乌干达农村“从医院到家庭”出院和后续方案的可行性、可接受性和初步有效性:一项混合方法干预研究。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015945
Beatrice Niyonshaba, Daniel Kabugo, Cornety Nakiganda, Christine Otai, Margret Seela, Joyce Nankabala, James Nyonyintono, Josephine Nakakande, Tadeo Kigozi, Madeline Vaughan, Heidi Nakamura, Mohan Paudel, Kimber Haddix-McKay, Benjamin J S Al-Haddad, Cally J Tann, Paul Mubiri, Peter Waiswa, Brooke Magnusson
{"title":"乌干达农村“从医院到家庭”出院和后续方案的可行性、可接受性和初步有效性:一项混合方法干预研究。","authors":"Beatrice Niyonshaba, Daniel Kabugo, Cornety Nakiganda, Christine Otai, Margret Seela, Joyce Nankabala, James Nyonyintono, Josephine Nakakande, Tadeo Kigozi, Madeline Vaughan, Heidi Nakamura, Mohan Paudel, Kimber Haddix-McKay, Benjamin J S Al-Haddad, Cally J Tann, Paul Mubiri, Peter Waiswa, Brooke Magnusson","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Over 60% of premature infants are born in Africa or South Asia. Infants born early, small or who become sick after birth have a higher risk of death, poor growth and developmental impairments. Innovative interventions tailored for low- and middle-income countries are essential to help these newborns survive and develop optimally. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of Hospital to Home (H2H), a discharge and follow-up programme for small and sick newborns in rural Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared two cohorts of high-risk hospitalised neonates in Uganda: a historical-comparison cohort receiving standard facility-based care and an intervention cohort that received the H2H programme, a hospital and community spanning package of interventions designed to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes. We compared 6-month corrected neurodevelopmental, growth, nutritional and vaccination outcomes between the cohorts complemented by qualitative interviews of caregivers, community health workers and health facility staff.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 191 participants: 91 historical-comparison cohort (born between July and September 2018), and 100 intervention cohort (born July 2019 to February 2020). No statistically significant difference was seen in neurodevelopmental outcomes (adjusted OR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.46). Improved vaccination completion (88.5% intervention vs 76.9% comparison, p=0.041), and exclusive breastfeeding rates (42% vs 6.6%, p<0.001) were seen. Caregivers and healthcare workers reported the intervention to be acceptable and feasible in this rural Ugandan setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The H2H programme was feasible and acceptable to caregivers and healthcare providers. Improved vaccination and exclusive breastfeeding rates were seen in the intervention group when compared with a historical comparison cohort in this rural Ugandan setting. Further investigation on the short and long-term effectiveness of the H2H programme in a government health services setting is warranted.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ISRCTN51636372.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of the Hospital to Home discharge and follow-up programme in rural Uganda: a mixed-methods intervention study.\",\"authors\":\"Beatrice Niyonshaba, Daniel Kabugo, Cornety Nakiganda, Christine Otai, Margret Seela, Joyce Nankabala, James Nyonyintono, Josephine Nakakande, Tadeo Kigozi, Madeline Vaughan, Heidi Nakamura, Mohan Paudel, Kimber Haddix-McKay, Benjamin J S Al-Haddad, Cally J Tann, Paul Mubiri, Peter Waiswa, Brooke Magnusson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Over 60% of premature infants are born in Africa or South Asia. Infants born early, small or who become sick after birth have a higher risk of death, poor growth and developmental impairments. Innovative interventions tailored for low- and middle-income countries are essential to help these newborns survive and develop optimally. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of Hospital to Home (H2H), a discharge and follow-up programme for small and sick newborns in rural Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared two cohorts of high-risk hospitalised neonates in Uganda: a historical-comparison cohort receiving standard facility-based care and an intervention cohort that received the H2H programme, a hospital and community spanning package of interventions designed to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes. We compared 6-month corrected neurodevelopmental, growth, nutritional and vaccination outcomes between the cohorts complemented by qualitative interviews of caregivers, community health workers and health facility staff.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 191 participants: 91 historical-comparison cohort (born between July and September 2018), and 100 intervention cohort (born July 2019 to February 2020). No statistically significant difference was seen in neurodevelopmental outcomes (adjusted OR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.46). Improved vaccination completion (88.5% intervention vs 76.9% comparison, p=0.041), and exclusive breastfeeding rates (42% vs 6.6%, p<0.001) were seen. Caregivers and healthcare workers reported the intervention to be acceptable and feasible in this rural Ugandan setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The H2H programme was feasible and acceptable to caregivers and healthcare providers. Improved vaccination and exclusive breastfeeding rates were seen in the intervention group when compared with a historical comparison cohort in this rural Ugandan setting. Further investigation on the short and long-term effectiveness of the H2H programme in a government health services setting is warranted.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ISRCTN51636372.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822387/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015945\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

