数字化健康准备——运营管理中医疗保健领导者的见解:一项横断面调查。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-12129-y
Ilze Steenkamp, Laura Maria Peltonen, Jennifer Chipps
{"title":"数字化健康准备——运营管理中医疗保健领导者的见解:一项横断面调查。","authors":"Ilze Steenkamp, Laura Maria Peltonen, Jennifer Chipps","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-12129-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Developing countries' public health systems struggle with digital health implementation, and reports of low digital health readiness exist within the workforce. This study investigates the perceived digital health readiness of healthcare leaders in operational management to implement digital health tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey using the E-Ready 2.0 scale was used to measure digital health readiness (n = 329) in 11 hospitals in the Western Cape, South Africa (September 2023 - March 2024). Descriptive statistics summarised respondent characteristics and the E-Ready 2.0 subscales: conditions for change at the workplace and among individuals, support and engagement from management, colleagues' readiness, consequences for the status quo and workplace attitudes. Statements scoring 60% or more were considered to have higher readiness. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to examine associations between demographic variables and subscale statements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 143 healthcare leaders responded (56.1% response rate) (n = 114 nurses [79.7%], n = 29 medical doctors [20.3%]). The average age was 46.4 ± 10.0 years. Overall, higher levels of readiness (above 70%) were observed with statements related to workplace attitudes, whereas conditions for change at the workplace and among individuals showed lower readiness (below 50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite significant investment in digital health tools, there remains limited digital health readiness among those responsible for leading these implementations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"240"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital health readiness - insights from healthcare leaders in operational management: a cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Ilze Steenkamp, Laura Maria Peltonen, Jennifer Chipps\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-024-12129-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Developing countries' public health systems struggle with digital health implementation, and reports of low digital health readiness exist within the workforce. This study investigates the perceived digital health readiness of healthcare leaders in operational management to implement digital health tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey using the E-Ready 2.0 scale was used to measure digital health readiness (n = 329) in 11 hospitals in the Western Cape, South Africa (September 2023 - March 2024). Descriptive statistics summarised respondent characteristics and the E-Ready 2.0 subscales: conditions for change at the workplace and among individuals, support and engagement from management, colleagues' readiness, consequences for the status quo and workplace attitudes. Statements scoring 60% or more were considered to have higher readiness. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to examine associations between demographic variables and subscale statements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 143 healthcare leaders responded (56.1% response rate) (n = 114 nurses [79.7%], n = 29 medical doctors [20.3%]). The average age was 46.4 ± 10.0 years. Overall, higher levels of readiness (above 70%) were observed with statements related to workplace attitudes, whereas conditions for change at the workplace and among individuals showed lower readiness (below 50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite significant investment in digital health tools, there remains limited digital health readiness among those responsible for leading these implementations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823159/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-12129-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-12129-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:发展中国家的公共卫生系统在数字卫生实施方面存在困难,并且有报告称,劳动力中存在数字卫生准备程度较低的情况。本研究调查了医疗保健领导者在运营管理中实施数字健康工具的感知数字健康准备情况。方法:采用E-Ready 2.0量表进行横断面调查,测量南非西开普省11家医院(2023年9月至2024年3月)的数字健康准备情况(n = 329)。描述性统计总结了受访者的特征和E-Ready 2.0子量表:工作场所和个人之间的变化条件、管理层的支持和参与、同事的准备程度、对现状的影响以及工作场所的态度。得分在60%以上的陈述被认为准备程度更高。卡方检验和曼-惠特尼U检验用于检验人口统计变量与子量表陈述之间的关联。结果:共有143名卫生保健负责人回复,答复率为56.1%,其中护士114名(79.7%),医生29名(20.3%)。平均年龄46.4±10.0岁。总体而言,与工作场所态度相关的陈述的准备程度较高(高于70%),而工作场所和个人之间的变化条件的准备程度较低(低于50%)。结论:尽管对数字健康工具进行了大量投资,但负责领导实施这些工具的人员对数字健康的准备程度仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital health readiness - insights from healthcare leaders in operational management: a cross-sectional survey.

Background: Developing countries' public health systems struggle with digital health implementation, and reports of low digital health readiness exist within the workforce. This study investigates the perceived digital health readiness of healthcare leaders in operational management to implement digital health tools.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey using the E-Ready 2.0 scale was used to measure digital health readiness (n = 329) in 11 hospitals in the Western Cape, South Africa (September 2023 - March 2024). Descriptive statistics summarised respondent characteristics and the E-Ready 2.0 subscales: conditions for change at the workplace and among individuals, support and engagement from management, colleagues' readiness, consequences for the status quo and workplace attitudes. Statements scoring 60% or more were considered to have higher readiness. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to examine associations between demographic variables and subscale statements.

Results: A total of 143 healthcare leaders responded (56.1% response rate) (n = 114 nurses [79.7%], n = 29 medical doctors [20.3%]). The average age was 46.4 ± 10.0 years. Overall, higher levels of readiness (above 70%) were observed with statements related to workplace attitudes, whereas conditions for change at the workplace and among individuals showed lower readiness (below 50%).

Conclusion: Despite significant investment in digital health tools, there remains limited digital health readiness among those responsible for leading these implementations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Here today, gone tomorrow? Managerial perceptions of opportunities and challenges with temporary employment in eldercare. Having and eating the cake? The centralisation paradox in decentralised healthcare governance: a scoping review. Organizational readiness for implementation of food and nutrition surveillance in Brazilian primary health care: a cross-sectional study. Access to outpatient psychotherapy and utilisation of services after structural reform in Germany: analysis of administrative claims data for people with depression. Health facility capacities for providing adolescent sexual and reproductive health services in Southwestern Uganda.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1