护理实践博士项目PowerPoint指南的开发。

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1891/JDNP-2023-0062
Zane Robinson Wolf, Jeannine Uribe
{"title":"护理实践博士项目PowerPoint指南的开发。","authors":"Zane Robinson Wolf, Jeannine Uribe","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-2023-0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Although Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students have used rubrics to guide assignments, few have created PowerPoint slide decks for professional presentations. Students might benefit from a rubric that standardizes PowerPoint presentations on final DNP projects. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of the study is to conduct a quality improvement project to evaluate a literature-based rubric guiding students' PowerPoint presentations and the grading of final projects. <b>Methods:</b> Two faculty independently scored PowerPoint slides structuring final DNP project presentations for the literature-based rubric. They revised the rubric based on ratings and comments. Nine content experts rated the relevance of the revised rubric's criteria. <b>Results:</b> Three criteria differed at a statistically different level on the literature-based rubric's ratings. Interrater reliability was low. The rubric criteria were revised. Nine experts' ratings showed criteria on the revised rubric were relevant; their comments stimulated revisions. The Survey Content Validity Average was 0.88, suggesting the relevance of criteria. <b>Conclusions:</b> The rubric requires additional revisions. Posting the revised rubric in the student resource course of the learning management system might assist students to construct PowerPoint presentations in DNP courses and for professional presentations. <b>Implications for Nursing:</b> The rubric was shared with DNP Project Teams. Faculty will continue to evaluate the quality of the students' presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a PowerPoint Rubric for Doctor of Nursing Practice Projects.\",\"authors\":\"Zane Robinson Wolf, Jeannine Uribe\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JDNP-2023-0062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Although Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students have used rubrics to guide assignments, few have created PowerPoint slide decks for professional presentations. Students might benefit from a rubric that standardizes PowerPoint presentations on final DNP projects. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of the study is to conduct a quality improvement project to evaluate a literature-based rubric guiding students' PowerPoint presentations and the grading of final projects. <b>Methods:</b> Two faculty independently scored PowerPoint slides structuring final DNP project presentations for the literature-based rubric. They revised the rubric based on ratings and comments. Nine content experts rated the relevance of the revised rubric's criteria. <b>Results:</b> Three criteria differed at a statistically different level on the literature-based rubric's ratings. Interrater reliability was low. The rubric criteria were revised. Nine experts' ratings showed criteria on the revised rubric were relevant; their comments stimulated revisions. The Survey Content Validity Average was 0.88, suggesting the relevance of criteria. <b>Conclusions:</b> The rubric requires additional revisions. Posting the revised rubric in the student resource course of the learning management system might assist students to construct PowerPoint presentations in DNP courses and for professional presentations. <b>Implications for Nursing:</b> The rubric was shared with DNP Project Teams. Faculty will continue to evaluate the quality of the students' presentations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2023-0062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2023-0062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然护理实践博士(DNP)的学生已经使用规则来指导作业,但很少有人为专业报告创建ppt幻灯片。学生们可能会从标准化DNP期末项目的ppt演示中受益。目的:本研究的目的是进行一个质量改进项目,以评估一个基于文献的指导学生ppt演示和期末项目评分的标题。方法:两个教师独立评分的ppt幻灯片结构的最终DNP项目报告的文献为基础的标题。他们根据评级和评论修改了标题。九位内容专家对修订后的标题标准的相关性进行了评估。结果:三个标准在基于文献的标题评分上存在统计学差异。间信度低。修订了标题标准。9位专家的评级表明,修订后的标准是相关的;他们的评论刺激了修订。调查内容效度平均值为0.88,表明标准的相关性。结论:该标题需要进一步修订。将修订后的大纲张贴在学习管理系统的学生资源课程中,可以帮助学生在DNP课程和专业演讲中制作PowerPoint演示文稿。对护理的启示:该标题与DNP项目团队共享。教师将继续评估学生报告的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a PowerPoint Rubric for Doctor of Nursing Practice Projects.

Background: Although Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students have used rubrics to guide assignments, few have created PowerPoint slide decks for professional presentations. Students might benefit from a rubric that standardizes PowerPoint presentations on final DNP projects. Objective: The objective of the study is to conduct a quality improvement project to evaluate a literature-based rubric guiding students' PowerPoint presentations and the grading of final projects. Methods: Two faculty independently scored PowerPoint slides structuring final DNP project presentations for the literature-based rubric. They revised the rubric based on ratings and comments. Nine content experts rated the relevance of the revised rubric's criteria. Results: Three criteria differed at a statistically different level on the literature-based rubric's ratings. Interrater reliability was low. The rubric criteria were revised. Nine experts' ratings showed criteria on the revised rubric were relevant; their comments stimulated revisions. The Survey Content Validity Average was 0.88, suggesting the relevance of criteria. Conclusions: The rubric requires additional revisions. Posting the revised rubric in the student resource course of the learning management system might assist students to construct PowerPoint presentations in DNP courses and for professional presentations. Implications for Nursing: The rubric was shared with DNP Project Teams. Faculty will continue to evaluate the quality of the students' presentations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Doctor of Nursing Practice-Led Family Planning Services at a Rural Health Department. Nursing Interventions to Minimize the Unnecessary Replacement of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A Systematic Review. Implementing a Urinary Incontinence Screening, Treatment, and Referral Process for Women Veterans: A Quality Improvement Project. Choices 360: Addressing Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Adolescents Through an Abstinence-Based Seminar. Quality Improvement Project: Effectiveness of Diversion Tube Use on Blood Culture Contamination From Intravenous Catheters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1