服务于美国德克萨斯州农村和/或医疗服务不足地区的两种类型的医疗保健中心之间,提供者对卷烟和非卷烟烟草使用的信念和5a交付的差异

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.3390/healthcare13030338
Ammar D Siddiqi, Brian J Carter, Maggie Britton, Tzuan A Chen, Isabel Martinez Leal, Asfand B Moosa, Teresa Williams, Kathleen Casey, Hector Sanchez, Lorraine R Reitzel
{"title":"服务于美国德克萨斯州农村和/或医疗服务不足地区的两种类型的医疗保健中心之间,提供者对卷烟和非卷烟烟草使用的信念和5a交付的差异","authors":"Ammar D Siddiqi, Brian J Carter, Maggie Britton, Tzuan A Chen, Isabel Martinez Leal, Asfand B Moosa, Teresa Williams, Kathleen Casey, Hector Sanchez, Lorraine R Reitzel","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13030338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Rural populations in the US bear a disproportionate burden of cancer mortality, which may be partly due to their elevated tobacco use and the limited receipt of tobacco use interventions in rural healthcare settings. Here, we examine providers' use of the 5As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange), a brief tobacco cessation intervention, with their patients to assess intervention gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Provider practices in substance use treatment centers (SUTCs) and medical healthcare centers (MHCs), each serving rural and/or medically underserved areas (MUAs) of Texas, were compared. In total, 347 providers from 10 SUTCs (<i>n</i> = 174) and 9 MHCs (<i>n</i> = 173) responded to an anonymized survey about their cigarette and non-cigarette screening and intervention delivery, along with their perceived importance and workforce's preparedness to help patients stop using tobacco. Linear mixed and generalized linear mixed models were used to assess differences between practices at SUTCs and MHCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More MHC than SUTC providers reported that cigarette and non-cigarette tobacco use cessation intervention were (respectively) important parts of their job (<i>p</i> = 0.0009; <i>p</i> = 0.0023) and that their workforce was prepared to help their patients quit tobacco (<i>p</i> = 0.0275), although less than half of all respondents endorsed preparedness. Relative to those at SUTCs, MHC providers reported higher rates of asking (SUTCs = 59.57% and MHCs = 77.21%; <i>p</i> = 0.0182) and advising (SUTCs = 45.34% and MHCs = 72.35%; <i>p</i> = 0.0017) their patients to quit cigarette smoking and advising them to quit non-cigarette tobacco products (SUTCs = 43.94% and MHCs = 71.76%; <i>p</i> = 0.0016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, providers in both settings may benefit from greater preparation to deliver tobacco cessation care; needs were more prevalent within SUTCs than MHCs. Our findings can inform strategic planning to improve centers' capacity to comprehensively address their patients' tobacco use in rural/MUAs of Texas, US.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Provider Beliefs and Delivery of the 5As for Cigarette and Non-Cigarette Tobacco Use Between Two Types of Healthcare Centers Serving Rural and/or Medically Underserved Areas of Texas, US.\",\"authors\":\"Ammar D Siddiqi, Brian J Carter, Maggie Britton, Tzuan A Chen, Isabel Martinez Leal, Asfand B Moosa, Teresa Williams, Kathleen Casey, Hector Sanchez, Lorraine R Reitzel\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare13030338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Rural populations in the US bear a disproportionate burden of cancer mortality, which may be partly due to their elevated tobacco use and the limited receipt of tobacco use interventions in rural healthcare settings. Here, we examine providers' use of the 5As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange), a brief tobacco cessation intervention, with their patients to assess intervention gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Provider practices in substance use treatment centers (SUTCs) and medical healthcare centers (MHCs), each serving rural and/or medically underserved areas (MUAs) of Texas, were compared. In total, 347 providers from 10 SUTCs (<i>n</i> = 174) and 9 MHCs (<i>n</i> = 173) responded to an anonymized survey about their cigarette and non-cigarette screening and intervention delivery, along with their perceived importance and workforce's preparedness to help patients stop using tobacco. Linear mixed and generalized linear mixed models were used to assess differences between practices at SUTCs and MHCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More MHC than SUTC providers reported that cigarette and non-cigarette tobacco use cessation intervention were (respectively) important parts of their job (<i>p</i> = 0.0009; <i>p</i> = 0.0023) and that their workforce was prepared to help their patients quit tobacco (<i>p</i> = 0.0275), although less than half of all respondents endorsed preparedness. Relative to those at SUTCs, MHC providers reported higher rates of asking (SUTCs = 59.57% and MHCs = 77.21%; <i>p</i> = 0.0182) and advising (SUTCs = 45.34% and MHCs = 72.35%; <i>p</i> = 0.0017) their patients to quit cigarette smoking and advising them to quit non-cigarette tobacco products (SUTCs = 43.94% and MHCs = 71.76%; <i>p</i> = 0.0016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, providers in both settings may benefit from greater preparation to deliver tobacco cessation care; needs were more prevalent within SUTCs than MHCs. Our findings can inform strategic planning to improve centers' capacity to comprehensively address their patients' tobacco use in rural/MUAs of Texas, US.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817286/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13030338\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13030338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:美国农村人口承担着不成比例的癌症死亡率负担,其部分原因可能是他们的烟草使用增加以及农村卫生保健机构对烟草使用干预措施的接受有限。在这里,我们检查提供者使用5a(询问,建议,评估,协助和安排),一个简短的戒烟干预,与他们的病人评估干预差距。方法:比较物质使用治疗中心(sutc)和医疗保健中心(MHCs)的提供者实践,每个服务于德克萨斯州农村和/或医疗服务不足地区(MUAs)。共有来自10个sutc (n = 174)和9个MHCs (n = 173)的347名提供者回应了一项匿名调查,内容涉及他们的卷烟和非卷烟筛查和干预措施,以及他们认为的重要性和工作人员帮助患者戒烟的准备情况。使用线性混合和广义线性混合模型来评估sutc和MHCs实践之间的差异。结果:与SUTC提供者相比,更多的MHC提供者报告香烟和非香烟戒烟干预(分别)是他们工作的重要组成部分(p = 0.0009;P = 0.0023),他们的工作人员准备帮助他们的病人戒烟(P = 0.0275),尽管不到一半的受访者赞同准备。与sutc相比,MHC提供者报告的询问率更高(sutc = 59.57%, MHC = 77.21%;p = 0.0182)和建议(SUTCs = 45.34%, MHCs = 72.35%;p = 0.0017)建议患者戒烟并戒烟非卷烟烟草制品(sutc = 43.94%, MHCs = 71.76%;P = 0.0016)。结论:总体而言,两种情况下的提供者都可以从提供戒烟护理的更充分准备中受益;需求在SUTCs中比MHCs更普遍。我们的研究结果可以为战略规划提供信息,以提高中心全面解决美国德克萨斯州农村/ mua患者烟草使用问题的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in Provider Beliefs and Delivery of the 5As for Cigarette and Non-Cigarette Tobacco Use Between Two Types of Healthcare Centers Serving Rural and/or Medically Underserved Areas of Texas, US.

