{"title":"为一个大型水资源回收设施开发工艺模型和生命周期评估,并比较生物固体工艺升级方案。","authors":"Daehyun Ko, John W Norton, Glen T Daigger","doi":"10.2166/wst.2025.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Life cycle assessment (LCA), coupled with process modeling to develop the life cycle inventory, is a valuable tool to assess differences in environmental performance when evaluating alternatives based on sustainability (triple-bottom-line) principles. Coupled with a whole plant process model (SUMO21), an LCA assessed the environmental performance of options to upgrade biosolids management for the Great Lakes Water Authority water resource recovery facility. All five alternatives evaluated (composting plus four anaerobic digestion alternatives) were able to meet the core objectives of the biosolids management system upgrade: (1) address ageing incinerators, (2) minimize the mass of biosolids landfilled, and (3) reduce greenhouse gas emissions, compared to the existing (baseline) system. The mass of solids to be managed was reduced for the anaerobic digestion alternatives but not for the composting alternatives. Environmental impacts were reduced for the composting alternative for all six impact categories considered (global warming, eutrophication, carcinogenics, ecotoxicity, respiratory effects, and fossil fuel depletion) relative to the baseline, and further reduced for all four anaerobic digestion alternatives evaluated. The results allowed a phased implementation plan to be developed, which could be evaluated based on other factors, such as costs and operational factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":23653,"journal":{"name":"Water Science and Technology","volume":"91 3","pages":"295-310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a process model and life cycle assessment for a large water resource recovery facility and comparison of biosolids process upgrade options.\",\"authors\":\"Daehyun Ko, John W Norton, Glen T Daigger\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wst.2025.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Life cycle assessment (LCA), coupled with process modeling to develop the life cycle inventory, is a valuable tool to assess differences in environmental performance when evaluating alternatives based on sustainability (triple-bottom-line) principles. Coupled with a whole plant process model (SUMO21), an LCA assessed the environmental performance of options to upgrade biosolids management for the Great Lakes Water Authority water resource recovery facility. All five alternatives evaluated (composting plus four anaerobic digestion alternatives) were able to meet the core objectives of the biosolids management system upgrade: (1) address ageing incinerators, (2) minimize the mass of biosolids landfilled, and (3) reduce greenhouse gas emissions, compared to the existing (baseline) system. The mass of solids to be managed was reduced for the anaerobic digestion alternatives but not for the composting alternatives. Environmental impacts were reduced for the composting alternative for all six impact categories considered (global warming, eutrophication, carcinogenics, ecotoxicity, respiratory effects, and fossil fuel depletion) relative to the baseline, and further reduced for all four anaerobic digestion alternatives evaluated. The results allowed a phased implementation plan to be developed, which could be evaluated based on other factors, such as costs and operational factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"91 3\",\"pages\":\"295-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2025.008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2025.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of a process model and life cycle assessment for a large water resource recovery facility and comparison of biosolids process upgrade options.
Life cycle assessment (LCA), coupled with process modeling to develop the life cycle inventory, is a valuable tool to assess differences in environmental performance when evaluating alternatives based on sustainability (triple-bottom-line) principles. Coupled with a whole plant process model (SUMO21), an LCA assessed the environmental performance of options to upgrade biosolids management for the Great Lakes Water Authority water resource recovery facility. All five alternatives evaluated (composting plus four anaerobic digestion alternatives) were able to meet the core objectives of the biosolids management system upgrade: (1) address ageing incinerators, (2) minimize the mass of biosolids landfilled, and (3) reduce greenhouse gas emissions, compared to the existing (baseline) system. The mass of solids to be managed was reduced for the anaerobic digestion alternatives but not for the composting alternatives. Environmental impacts were reduced for the composting alternative for all six impact categories considered (global warming, eutrophication, carcinogenics, ecotoxicity, respiratory effects, and fossil fuel depletion) relative to the baseline, and further reduced for all four anaerobic digestion alternatives evaluated. The results allowed a phased implementation plan to be developed, which could be evaluated based on other factors, such as costs and operational factors.
期刊介绍:
Water Science and Technology publishes peer-reviewed papers on all aspects of the science and technology of water and wastewater. Papers are selected by a rigorous peer review procedure with the aim of rapid and wide dissemination of research results, development and application of new techniques, and related managerial and policy issues. Scientists, engineers, consultants, managers and policy-makers will find this journal essential as a permanent record of progress of research activities and their practical applications.