胆道刷细胞学与快速现场细胞学评价对胆道恶性狭窄的检测效果。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1111/jgh.16865
Il Sang Shin, Jun Ho Myeong, Jong Ho Moon, Yun Nah Lee, Jae Woo Park, Hee Kyung Kim, Jae Kook Yang, Tae Hoon Lee, Young Deok Cho, Sang-Heum Park
{"title":"胆道刷细胞学与快速现场细胞学评价对胆道恶性狭窄的检测效果。","authors":"Il Sang Shin,&nbsp;Jun Ho Myeong,&nbsp;Jong Ho Moon,&nbsp;Yun Nah Lee,&nbsp;Jae Woo Park,&nbsp;Hee Kyung Kim,&nbsp;Jae Kook Yang,&nbsp;Tae Hoon Lee,&nbsp;Young Deok Cho,&nbsp;Sang-Heum Park","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Brush cytology is a widely used diagnostic method in conjunction with intraductal biopsies during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, but its diagnostic yield remains a limitation. This study evaluated the efficacy of biliary cytology using a newly developed brush device with rapid on-site cytological evaluation (ROSE) for detecting malignant biliary strictures (MBSs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 58 patients with suspected intrinsic MBS identified by intraductal ultrasound were enrolled. After achieving tissue sampling with ROSE through a maximum of two brushing passes, a transpapillary forceps biopsy (TPB) was performed. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy, and the secondary outcomes were technical success, sampling adequacy, and procedure-related adverse events.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Biliary cytology with ROSE was technically successful in all patients (58/58), with a sampling adequacy of 96.6% (56/58). The technical success and sampling adequacy of TPB were 94.8% (55/58) and 91.4% (53/58), respectively. Brush cytology with ROSE and TPB yielded sensitivity rates of 91.8% and 85.7%, specificity rates of 88.9% for both, and accuracy rates of 88.9% for both. The receiver operating characteristic curve comparing the diagnostic accuracies of brush cytology with ROSE and TPB combined versus TPB alone showed a significantly higher value for the combined approach (0.93) than TPB alone (0.87) (<i>p</i> = 0.010).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Biliary brush cytology using a novel brush device with ROSE is effective and can be used complementarily to TPB in patients with suspected MBS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":"40 3","pages":"750-756"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Biliary Brush Cytology With Rapid On-Site Cytological Evaluation for the Detection of Malignant Biliary Strictures\",\"authors\":\"Il Sang Shin,&nbsp;Jun Ho Myeong,&nbsp;Jong Ho Moon,&nbsp;Yun Nah Lee,&nbsp;Jae Woo Park,&nbsp;Hee Kyung Kim,&nbsp;Jae Kook Yang,&nbsp;Tae Hoon Lee,&nbsp;Young Deok Cho,&nbsp;Sang-Heum Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgh.16865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Brush cytology is a widely used diagnostic method in conjunction with intraductal biopsies during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, but its diagnostic yield remains a limitation. This study evaluated the efficacy of biliary cytology using a newly developed brush device with rapid on-site cytological evaluation (ROSE) for detecting malignant biliary strictures (MBSs).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 58 patients with suspected intrinsic MBS identified by intraductal ultrasound were enrolled. After achieving tissue sampling with ROSE through a maximum of two brushing passes, a transpapillary forceps biopsy (TPB) was performed. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy, and the secondary outcomes were technical success, sampling adequacy, and procedure-related adverse events.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Biliary cytology with ROSE was technically successful in all patients (58/58), with a sampling adequacy of 96.6% (56/58). The technical success and sampling adequacy of TPB were 94.8% (55/58) and 91.4% (53/58), respectively. Brush cytology with ROSE and TPB yielded sensitivity rates of 91.8% and 85.7%, specificity rates of 88.9% for both, and accuracy rates of 88.9% for both. The receiver operating characteristic curve comparing the diagnostic accuracies of brush cytology with ROSE and TPB combined versus TPB alone showed a significantly higher value for the combined approach (0.93) than TPB alone (0.87) (<i>p</i> = 0.010).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Biliary brush cytology using a novel brush device with ROSE is effective and can be used complementarily to TPB in patients with suspected MBS.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"750-756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgh.16865\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgh.16865","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在内镜逆行胆管造影中,刷细胞学是一种广泛应用的诊断方法,与导管内活检相结合,但其诊断率仍然有限。本研究评价了一种新开发的带有快速现场细胞学评估(ROSE)的刷式胆道细胞学检查装置对恶性胆道狭窄(MBSs)的检测效果。方法:共纳入58例经导管内超声鉴别的疑似内禀MBS患者。在通过最多两次刷牙通过ROSE实现组织采样后,进行了经乳头钳活检(TPB)。主要结局是诊断的准确性,次要结局是技术上的成功、抽样充分性和手术相关的不良事件。结果:所有患者的胆道细胞学检查技术上都是成功的(58/58),采样充分性为96.6%(56/58)。TPB的技术成功率为94.8%(55/58),抽样充分性为91.4%(53/58)。刷细胞学检测ROSE和TPB的敏感性分别为91.8%和85.7%,特异性均为88.9%,准确率均为88.9%。比较刷细胞学与ROSE和TPB联合与TPB单独诊断准确率的受试者工作特征曲线显示,联合方法诊断准确率(0.93)显著高于TPB单独诊断准确率(0.87)(p = 0.010)。结论:一种新型的带有ROSE刷刷装置的胆道刷刷细胞学检查是有效的,可与TPB辅助应用于疑似MBS患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Biliary Brush Cytology With Rapid On-Site Cytological Evaluation for the Detection of Malignant Biliary Strictures

Background and Aims

Brush cytology is a widely used diagnostic method in conjunction with intraductal biopsies during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, but its diagnostic yield remains a limitation. This study evaluated the efficacy of biliary cytology using a newly developed brush device with rapid on-site cytological evaluation (ROSE) for detecting malignant biliary strictures (MBSs).

Methods

In total, 58 patients with suspected intrinsic MBS identified by intraductal ultrasound were enrolled. After achieving tissue sampling with ROSE through a maximum of two brushing passes, a transpapillary forceps biopsy (TPB) was performed. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy, and the secondary outcomes were technical success, sampling adequacy, and procedure-related adverse events.

Results

Biliary cytology with ROSE was technically successful in all patients (58/58), with a sampling adequacy of 96.6% (56/58). The technical success and sampling adequacy of TPB were 94.8% (55/58) and 91.4% (53/58), respectively. Brush cytology with ROSE and TPB yielded sensitivity rates of 91.8% and 85.7%, specificity rates of 88.9% for both, and accuracy rates of 88.9% for both. The receiver operating characteristic curve comparing the diagnostic accuracies of brush cytology with ROSE and TPB combined versus TPB alone showed a significantly higher value for the combined approach (0.93) than TPB alone (0.87) (p = 0.010).

Conclusion

Biliary brush cytology using a novel brush device with ROSE is effective and can be used complementarily to TPB in patients with suspected MBS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Double EUS-Bypass Versus Conventional Endoscopic Strategies for Concurrent Malignant Gastric Outlet and Biliary Obstruction. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Pathway Is a Potential Biological Mechanism in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Induced Psoriasis. Comment on "Mediterranean Diet Adherence Is Associated With Reduced Liver Fibrosis Risk in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease". Outcomes of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab in Real-World Clinical Practice Who Met or Did Not Meet the Inclusion Criteria for the Phase 3 HIMALAYA Trial. Re-Evaluating Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis in Fontan-Associated Liver Disease: Are We Treating the Right Patients at the Right Time?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1