利奈唑胺与万古霉素对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的体外活性比较。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Microbial pathogenesis Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107371
Perrynaz Ahmed Mahmood Al-Zehhawi, Nihad Taha Mohammed Jaddoa
{"title":"利奈唑胺与万古霉素对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的体外活性比较。","authors":"Perrynaz Ahmed Mahmood Al-Zehhawi,&nbsp;Nihad Taha Mohammed Jaddoa","doi":"10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Most microorganisms as well as bacteria live in a community under natural conditions. Bacteria adopted to biofilm mode of life more than 3 billion years ago to survive extreme, harsh environments. They become harmful when they acquire resistance to antibiotics and overcome the standard therapies, which is most commonly found in hospitals. Therefore, many studies have been published regarding antimicrobial resistance (AMR). <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> is a dangerous pathogen, ubiquitously prevalent as a commensal and opportunistic microorganism in human populations. Methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MRSA) is considered one of the major medical problems worldwide since they are frequent colonizers of implanted medical devices causing a variety of hospital-acquired infections. For many years, vancomycin has been the drug of choice for MRSA whereas linezolid is considered the last resort drug. This comparative, cross-sectional study investigated the effects of linezolid on biofilm formation in vitro compared to vancomycin across 85 MRSA isolates. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report high levels of linezolid resistance in MRSA in Iraq. In this brief report, 5 MRSA strains showed resistance to linezolid, with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 256 μg/ml. The exact same isolates exhibited vancomycin resistance with MIC values of 1024 μg/ml. All linezolid-resistant MRSA (LR-MRSA) strains demonstrated biofilm formation ability. Additionally, linezolid inhibited the expression of adhesion-related genes <em>cna</em> and <em>clfB</em>. The authors concluded that linezolid exerts a comparable effect to vancomycin in biofilm treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18599,"journal":{"name":"Microbial pathogenesis","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 107371"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linezolid versus vancomycin in vitro activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms\",\"authors\":\"Perrynaz Ahmed Mahmood Al-Zehhawi,&nbsp;Nihad Taha Mohammed Jaddoa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Most microorganisms as well as bacteria live in a community under natural conditions. Bacteria adopted to biofilm mode of life more than 3 billion years ago to survive extreme, harsh environments. They become harmful when they acquire resistance to antibiotics and overcome the standard therapies, which is most commonly found in hospitals. Therefore, many studies have been published regarding antimicrobial resistance (AMR). <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> is a dangerous pathogen, ubiquitously prevalent as a commensal and opportunistic microorganism in human populations. Methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MRSA) is considered one of the major medical problems worldwide since they are frequent colonizers of implanted medical devices causing a variety of hospital-acquired infections. For many years, vancomycin has been the drug of choice for MRSA whereas linezolid is considered the last resort drug. This comparative, cross-sectional study investigated the effects of linezolid on biofilm formation in vitro compared to vancomycin across 85 MRSA isolates. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report high levels of linezolid resistance in MRSA in Iraq. In this brief report, 5 MRSA strains showed resistance to linezolid, with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 256 μg/ml. The exact same isolates exhibited vancomycin resistance with MIC values of 1024 μg/ml. All linezolid-resistant MRSA (LR-MRSA) strains demonstrated biofilm formation ability. Additionally, linezolid inhibited the expression of adhesion-related genes <em>cna</em> and <em>clfB</em>. The authors concluded that linezolid exerts a comparable effect to vancomycin in biofilm treatment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbial pathogenesis\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbial pathogenesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882401025000968\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial pathogenesis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882401025000968","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数微生物和细菌在自然条件下群居生活。30多亿年前,细菌采用生物膜的生活方式,在极端恶劣的环境中生存下来。当它们获得对抗生素的耐药性并克服标准疗法(最常见于医院)时,它们就会变得有害。因此,许多关于抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的研究已经发表。金黄色葡萄球菌是一种危险的病原体,作为一种共生和机会性微生物在人群中普遍存在。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)被认为是世界范围内的主要医学问题之一,因为它们是植入医疗设备的常见定植菌,引起各种医院获得性感染。多年来,万古霉素一直是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的首选药物,而利奈唑胺则被认为是最后的药物。这项比较横断面研究考察了利奈唑胺与万古霉素对85株MRSA分离株体外生物膜形成的影响。据我们所知,这是第一个报道伊拉克MRSA对利奈唑胺高度耐药的研究。5株MRSA对利奈唑胺耐药,最小抑菌浓度(MIC)为256 μg/ml。该菌株表现出万古霉素耐药,MIC值为1024 μg/ml。所有耐利奈唑胺MRSA (LR-MRSA)菌株均表现出生物膜形成能力。此外,利奈唑胺抑制粘附相关基因cna和clfB的表达。作者得出结论,利奈唑胺在生物膜治疗中具有与万古霉素相当的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Linezolid versus vancomycin in vitro activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms
Most microorganisms as well as bacteria live in a community under natural conditions. Bacteria adopted to biofilm mode of life more than 3 billion years ago to survive extreme, harsh environments. They become harmful when they acquire resistance to antibiotics and overcome the standard therapies, which is most commonly found in hospitals. Therefore, many studies have been published regarding antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Staphylococcus aureus is a dangerous pathogen, ubiquitously prevalent as a commensal and opportunistic microorganism in human populations. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is considered one of the major medical problems worldwide since they are frequent colonizers of implanted medical devices causing a variety of hospital-acquired infections. For many years, vancomycin has been the drug of choice for MRSA whereas linezolid is considered the last resort drug. This comparative, cross-sectional study investigated the effects of linezolid on biofilm formation in vitro compared to vancomycin across 85 MRSA isolates. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report high levels of linezolid resistance in MRSA in Iraq. In this brief report, 5 MRSA strains showed resistance to linezolid, with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 256 μg/ml. The exact same isolates exhibited vancomycin resistance with MIC values of 1024 μg/ml. All linezolid-resistant MRSA (LR-MRSA) strains demonstrated biofilm formation ability. Additionally, linezolid inhibited the expression of adhesion-related genes cna and clfB. The authors concluded that linezolid exerts a comparable effect to vancomycin in biofilm treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbial pathogenesis
Microbial pathogenesis 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Microbial Pathogenesis publishes original contributions and reviews about the molecular and cellular mechanisms of infectious diseases. It covers microbiology, host-pathogen interaction and immunology related to infectious agents, including bacteria, fungi, viruses and protozoa. It also accepts papers in the field of clinical microbiology, with the exception of case reports. Research Areas Include: -Pathogenesis -Virulence factors -Host susceptibility or resistance -Immune mechanisms -Identification, cloning and sequencing of relevant genes -Genetic studies -Viruses, prokaryotic organisms and protozoa -Microbiota -Systems biology related to infectious diseases -Targets for vaccine design (pre-clinical studies)
期刊最新文献
A novel borneol-loaded PLGA/Chitosan nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of antioxidant, antibacterial, wound healing and cytotoxic activity on A549 cells Meihuacao extract in eradicating H.pylori: Network pharmacology analyses and experiment validation Genotypic diversity and zoonotic potential of Salmonella enterica from multiple hosts: implications for One Health Enhancing memory T cell responses through Soluble Leishmania antigen and natural adjuvants against Leishmania donovani in murine model CpCML subverts host PI3K/AKT–NF-κB signaling and autophagic flux via direct interaction with SUGT1 to facilitate Cryptosporidium parvum infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1