德国“循证实践信心(EPIC)量表”对专职医疗人员的信度和效度。

IF 1.7 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2024.12.006
Alexander Elser , Moritz Scherer , Maria Stadel , Sven F. Garbade , Gudrun Diermayr
{"title":"德国“循证实践信心(EPIC)量表”对专职医疗人员的信度和效度。","authors":"Alexander Elser ,&nbsp;Moritz Scherer ,&nbsp;Maria Stadel ,&nbsp;Sven F. Garbade ,&nbsp;Gudrun Diermayr","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Evidence-Based Practice Confidence (EPIC) Scale measures health professionals’ self-efficacy associated with evidence-based practice activities. The scale has been cross-culturally translated into German together with physical therapists. To support its use in German-speaking countries, the measurement properties of the scale need to be determined. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to assess the measurement properties of the German EPIC scale. In a preparatory step, we aimed to evaluate the comprehensibility of the scale among German-speaking occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, and nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>First, semi-structured cognitive interviews were used to evaluate the comprehensibility of the EPIC scale. Second, a longitudinal online survey with repeated measures (baseline and retest survey) was conducted. The target group included physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, and nurses from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Reliability, responsiveness, and validity were evaluated using internal consistency, test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement, known-groups method, exploratory factor analysis and the minimal detectable change, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Comprehensibility of the German EPIC scale was confirmed by eleven health care professionals (four occupational therapists, two speech and language therapists, five nurses). The baseline and the retest surveys were completed by 708 and 222 participants, respectively. The measure demonstrated an internal consistency of .930, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability of .936 (95% CI: .917 to .951). The standard error of measurement was 4.92, and the minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level was 6.02. All hypotheses in the known-groups method were confirmed, and construct validity was acceptable. Factor analysis revealed two main factors affecting the results of the scale.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings provide evidence that supports the use of the German EPIC scale among health professionals. For instance, it can be used to evaluate self-efficacy during EBP training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"193 ","pages":"Pages 1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of the German “Evidence-Based Practice Confidence (EPIC) Scale” for allied health professionals\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Elser ,&nbsp;Moritz Scherer ,&nbsp;Maria Stadel ,&nbsp;Sven F. Garbade ,&nbsp;Gudrun Diermayr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.12.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Evidence-Based Practice Confidence (EPIC) Scale measures health professionals’ self-efficacy associated with evidence-based practice activities. The scale has been cross-culturally translated into German together with physical therapists. To support its use in German-speaking countries, the measurement properties of the scale need to be determined. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to assess the measurement properties of the German EPIC scale. In a preparatory step, we aimed to evaluate the comprehensibility of the scale among German-speaking occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, and nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>First, semi-structured cognitive interviews were used to evaluate the comprehensibility of the EPIC scale. Second, a longitudinal online survey with repeated measures (baseline and retest survey) was conducted. The target group included physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, and nurses from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Reliability, responsiveness, and validity were evaluated using internal consistency, test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement, known-groups method, exploratory factor analysis and the minimal detectable change, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Comprehensibility of the German EPIC scale was confirmed by eleven health care professionals (four occupational therapists, two speech and language therapists, five nurses). The baseline and the retest surveys were completed by 708 and 222 participants, respectively. The measure demonstrated an internal consistency of .930, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability of .936 (95% CI: .917 to .951). The standard error of measurement was 4.92, and the minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level was 6.02. All hypotheses in the known-groups method were confirmed, and construct validity was acceptable. Factor analysis revealed two main factors affecting the results of the scale.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings provide evidence that supports the use of the German EPIC scale among health professionals. For instance, it can be used to evaluate self-efficacy during EBP training.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen\",\"volume\":\"193 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724002812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724002812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:循证实践信心(EPIC)量表测量卫生专业人员与循证实践活动相关的自我效能感。该量表与物理治疗师一起被跨文化翻译成德语。为了支持它在德语国家的使用,需要确定秤的测量特性。因此,本研究的主要目的是评估德国EPIC量表的测量特性。在准备阶段,我们旨在评估德语职业治疗师、言语和语言治疗师和护士对量表的可理解性。方法:首先,采用半结构化认知访谈法评估EPIC量表的可理解性。其次,通过重复测量(基线和复测调查)进行纵向在线调查。目标群体包括来自德国、奥地利和瑞士的物理治疗师、职业治疗师、言语和语言治疗师以及护士。信度、响应性和效度分别采用内部一致性、重测信度、测量标准误差、已知群体法、探索性因子分析和最小可检测变化进行评估。结果:11名卫生保健专业人员(4名职业治疗师、2名言语和语言治疗师、5名护士)对德语EPIC量表的可理解性进行了确认。基线调查和复测调查分别由708名和222名参与者完成。测量结果显示内部一致性为0.930,类内相关系数(ICC)的重测信度为0.936 (95% CI: 0.917至0.951)。测量的标准误差为4.92,在95%置信水平上的最小可检测变化为6.02。已知群体法的所有假设均得到证实,结构效度可接受。因子分析揭示了影响量表结果的两个主要因素。结论:研究结果为支持在卫生专业人员中使用德国EPIC量表提供了证据。例如,它可以用于评估EBP训练期间的自我效能感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability and validity of the German “Evidence-Based Practice Confidence (EPIC) Scale” for allied health professionals

Introduction

The Evidence-Based Practice Confidence (EPIC) Scale measures health professionals’ self-efficacy associated with evidence-based practice activities. The scale has been cross-culturally translated into German together with physical therapists. To support its use in German-speaking countries, the measurement properties of the scale need to be determined. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to assess the measurement properties of the German EPIC scale. In a preparatory step, we aimed to evaluate the comprehensibility of the scale among German-speaking occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, and nurses.

Methods

First, semi-structured cognitive interviews were used to evaluate the comprehensibility of the EPIC scale. Second, a longitudinal online survey with repeated measures (baseline and retest survey) was conducted. The target group included physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, and nurses from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Reliability, responsiveness, and validity were evaluated using internal consistency, test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement, known-groups method, exploratory factor analysis and the minimal detectable change, respectively.

Results

Comprehensibility of the German EPIC scale was confirmed by eleven health care professionals (four occupational therapists, two speech and language therapists, five nurses). The baseline and the retest surveys were completed by 708 and 222 participants, respectively. The measure demonstrated an internal consistency of .930, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability of .936 (95% CI: .917 to .951). The standard error of measurement was 4.92, and the minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level was 6.02. All hypotheses in the known-groups method were confirmed, and construct validity was acceptable. Factor analysis revealed two main factors affecting the results of the scale.

Conclusion

The findings provide evidence that supports the use of the German EPIC scale among health professionals. For instance, it can be used to evaluate self-efficacy during EBP training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
[Clinical testing of the updated S3-level guideline for non-specific neck pain with physiotherapists and patients: A mixed-methods approach]. Ein neuer Ansatz für Versorgungsevaluationen: Erprobung des PopGroupers für Vergleichsgruppenbildung und Morbiditätsmessung am Beispiel der DMP KHK und Brustkrebs Übersetzung und Validitätsprüfung der Selbsteinschätzungsskala für digitale Kompetenzen Pflegestudierender Status quo des Antibiotic Stewardship in deutschen Krankenhäusern aus der Perspektive der Krankenhausapotheker*innen – Ergebnisse der ADKA-Umfrage 2023 „Kaukasisch“ in medizinischen Studien: Ethische, rechtliche und wissenschaftliche Perspektiven am Beispiel der ophthalmologischen Studie „Low-dose AtropIne for Myopia Control in Children“ (AIM)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1