentation in the Outpatient Oncology Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Older Adults with Advanced Cancer. Between Doors. Integrating Palliative Care in End-Stage Liver Disease: An Interprofessional Perspective on Communication, Terminology, and Educational Gaps. Fast Facts and Concepts Digital Legacy in Palliative Care #528.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1