电子同意(eConsent)在氯胺酮术后持久疼痛缓解(KALPAS)多中心试验中的使用。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S488917
Lisa V Doan, Jeri Burr, Raven Perez, Hamleini Martinez, Randy Cuevas, Kevin Watt, Jing Wang
{"title":"电子同意(eConsent)在氯胺酮术后持久疼痛缓解(KALPAS)多中心试验中的使用。","authors":"Lisa V Doan, Jeri Burr, Raven Perez, Hamleini Martinez, Randy Cuevas, Kevin Watt, Jing Wang","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S488917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The informed consent process has traditionally taken place in person. The introduction of electronic consent (eConsent) has made remote consenting processes possible. Use of eConsent has increased since the COVID-19 pandemic. It has streamlined the process of consenting patients and has been shown to benefit the research study team and participants.</p><p><strong>Econsent in the ketamine analgesia for long-lasting pain relief after surgery kalpas study: </strong>The KALPAS study is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled study investigating the effectiveness of ketamine in reducing chronic post-mastectomy pain in women undergoing mastectomy for oncologic indication. The study uses a two-part consent form consisting of a master consent with information applicable to all sites and site-specific information. All potential participants receive the full two-part consent form for review. When signing the eConsent, however, all potential participants are provided with a concise summary of the informed consent document, an approach not widely used by multicenter studies. eConsent has been noted to be beneficial to research staff when trying to gather informed consent from participants who live far away from the hospital, want to include their family and friends, and for researchers who can approach patients outside of their clinical appointments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ability to consent patients remotely has allowed for a flexible workflow within sites and a more patient-centric process that focuses on including loved ones in the discussion and scheduling time to speak to a principal investigator. Demand for eConsent will likely continue in the post-COVID era, and use of a concise summary can allow for a more efficient consenting process.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"589-595"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Electronic Consent (eConsent) Within the Ketamine for Long-Lasting Pain Relief After Surgery (KALPAS) Multicenter Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa V Doan, Jeri Burr, Raven Perez, Hamleini Martinez, Randy Cuevas, Kevin Watt, Jing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S488917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The informed consent process has traditionally taken place in person. The introduction of electronic consent (eConsent) has made remote consenting processes possible. Use of eConsent has increased since the COVID-19 pandemic. It has streamlined the process of consenting patients and has been shown to benefit the research study team and participants.</p><p><strong>Econsent in the ketamine analgesia for long-lasting pain relief after surgery kalpas study: </strong>The KALPAS study is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled study investigating the effectiveness of ketamine in reducing chronic post-mastectomy pain in women undergoing mastectomy for oncologic indication. The study uses a two-part consent form consisting of a master consent with information applicable to all sites and site-specific information. All potential participants receive the full two-part consent form for review. When signing the eConsent, however, all potential participants are provided with a concise summary of the informed consent document, an approach not widely used by multicenter studies. eConsent has been noted to be beneficial to research staff when trying to gather informed consent from participants who live far away from the hospital, want to include their family and friends, and for researchers who can approach patients outside of their clinical appointments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ability to consent patients remotely has allowed for a flexible workflow within sites and a more patient-centric process that focuses on including loved ones in the discussion and scheduling time to speak to a principal investigator. Demand for eConsent will likely continue in the post-COVID era, and use of a concise summary can allow for a more efficient consenting process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"589-595\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808973/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S488917\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S488917","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:知情同意过程传统上是亲自进行的。电子同意(eConsent)的引入使远程同意过程成为可能。自2019冠状病毒病大流行以来,eConsent的使用有所增加。它简化了患者同意的过程,并已被证明有利于研究团队和参与者。kalpas研究:kalpas研究是一项多中心、双盲、随机对照研究,旨在调查氯胺酮在减轻因肿瘤指征而接受乳房切除术的女性术后慢性疼痛方面的有效性。本研究采用两部分同意书,包括主同意书和适用于所有站点的信息以及特定站点的信息。所有潜在的参与者都将收到完整的两部分同意书以供审查。然而,在签署eConsent时,所有潜在的参与者都得到了一份知情同意文件的简明摘要,这种方法在多中心研究中并未广泛使用。人们注意到,当研究人员试图从远离医院的参与者那里收集知情同意时,eConsent对他们的家人和朋友都是有益的,对于研究人员来说,他们可以在临床预约之外接触病人。结论:远程同意患者的能力允许在站点内灵活的工作流程和更加以患者为中心的流程,重点是将亲人包括在讨论中,并安排时间与首席研究员交谈。在后covid时代,对eConsent的需求可能会继续,使用简洁的摘要可以实现更有效的同意过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Use of Electronic Consent (eConsent) Within the Ketamine for Long-Lasting Pain Relief After Surgery (KALPAS) Multicenter Trial.

Background: The informed consent process has traditionally taken place in person. The introduction of electronic consent (eConsent) has made remote consenting processes possible. Use of eConsent has increased since the COVID-19 pandemic. It has streamlined the process of consenting patients and has been shown to benefit the research study team and participants.

Econsent in the ketamine analgesia for long-lasting pain relief after surgery kalpas study: The KALPAS study is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled study investigating the effectiveness of ketamine in reducing chronic post-mastectomy pain in women undergoing mastectomy for oncologic indication. The study uses a two-part consent form consisting of a master consent with information applicable to all sites and site-specific information. All potential participants receive the full two-part consent form for review. When signing the eConsent, however, all potential participants are provided with a concise summary of the informed consent document, an approach not widely used by multicenter studies. eConsent has been noted to be beneficial to research staff when trying to gather informed consent from participants who live far away from the hospital, want to include their family and friends, and for researchers who can approach patients outside of their clinical appointments.

Conclusion: The ability to consent patients remotely has allowed for a flexible workflow within sites and a more patient-centric process that focuses on including loved ones in the discussion and scheduling time to speak to a principal investigator. Demand for eConsent will likely continue in the post-COVID era, and use of a concise summary can allow for a more efficient consenting process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Therapy Using Single High-Dose S-Ketamine Infusion for Fibromyalgia: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Blinded-Endpoint Study Protocol. A Novel Single-Puncture Ultrasound-Guided Approach for Radiofrequency Treatment of the Articular Branches of Femoral and Obturator Nerves. Development of a High-Sensitivity Screening Tool for Neuropathic Pain Integrating PainDETECT and BS-POP Using Machine Learning. Proportion of Myofascial Pain Syndrome Among Patients with Diagnosed or Suspected Fibromyalgia: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study. A Critical Methodological Concern: Per-Protocol Analysis Undermines Randomization in Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery Analgesia Trial [Response to Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1