难以触及的人群在哪里?肯尼亚维多利亚湖地区获得蚊帐和疟疾疫苗的横断面研究的空间分析。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Malaria Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1186/s12936-025-05280-2
Yura K Ko, Wataru Kagaya, Daisuke Yoneoka, James Kongere, Victor Opiyo, Jared Oginga, Protus Omondi, Kelvin B Musyoka, Chim W Chan, Bernard N Kanoi, Jesse Gitaka, Akira Kaneko
{"title":"难以触及的人群在哪里?肯尼亚维多利亚湖地区获得蚊帐和疟疾疫苗的横断面研究的空间分析。","authors":"Yura K Ko, Wataru Kagaya, Daisuke Yoneoka, James Kongere, Victor Opiyo, Jared Oginga, Protus Omondi, Kelvin B Musyoka, Chim W Chan, Bernard N Kanoi, Jesse Gitaka, Akira Kaneko","doi":"10.1186/s12936-025-05280-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) and vaccines are effective malaria control tools. However, inadequate uptake has been reported in countries where both interventions are available. To maximize the impact these tools provide, it is crucial to identify populations that are not being reached and the barriers to uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study conducted in April 2024 in Kanyamwa Kologi Ward in Homa Bay County, Kenya, 4,662 households in 58 randomely selected villages were visited and interviewed. The proportions of households that (1) received at least one new LLIN within the previous five months (net distribution), (2) reported all children used LLIN (net usage), (3) reported at least one child had received one dose of the RTS,S vaccine (vaccine uptake), and (4) reported all children had received four doses of the vaccine (vaccine completion) were examined. Bayesian spatial autoregression analyses were used to estimate adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and its credible intervals (CrI) to identify the association between the household-level characteristics and the four outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall uptake proportions were 89.9% for net distribution, 84.4% for net usage, 88.2% for vaccine uptake, and 53.7% for vaccine completion. All four outcomes showed geographical heterogeneity with significant (p < 0.05) Moran's I. Households headed by adults of > 40 years had higher odds of having received a new LLIN (aOR = 2.02, 95% CrI 1.02-5.42), having one child who had received one vaccine dose (aOR = 1.83, 0.69-4.66), and having all children fully vaccinated (aOR = 2.36, 1.09-5.46), but lower odds of net usage by all children (aOR = 0.62, 0.40-0.96). Households with five or more children had higher odds of having received a new LLIN (aOR = 5.36, 2.24-27.0) but lower odds of net usage by all children (aOR = 0.24, 0.14-0.38) and having all children fully vaccinated (aOR = 0.20, 0.04-0.61). Distance to the nearest health centre was negatively associated with all outcomes. Household wealth was positively associated with all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Uptake of LLIN and malaria vaccine in Homa Bay County, Kenya varied by geography and household characteristics. These findings suggest that different sets of actions should be considered to improve the coverage and compliance of these interventions in different areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":18317,"journal":{"name":"Malaria Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where is the hard-to-reach population? Spatial analysis from a cross-sectional study on the access to bed net and malaria vaccine in the Lake Victoria Region, Kenya.\",\"authors\":\"Yura K Ko, Wataru Kagaya, Daisuke Yoneoka, James Kongere, Victor Opiyo, Jared Oginga, Protus Omondi, Kelvin B Musyoka, Chim W Chan, Bernard N Kanoi, Jesse Gitaka, Akira Kaneko\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12936-025-05280-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) and vaccines are effective malaria control tools. However, inadequate uptake has been reported in countries where both interventions are available. To maximize the impact these tools provide, it is crucial to identify populations that are not being reached and the barriers to uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study conducted in April 2024 in Kanyamwa Kologi Ward in Homa Bay County, Kenya, 4,662 households in 58 randomely selected villages were visited and interviewed. The proportions of households that (1) received at least one new LLIN within the previous five months (net distribution), (2) reported all children used LLIN (net usage), (3) reported at least one child had received one dose of the RTS,S vaccine (vaccine uptake), and (4) reported all children had received four doses of the vaccine (vaccine completion) were examined. Bayesian spatial autoregression analyses were used to estimate adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and its credible intervals (CrI) to identify the association between the household-level characteristics and the four outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall uptake proportions were 89.9% for net distribution, 84.4% for net usage, 88.2% for vaccine uptake, and 53.7% for vaccine completion. All four outcomes showed geographical heterogeneity with significant (p < 0.05) Moran's I. Households headed by adults of > 40 years had higher odds of having received a new LLIN (aOR = 2.02, 95% CrI 1.02-5.42), having one child who had received one vaccine dose (aOR = 1.83, 0.69-4.66), and having all children fully vaccinated (aOR = 2.36, 1.09-5.46), but lower odds of net usage by all children (aOR = 0.62, 0.40-0.96). Households with five or more children had higher odds of having received a new LLIN (aOR = 5.36, 2.24-27.0) but lower odds of net usage by all children (aOR = 0.24, 0.14-0.38) and having all children fully vaccinated (aOR = 0.20, 0.04-0.61). Distance to the nearest health centre was negatively associated with all outcomes. Household wealth was positively associated with all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Uptake of LLIN and malaria vaccine in Homa Bay County, Kenya varied by geography and household characteristics. These findings suggest that different sets of actions should be considered to improve the coverage and compliance of these interventions in different areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaria Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823133/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaria Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05280-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaria Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05280-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:长效杀虫蚊帐(LLIN)和疫苗是有效的疟疾控制工具。然而,据报告,在可获得这两种干预措施的国家,吸收不足。为了最大限度地发挥这些工具的影响,至关重要的是要确定尚未覆盖到的人群以及采用这些工具的障碍。方法:于2024年4月在肯尼亚霍马贝县Kanyamwa Kologi区进行了一项横断面研究,随机选择58个村庄的4662户进行了访问和访谈。对以下家庭的比例进行了检查:(1)在过去五个月内至少接受了一种新的LLIN(净分配),(2)报告所有儿童都使用了LLIN(净使用),(3)报告至少有一名儿童接受了一剂RTS,S疫苗(疫苗摄取),以及(4)报告所有儿童接受了四剂疫苗(疫苗完成)。采用贝叶斯空间自回归分析估计调整优势比(aOR)及其可信区间(CrI),以确定家庭水平特征与四种结果之间的关联。结果:净分配比例为89.9%,净使用比例为84.4%,疫苗接种率为88.2%,疫苗完成率为53.7%。所有四个结果均显示出显著的地理异质性(p = 40岁,接受新LLIN的几率较高(aOR = 2.02, 95% CrI 1.02-5.42),一名儿童接受一剂疫苗的几率较高(aOR = 1.83, 0.69-4.66),所有儿童完全接种疫苗的几率较高(aOR = 2.36, 1.09-5.46),但所有儿童净使用的几率较低(aOR = 0.62, 0.40-0.96)。有5个或5个以上子女的家庭获得新的LLIN的几率较高(aOR = 5.36, 2.24-27.0),但所有儿童使用净疫苗的几率较低(aOR = 0.24, 0.14-0.38),所有儿童完全接种疫苗的几率较低(aOR = 0.20, 0.04-0.61)。到最近的保健中心的距离与所有结果呈负相关。家庭财富与所有结果呈正相关。结论:肯尼亚Homa Bay县的LLIN和疟疾疫苗的摄取因地理和家庭特征而异。这些发现表明,应考虑采取不同的行动,以提高这些干预措施在不同地区的覆盖面和依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Where is the hard-to-reach population? Spatial analysis from a cross-sectional study on the access to bed net and malaria vaccine in the Lake Victoria Region, Kenya.

