IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12398-1
Natacha Cerchiari, Alexandre Grangeiro, Paula Massa, Andreia Costa Santos, Patrícia Coelho de Soárez
{"title":"PrEP demand creation strategies for adolescents at increased risk of HIV infection in São Paulo, Brazil: a cost-consequence analysis.","authors":"Natacha Cerchiari, Alexandre Grangeiro, Paula Massa, Andreia Costa Santos, Patrícia Coelho de Soárez","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12398-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extension of PrEP coverage for vulnerable populations depends on demand creation strategies that aim to inform, encourage usage, and facilitate access to health services. However, there are no cost estimates for Brazil or Latin America regarding demand creation strategies focused on populations with higher vulnerability and risk of HIV infection. This analysis aims to assess the costs and health outcomes of different strategies used to create demand for PrEP for individuals aged 15 to 19 who identify as men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender women (TGW), or non-binary people assigned male at birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cost-consequence analysis of six demand creation strategies used in the \"PrEP1519 Study\" (chatbot strategy; dating apps strategy; social media strategy; socialization places strategy; NGOs strategy; direct referrals strategy). The analysis was conducted using data from January 2019 to December 2021. The evaluated outcome was the \"PrEP initiation ratio\" (PrEPIR), which represents the percentage of approached individuals who started PrEP. The cost analysis included direct costs related to personnel, promotional materials, testing, equipment, and services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strategy with the highest PrEPIR was the social media strategy (2.97% [95% CI 2.29-3.84]), followed by the socialization places strategy (2.05% [1.45-2.89]). The direct referrals strategy, which served as the baseline, had one of the lowest PrEPIR (0.36% [0.30-0.43]). The average cost per participant included ranged from $100.74 for the direct referrals strategy to $5,572.00 for the chatbot strategy. The strategy with the highest total cost was the chatbot strategy ($55,719.98), whereas the strategy with the lowest total cost was the NGOs strategy ($10,809.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite incurring higher costs, the implementation of more successful demand creation strategies (such as socialization places, social media, and dating apps) has the potential to increase PrEP usage and, consequently, reduce HIV infection in populations facing greater vulnerability. These findings can contribute to more effective planning and organization of prevention programs by healthcare services to reach these populations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This analysis is part of the \"PrEP1519 Study\" (protocol number 89993018.9.0000.0065).</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12398-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:扩大 PrEP 在易感人群中的覆盖面取决于旨在宣传、鼓励使用和促进获得医疗服务的创造需求战略。然而,巴西或拉丁美洲并没有针对艾滋病感染率和风险较高人群的需求创造策略的成本估算。本分析旨在评估不同策略的成本和健康结果,这些策略旨在为 15 至 19 岁的男男性行为者 (MSM)、变性女性 (TGW) 或出生时被指定为男性的非二元人群创造对 PrEP 的需求:对 "PrEP1519 研究 "中使用的六种需求创造策略(聊天机器人策略、约会应用程序策略、社交媒体策略、社交场所策略、非政府组织策略、直接转介策略)进行成本后果分析。分析使用了 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月的数据。评估结果是 "PrEP 启动率"(PrEPIR),即开始 PrEP 的接触者所占的百分比。成本分析包括与人员、宣传材料、检测、设备和服务相关的直接成本:PrEPIR 最高的策略是社交媒体策略(2.97% [95% CI 2.29-3.84]),其次是社交场所策略(2.05% [1.45-2.89])。作为基线的直接转介策略是 PrEPIR 最低的策略之一(0.36% [0.30-0.43])。每位参与者的平均成本从直接转介策略的 100.74 美元到聊天机器人策略的 5,572.00 美元不等。总成本最高的策略是聊天机器人策略(55,719.98 美元),而总成本最低的策略是非政府组织策略(10,809.80 美元):尽管成本较高,但实施更成功的需求创造策略(如社交场所、社交媒体和约会应用程序)有可能提高 PrEP 的使用率,从而减少面临更大脆弱性的人群的艾滋病感染。这些发现有助于医疗服务机构更有效地规划和组织预防项目,以覆盖这些人群:本分析是 "PrEP1519 研究"(方案编号 89993018.9.0000.0065)的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PrEP demand creation strategies for adolescents at increased risk of HIV infection in São Paulo, Brazil: a cost-consequence analysis.

Background: The extension of PrEP coverage for vulnerable populations depends on demand creation strategies that aim to inform, encourage usage, and facilitate access to health services. However, there are no cost estimates for Brazil or Latin America regarding demand creation strategies focused on populations with higher vulnerability and risk of HIV infection. This analysis aims to assess the costs and health outcomes of different strategies used to create demand for PrEP for individuals aged 15 to 19 who identify as men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender women (TGW), or non-binary people assigned male at birth.

Methods: Cost-consequence analysis of six demand creation strategies used in the "PrEP1519 Study" (chatbot strategy; dating apps strategy; social media strategy; socialization places strategy; NGOs strategy; direct referrals strategy). The analysis was conducted using data from January 2019 to December 2021. The evaluated outcome was the "PrEP initiation ratio" (PrEPIR), which represents the percentage of approached individuals who started PrEP. The cost analysis included direct costs related to personnel, promotional materials, testing, equipment, and services.

Results: The strategy with the highest PrEPIR was the social media strategy (2.97% [95% CI 2.29-3.84]), followed by the socialization places strategy (2.05% [1.45-2.89]). The direct referrals strategy, which served as the baseline, had one of the lowest PrEPIR (0.36% [0.30-0.43]). The average cost per participant included ranged from $100.74 for the direct referrals strategy to $5,572.00 for the chatbot strategy. The strategy with the highest total cost was the chatbot strategy ($55,719.98), whereas the strategy with the lowest total cost was the NGOs strategy ($10,809.80).

Conclusion: Despite incurring higher costs, the implementation of more successful demand creation strategies (such as socialization places, social media, and dating apps) has the potential to increase PrEP usage and, consequently, reduce HIV infection in populations facing greater vulnerability. These findings can contribute to more effective planning and organization of prevention programs by healthcare services to reach these populations.

Trial registration: This analysis is part of the "PrEP1519 Study" (protocol number 89993018.9.0000.0065).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Medicalization of female life stages: a qualitative research. Shared practices among primary health care workers: A time-motion study. The role of deans in implementing smoke-free campus policies: the case of medical schools in France. Health literacy interventions and health literacy-related outcomes for older adults: a systematic review. Impact of teleretinal screening program on diabetic retinopathy screening compliance rates in community health centers: a quasi-experimental study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1