IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES American journal of infection control Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2025.02.004
Christian B Wells, Erika R O'Neil, Michal J Sobieszczyk, Joseph E Marcus
{"title":"Diagnosis of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus Bacteremia in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.","authors":"Christian B Wells, Erika R O'Neil, Michal J Sobieszczyk, Joseph E Marcus","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are frequently cited as the most common cause of bacteremia in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), yet there is significant variability in reporting rates between centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who received ECMO with CoNS isolated from blood cultures between January 2022 and March 2024 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Previously reported bacteremia definitions were applied to determine the variability in rates by definition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 68 patients who received ECMO during the study period, 424 blood culture sets were obtained, of which 20 (4%) yielded CoNS in 13 (19%) patients. Only 5 (38%) patients had repeat isolation. Clinical variables, such as fever and leukocytosis, did not predict repeat positivity. Rates of CoNS varied from 0-15 infections per 1000 ECMO days depending on the definition utilized.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CoNS were frequently isolated in blood cultures from patients receiving ECMO. Despite the concern for biofilm formation, most CoNS were only isolated in a single culture. With the limited utility of clinical markers and frequent false positives, clinicians should order repeat blood cultures on those with CoNS isolated from blood cultures. We propose a standardized definition for CoNS bacteremia which entails isolations of CoNS from two subsequent blood cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.02.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS)经常被认为是体外膜氧合(ECMO)患者最常见的菌血症病因,但不同中心的报告率存在很大差异:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2022 年 1 月至 2024 年 3 月期间接受 ECMO 并从血液培养物中分离出 CoNS 的所有患者。采用之前报道的菌血症定义来确定不同定义下的菌血症发生率差异:在研究期间接受 ECMO 的 68 名患者中,共获得 424 套血液培养物,其中 13 名患者(19%)的 20 套(4%)培养出 CoNS。只有 5 例(38%)患者重复进行了分离。发热和白细胞增多等临床变量并不能预测重复阳性。根据采用的定义,每 1000 个 ECMO 日的 CoNS 感染率从 0-15 例不等:结论:接受 ECMO 患者的血液培养中经常分离到 CoNS。结论:接受 ECMO 患者的血液培养中经常分离到 CoNS,尽管生物膜的形成令人担忧,但大多数 CoNS 只在一次培养中分离出来。由于临床标记物的作用有限且经常出现假阳性,临床医生应要求从血培养物中分离出 CoNS 的患者重复血培养。我们建议对 CoNS 菌血症进行标准化定义,即从随后的两次血液培养中分离出 CoNS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnosis of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus Bacteremia in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Background: Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are frequently cited as the most common cause of bacteremia in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), yet there is significant variability in reporting rates between centers.

Methods: All patients who received ECMO with CoNS isolated from blood cultures between January 2022 and March 2024 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Previously reported bacteremia definitions were applied to determine the variability in rates by definition.

Results: In 68 patients who received ECMO during the study period, 424 blood culture sets were obtained, of which 20 (4%) yielded CoNS in 13 (19%) patients. Only 5 (38%) patients had repeat isolation. Clinical variables, such as fever and leukocytosis, did not predict repeat positivity. Rates of CoNS varied from 0-15 infections per 1000 ECMO days depending on the definition utilized.

Conclusion: CoNS were frequently isolated in blood cultures from patients receiving ECMO. Despite the concern for biofilm formation, most CoNS were only isolated in a single culture. With the limited utility of clinical markers and frequent false positives, clinicians should order repeat blood cultures on those with CoNS isolated from blood cultures. We propose a standardized definition for CoNS bacteremia which entails isolations of CoNS from two subsequent blood cultures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
期刊最新文献
Isolation Precautions Associated with COVID-19 Infections Among Immunocompromised Populations: A Multi-Center Study of Nine National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Understanding context to plan Antimicrobial Stewardship: a mixed method study in a Brazilian urban primary care. Review of State Regulations Related to Environmental Sanitation in Long-term Care Facilities. Unseen threats: Lumens 2.0 Study reveals the hidden challenges of cleaning lumened surgical instruments. Diagnosis of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus Bacteremia in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1