Background: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) and vaccines are effective malaria control tools. However, inadequate uptake has been reported in countries where both interventions are available. To maximize the impact these tools provide, it is crucial to identify populations that are not being reached and the barriers to uptake.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study conducted in April 2024 in Kanyamwa Kologi Ward in Homa Bay County, Kenya, 4,662 households in 58 randomely selected villages were visited and interviewed. The proportions of households that (1) received at least one new LLIN within the previous five months (net distribution), (2) reported all children used LLIN (net usage), (3) reported at least one child had received one dose of the RTS,S vaccine (vaccine uptake), and (4) reported all children had received four doses of the vaccine (vaccine completion) were examined. Bayesian spatial autoregression analyses were used to estimate adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and its credible intervals (CrI) to identify the association between the household-level characteristics and the four outcomes.

Results: The overall uptake proportions were 89.9% for net distribution, 84.4% for net usage, 88.2% for vaccine uptake, and 53.7% for vaccine completion. All four outcomes showed geographical heterogeneity with significant (p < 0.05) Moran's I. Households headed by adults of > 40 years had higher odds of having received a new LLIN (aOR = 2.02, 95% CrI 1.02-5.42), having one child who had received one vaccine dose (aOR = 1.83, 0.69-4.66), and having all children fully vaccinated (aOR = 2.36, 1.09-5.46), but lower odds of net usage by all children (aOR = 0.62, 0.40-0.96). Households with five or more children had higher odds of having received a new LLIN (aOR = 5.36, 2.24-27.0) but lower odds of net usage by all children (aOR = 0.24, 0.14-0.38) and having all children fully vaccinated (aOR = 0.20, 0.04-0.61). Distance to the nearest health centre was negatively associated with all outcomes. Household wealth was positively associated with all outcomes.

Conclusion: Uptake of LLIN and malaria vaccine in Homa Bay County, Kenya varied by geography and household characteristics. These findings suggest that different sets of actions should be considered to improve the coverage and compliance of these interventions in different areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Malaria Journal
Malaria Journal 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
23.30%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Malaria Journal is aimed at the scientific community interested in malaria in its broadest sense. It is the only journal that publishes exclusively articles on malaria and, as such, it aims to bring together knowledge from the different specialities involved in this very broad discipline, from the bench to the bedside and to the field.
期刊最新文献
Healthcare workers' knowledge and acceptance of the malaria vaccine in the Nanoro Health District of Burkina Faso: a cross-sectional study. Prevalence of malaria and its major parasite species in Bangladesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Where did the nets go? Tracing long-lasting insecticidal net migration on Bioko Island. Adherence to 14-day primaquine treatment for radical cure of Plasmodium vivax and mixed malaria patients treated at health centers in Yilmana Densa district, Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. Genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum helical interspersed subtelomeric (phistb) gene in Tanzania and neighboring countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1