Background/objectives: Rural populations in the US bear a disproportionate burden of cancer mortality, which may be partly due to their elevated tobacco use and the limited receipt of tobacco use interventions in rural healthcare settings. Here, we examine providers' use of the 5As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange), a brief tobacco cessation intervention, with their patients to assess intervention gaps.

Methods: Provider practices in substance use treatment centers (SUTCs) and medical healthcare centers (MHCs), each serving rural and/or medically underserved areas (MUAs) of Texas, were compared. In total, 347 providers from 10 SUTCs (n = 174) and 9 MHCs (n = 173) responded to an anonymized survey about their cigarette and non-cigarette screening and intervention delivery, along with their perceived importance and workforce's preparedness to help patients stop using tobacco. Linear mixed and generalized linear mixed models were used to assess differences between practices at SUTCs and MHCs.

Results: More MHC than SUTC providers reported that cigarette and non-cigarette tobacco use cessation intervention were (respectively) important parts of their job (p = 0.0009; p = 0.0023) and that their workforce was prepared to help their patients quit tobacco (p = 0.0275), although less than half of all respondents endorsed preparedness. Relative to those at SUTCs, MHC providers reported higher rates of asking (SUTCs = 59.57% and MHCs = 77.21%; p = 0.0182) and advising (SUTCs = 45.34% and MHCs = 72.35%; p = 0.0017) their patients to quit cigarette smoking and advising them to quit non-cigarette tobacco products (SUTCs = 43.94% and MHCs = 71.76%; p = 0.0016).

Conclusions: Overall, providers in both settings may benefit from greater preparation to deliver tobacco cessation care; needs were more prevalent within SUTCs than MHCs. Our findings can inform strategic planning to improve centers' capacity to comprehensively address their patients' tobacco use in rural/MUAs of Texas, US.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Students' Perceptions and Usage of Artificial Intelligence in Supporting Mental Health: A Preliminary Study in Higher Education in Qatar. Exploring the Psychosocial Impact on Families Caring for Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Qualitative Study in Saudi Arabia. Hybrid Tele-Rehabilitation in the Management of Pediatric Chronic Suppurative Lung Diseases: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Changes in Disease Severity and Outcomes Among Electively Admitted Cirrhosis Patients During the COVID-19 Era. Compassionate Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Discontinuation: A Narrative Review and Practical Process Model for Reliable End-of-Life Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1