使用 SMALLSS 评分系统治疗颅内小动脉瘤:一种新型决策系统

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Acta Neurochirurgica Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1007/s00701-025-06453-3
Mira Salih, Michael Young, Thomas B Fodor, Alexander Andreev, Samuel D. Pettersson, Joanna M. Roy, Basel Musmar, Max Shutran, Phillip Taussky, Christopher S. Ogilvy
{"title":"使用 SMALLSS 评分系统治疗颅内小动脉瘤:一种新型决策系统","authors":"Mira Salih,&nbsp;Michael Young,&nbsp;Thomas B Fodor,&nbsp;Alexander Andreev,&nbsp;Samuel D. Pettersson,&nbsp;Joanna M. Roy,&nbsp;Basel Musmar,&nbsp;Max Shutran,&nbsp;Phillip Taussky,&nbsp;Christopher S. Ogilvy","doi":"10.1007/s00701-025-06453-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) less than 7 mm is controversial. We created a scoring system to guide decision making and validated the system utilizing over 700 cases treated with microsurgery or endovascular procedures.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The scoring system SMALLSS included Size, (4–7 mm: 1 point, &lt; 3.9 mm: 0 point), Multiple aneurysms (yes: 1, no: 0), <b>A</b>natomic location (posterior: 1, anterior: 0), Lineage- family history of aneurysm (yes:1, no: 0), Lifetime risk (age &lt; 65: 1, age &gt; 65: 0), <b>S</b>moking history (yes: 1, no: 0 ), <b>S</b>hape (irregular:1, smooth:0 ). Validation of this system was performed through retrospective review of prospectively maintained data for UIA patients treated between 2014 and 2021. We then performed an external validation of a cohort of 200 small aneurysms &lt; 7 mm treated at a high volume cerebrovascular center.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1152 cases with unruptured intracranial aneurysms were treated over the study interval, of which 771 aneurysms (66.9%) were under 7 mm, with the majority (64.3%) having SMALLSS score more than 2. Serious neurologic complications occurred in 18 out of 771 aneurysms (2.33%) of which 4 were hemorrhagic and 14 were ischemic. The obliteration rate was 98% in microsurgery group, 89.7% in endovascular group. During this same interval, 1126 patients with aneurysms &lt; 7 mm were evaluated and not offered treatment, with 74.7% SMALLSS scores of 2 and under. External validation data showed no significant deviations from our cohort with 150 out of 200 aneurysms (75%) with a SMALLSS score of 2 or greater.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The SMALLSS scoring system can be a good tool to guide treatment decision making for patients with small UIA. The risk of treatment did not increase with the projected increased risk of rupture and overall high obliteration rates were achieved with endovascular and surgical techniques.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06453-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of small intracranial aneurysms using the SMALLSS scoring system: a novel system for decision making\",\"authors\":\"Mira Salih,&nbsp;Michael Young,&nbsp;Thomas B Fodor,&nbsp;Alexander Andreev,&nbsp;Samuel D. Pettersson,&nbsp;Joanna M. Roy,&nbsp;Basel Musmar,&nbsp;Max Shutran,&nbsp;Phillip Taussky,&nbsp;Christopher S. Ogilvy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00701-025-06453-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) less than 7 mm is controversial. We created a scoring system to guide decision making and validated the system utilizing over 700 cases treated with microsurgery or endovascular procedures.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The scoring system SMALLSS included Size, (4–7 mm: 1 point, &lt; 3.9 mm: 0 point), Multiple aneurysms (yes: 1, no: 0), <b>A</b>natomic location (posterior: 1, anterior: 0), Lineage- family history of aneurysm (yes:1, no: 0), Lifetime risk (age &lt; 65: 1, age &gt; 65: 0), <b>S</b>moking history (yes: 1, no: 0 ), <b>S</b>hape (irregular:1, smooth:0 ). Validation of this system was performed through retrospective review of prospectively maintained data for UIA patients treated between 2014 and 2021. We then performed an external validation of a cohort of 200 small aneurysms &lt; 7 mm treated at a high volume cerebrovascular center.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1152 cases with unruptured intracranial aneurysms were treated over the study interval, of which 771 aneurysms (66.9%) were under 7 mm, with the majority (64.3%) having SMALLSS score more than 2. Serious neurologic complications occurred in 18 out of 771 aneurysms (2.33%) of which 4 were hemorrhagic and 14 were ischemic. The obliteration rate was 98% in microsurgery group, 89.7% in endovascular group. During this same interval, 1126 patients with aneurysms &lt; 7 mm were evaluated and not offered treatment, with 74.7% SMALLSS scores of 2 and under. External validation data showed no significant deviations from our cohort with 150 out of 200 aneurysms (75%) with a SMALLSS score of 2 or greater.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The SMALLSS scoring system can be a good tool to guide treatment decision making for patients with small UIA. The risk of treatment did not increase with the projected increased risk of rupture and overall high obliteration rates were achieved with endovascular and surgical techniques.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06453-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06453-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06453-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment of small intracranial aneurysms using the SMALLSS scoring system: a novel system for decision making

Background

Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) less than 7 mm is controversial. We created a scoring system to guide decision making and validated the system utilizing over 700 cases treated with microsurgery or endovascular procedures.

Methods

The scoring system SMALLSS included Size, (4–7 mm: 1 point, < 3.9 mm: 0 point), Multiple aneurysms (yes: 1, no: 0), Anatomic location (posterior: 1, anterior: 0), Lineage- family history of aneurysm (yes:1, no: 0), Lifetime risk (age < 65: 1, age > 65: 0), Smoking history (yes: 1, no: 0 ), Shape (irregular:1, smooth:0 ). Validation of this system was performed through retrospective review of prospectively maintained data for UIA patients treated between 2014 and 2021. We then performed an external validation of a cohort of 200 small aneurysms < 7 mm treated at a high volume cerebrovascular center.

Results

A total of 1152 cases with unruptured intracranial aneurysms were treated over the study interval, of which 771 aneurysms (66.9%) were under 7 mm, with the majority (64.3%) having SMALLSS score more than 2. Serious neurologic complications occurred in 18 out of 771 aneurysms (2.33%) of which 4 were hemorrhagic and 14 were ischemic. The obliteration rate was 98% in microsurgery group, 89.7% in endovascular group. During this same interval, 1126 patients with aneurysms < 7 mm were evaluated and not offered treatment, with 74.7% SMALLSS scores of 2 and under. External validation data showed no significant deviations from our cohort with 150 out of 200 aneurysms (75%) with a SMALLSS score of 2 or greater.

Conclusion

The SMALLSS scoring system can be a good tool to guide treatment decision making for patients with small UIA. The risk of treatment did not increase with the projected increased risk of rupture and overall high obliteration rates were achieved with endovascular and surgical techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
期刊最新文献
Fully endoscopic combined endonasal and supraorbital keyhole approach for tuberculum sellae meningiomas with marked lateral extension: How I do it Obituary Acad. Prof. Dr. Vinko V. Dolenc 1940 - 2025 The effect of music interventions compared to standard-of-care on the prevention of delirium in neurosurgical patients: an analysis of costs and cost-effectiveness based on the MUSYC-trial How I do it: Tentorial meningioma resection with combination of 3D exoscope and endoscope via subtemporal approach Treatment of small intracranial aneurysms using the SMALLSS scoring system: a novel system for decision making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1