小儿冠状静脉窦内消融的安全性。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1111/jce.16607
Shankar Baskar, Martin J. LaPage, Nicholas J. Ollberding, David S. Spar, Brynn E. Dechert, Audrey Dionne, Luis Ochoa, Ian Law, Peter P. Karpawich, Diana Torpoco-Rivera, Christopher W. Follansbee, Jason Garnreiter, Richard J. Czosek
{"title":"小儿冠状静脉窦内消融的安全性。","authors":"Shankar Baskar,&nbsp;Martin J. LaPage,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Ollberding,&nbsp;David S. Spar,&nbsp;Brynn E. Dechert,&nbsp;Audrey Dionne,&nbsp;Luis Ochoa,&nbsp;Ian Law,&nbsp;Peter P. Karpawich,&nbsp;Diana Torpoco-Rivera,&nbsp;Christopher W. Follansbee,&nbsp;Jason Garnreiter,&nbsp;Richard J. Czosek","doi":"10.1111/jce.16607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Catheter-based ablation in the coronary venous sinus (CS) can be associated with inadvertent coronary artery (CA) injury. However, a significant gap remains in the literature with regard to safety of such ablation in pediatrics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The primary aim of this study was to describe the safety of catheter-based ablation within the CS. Secondary aim was to describe the practice pattern of ablation energy source within the CS among pediatric centers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a multi-center, retrospective study over a period of 20 years (1999–2019) involving seven centers. Pediatric patients (≤ 21 years of age) undergoing ablation within the CS were included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 211 patients were included (median age: 14 [IQR: 10.5, 16.0]). Accessory pathways were the target in almost 90% of the patients with cryoablation in 55%, nonirrigated RF in 40% and irrigated RF in 6%. Only 16% had coronary arteriogram done before RF. There was a single patient who had CA injury, in the form of a transient spasm of the left circumflex CA following RF in the proximal CS. There was transient high-grade AV block in six patients (2.8%) who either had RF or cryoablation. There was no permanent AV block.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The use coronary arteriogram before RF in the CS is infrequent, although acute CA injury appears to be rare following such ablation. Transient heart block is not uncommon, and the operators need to be vigilant in monitoring AV nodal conduction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":"36 4","pages":"848-854"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of Ablation Within the Coronary Venous Sinus in Pediatric Patients\",\"authors\":\"Shankar Baskar,&nbsp;Martin J. LaPage,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Ollberding,&nbsp;David S. Spar,&nbsp;Brynn E. Dechert,&nbsp;Audrey Dionne,&nbsp;Luis Ochoa,&nbsp;Ian Law,&nbsp;Peter P. Karpawich,&nbsp;Diana Torpoco-Rivera,&nbsp;Christopher W. Follansbee,&nbsp;Jason Garnreiter,&nbsp;Richard J. Czosek\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jce.16607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Catheter-based ablation in the coronary venous sinus (CS) can be associated with inadvertent coronary artery (CA) injury. However, a significant gap remains in the literature with regard to safety of such ablation in pediatrics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The primary aim of this study was to describe the safety of catheter-based ablation within the CS. Secondary aim was to describe the practice pattern of ablation energy source within the CS among pediatric centers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a multi-center, retrospective study over a period of 20 years (1999–2019) involving seven centers. Pediatric patients (≤ 21 years of age) undergoing ablation within the CS were included.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 211 patients were included (median age: 14 [IQR: 10.5, 16.0]). Accessory pathways were the target in almost 90% of the patients with cryoablation in 55%, nonirrigated RF in 40% and irrigated RF in 6%. Only 16% had coronary arteriogram done before RF. There was a single patient who had CA injury, in the form of a transient spasm of the left circumflex CA following RF in the proximal CS. There was transient high-grade AV block in six patients (2.8%) who either had RF or cryoablation. There was no permanent AV block.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The use coronary arteriogram before RF in the CS is infrequent, although acute CA injury appears to be rare following such ablation. Transient heart block is not uncommon, and the operators need to be vigilant in monitoring AV nodal conduction.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"848-854\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16607\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16607","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:导管消融冠状静脉窦(CS)可能与非故意冠状动脉(CA)损伤有关。然而,文献中关于此类消融术在儿科的安全性仍然存在显著的差距。目的:本研究的主要目的是描述CS内导管消融的安全性。次要目的是描述儿科中心CS内消融能量源的实践模式。方法:这是一项为期20年(1999-2019)的多中心回顾性研究,涉及7个中心。在CS内接受消融术的儿童患者(≤21岁)被纳入。结果:共纳入211例患者(中位年龄:14岁[IQR: 10.5, 16.0])。近90%的冷冻消融患者的副神经通路为目标,55%的患者,40%的患者为非冲洗射频,6%的患者为冲洗射频。只有16%的患者在射频治疗前做了冠状动脉造影。有一个单独的病人有CA损伤,在近端CS射频后的左旋CA短暂痉挛的形式。有6例(2.8%)接受射频消融或冷冻消融的患者出现短暂的高级别房室传导阻滞。没有永久性房室传导阻滞。结论:射频消融后急性CA损伤的病例较少,但射频消融前冠状动脉造影的应用较少。短暂性心电传导阻滞并不少见,操作人员需警惕房室结传导的监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety of Ablation Within the Coronary Venous Sinus in Pediatric Patients

Background

Catheter-based ablation in the coronary venous sinus (CS) can be associated with inadvertent coronary artery (CA) injury. However, a significant gap remains in the literature with regard to safety of such ablation in pediatrics.

Objectives

The primary aim of this study was to describe the safety of catheter-based ablation within the CS. Secondary aim was to describe the practice pattern of ablation energy source within the CS among pediatric centers.

Methods

This was a multi-center, retrospective study over a period of 20 years (1999–2019) involving seven centers. Pediatric patients (≤ 21 years of age) undergoing ablation within the CS were included.

Results

A total of 211 patients were included (median age: 14 [IQR: 10.5, 16.0]). Accessory pathways were the target in almost 90% of the patients with cryoablation in 55%, nonirrigated RF in 40% and irrigated RF in 6%. Only 16% had coronary arteriogram done before RF. There was a single patient who had CA injury, in the form of a transient spasm of the left circumflex CA following RF in the proximal CS. There was transient high-grade AV block in six patients (2.8%) who either had RF or cryoablation. There was no permanent AV block.

Conclusion

The use coronary arteriogram before RF in the CS is infrequent, although acute CA injury appears to be rare following such ablation. Transient heart block is not uncommon, and the operators need to be vigilant in monitoring AV nodal conduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
期刊最新文献
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Pulsed-Field Ablation Versus Thermal Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: The PROMs-PFA Study. Impacts of Hemodynamic Support on Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation. Invasive Assessment of Right Ventricular Dysfunction Predicts Periprocedural Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Unplanned Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation. Zero-Contrast Versus Contrast-Guided Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Comparative Analysis of Procedural and Long-Term Outcomes. Post Pacing Interval Following Failed Anti-Tachycardia Pacing Predicts Epicardial Ventricular Tachycardia Circuits in Patients With Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1