60%以上的早产儿出生在非洲或南亚。出生早、小或出生后生病的婴儿死亡、生长不良和发育障碍的风险较高。为低收入和中等收入国家量身定制的创新干预措施对于帮助这些新生儿以最佳方式生存和发展至关重要。这项研究评估了从医院到家庭(H2H)的可行性、可接受性和初步有效性,这是一项针对乌干达农村地区幼小和患病新生儿的出院和随访方案。方法:我们比较了乌干达高危住院新生儿的两个队列:接受标准设施护理的历史比较队列和接受H2H计划的干预队列,H2H计划是一项旨在改善神经发育结果的医院和社区一揽子干预措施。通过对护理人员、社区卫生工作者和卫生机构工作人员的定性访谈,我们比较了6个月校正后的神经发育、生长、营养和疫苗接种结果。结果:我们招募了191名参与者:91名历史比较队列(2018年7月至9月出生)和100名干预队列(2019年7月至2020年2月出生)。两组在神经发育结局方面无统计学差异(调整OR 0.68;95% CI: 0.32 ~ 1.46)。提高了疫苗接种完成率(干预率为88.5%,对照组为76.9%,p=0.041)和纯母乳喂养率(干预率为42%,对照组为6.6%,p=0.041)。结论:H2H方案对护理人员和卫生保健提供者来说是可行和可接受的。与乌干达农村地区的历史比较队列相比,干预组的疫苗接种率和纯母乳喂养率有所提高。有必要进一步调查在政府卫生服务机构中实施的H2H方案的短期和长期效果。试验注册号:ISRCTN51636372。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of the Hospital to Home discharge and follow-up programme in rural Uganda: a mixed-methods intervention study.

Introduction: Over 60% of premature infants are born in Africa or South Asia. Infants born early, small or who become sick after birth have a higher risk of death, poor growth and developmental impairments. Innovative interventions tailored for low- and middle-income countries are essential to help these newborns survive and develop optimally. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of Hospital to Home (H2H), a discharge and follow-up programme for small and sick newborns in rural Uganda.

Methods: We compared two cohorts of high-risk hospitalised neonates in Uganda: a historical-comparison cohort receiving standard facility-based care and an intervention cohort that received the H2H programme, a hospital and community spanning package of interventions designed to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes. We compared 6-month corrected neurodevelopmental, growth, nutritional and vaccination outcomes between the cohorts complemented by qualitative interviews of caregivers, community health workers and health facility staff.

Results: We recruited 191 participants: 91 historical-comparison cohort (born between July and September 2018), and 100 intervention cohort (born July 2019 to February 2020). No statistically significant difference was seen in neurodevelopmental outcomes (adjusted OR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.46). Improved vaccination completion (88.5% intervention vs 76.9% comparison, p=0.041), and exclusive breastfeeding rates (42% vs 6.6%, p<0.001) were seen. Caregivers and healthcare workers reported the intervention to be acceptable and feasible in this rural Ugandan setting.

Conclusion: The H2H programme was feasible and acceptable to caregivers and healthcare providers. Improved vaccination and exclusive breastfeeding rates were seen in the intervention group when compared with a historical comparison cohort in this rural Ugandan setting. Further investigation on the short and long-term effectiveness of the H2H programme in a government health services setting is warranted.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN51636372.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Association of surgery and economic development in low- and middle-income countries: evidence from a dynamic panel data analysis. The introduction of group antenatal care in northern Nigeria: an implementation research study analysing changes in service use. The impact of investments in health systems: a rapid review of computational models. Equitable imagery in global health: a qualitative study examining how to create agency, share power and build partnership. The global SEARCH network: providing a framework for critical COVID-19 healthcare worker cohort studies transitioning from the pandemic to the interpandemic period.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1