Robert F. Kushner, Donna H. Ryan, John Deanfield, Alexander Kokkinos, Cintia Cercato, John Wilding, Bartolome Burguera, Chau-Chung Wu, Anca-Elena Craciun, Denes Pall, Irene Hramiak, Jøran Hjelmesæth, Nina M. Harder-Lauridsen, Petra Weimers, Ole Kleist Jeppesen, Klaus Kallenbach, A. Michael Lincoff, Ildiko Lingvay
{"title":"semaglutide与安慰剂在SELECT研究中的安全性:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Robert F. Kushner, Donna H. Ryan, John Deanfield, Alexander Kokkinos, Cintia Cercato, John Wilding, Bartolome Burguera, Chau-Chung Wu, Anca-Elena Craciun, Denes Pall, Irene Hramiak, Jøran Hjelmesæth, Nina M. Harder-Lauridsen, Petra Weimers, Ole Kleist Jeppesen, Klaus Kallenbach, A. Michael Lincoff, Ildiko Lingvay","doi":"10.1002/oby.24222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study was to assess safety of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg versus placebo, beyond reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, in patients with established cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Safety data focused on serious adverse events (SAEs), all adverse events (AEs) leading to permanent treatment discontinuation irrespective of seriousness, and prespecified AEs of special interest irrespective of seriousness. Tests of treatment differences were determined by two-sided <i>p</i> values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The proportion of patients with SAEs was lower with semaglutide versus placebo (33.4% vs. 36.4%; <i>p</i> < 0.001), primarily driven by cardiac disorders (11.5% vs. 13.5%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The proportion of patients with AEs leading to discontinuation was higher with semaglutide versus placebo (16.6% vs. 8.2%; <i>p</i> < 0.001), a difference driven by gastrointestinal disorders (10.0% vs. 2.0%); however, proportions due to SAEs leading to discontinuation were similar (3.6% vs. 4.1%). Suicide/self-injury SAEs were low and balanced between groups (0.11% in both groups). Gallbladder-related disorders were more frequent with semaglutide versus placebo (2.8% vs. 2.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.04), mainly driven by cholelithiasis (1.4% vs. 1.1%), whereas proportions of cholecystitis were similar between groups (0.6% vs. 0.6%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The long-term safety profile observed in the Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with Overweight or Obesity (SELECT) study is consistent with previously reported semaglutide studies. No new safety concerns were identified for once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":215,"journal":{"name":"Obesity","volume":"33 3","pages":"452-462"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oby.24222","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety profile of semaglutide versus placebo in the SELECT study: a randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Robert F. Kushner, Donna H. Ryan, John Deanfield, Alexander Kokkinos, Cintia Cercato, John Wilding, Bartolome Burguera, Chau-Chung Wu, Anca-Elena Craciun, Denes Pall, Irene Hramiak, Jøran Hjelmesæth, Nina M. Harder-Lauridsen, Petra Weimers, Ole Kleist Jeppesen, Klaus Kallenbach, A. Michael Lincoff, Ildiko Lingvay\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/oby.24222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The objective of this study was to assess safety of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg versus placebo, beyond reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, in patients with established cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Safety data focused on serious adverse events (SAEs), all adverse events (AEs) leading to permanent treatment discontinuation irrespective of seriousness, and prespecified AEs of special interest irrespective of seriousness. Tests of treatment differences were determined by two-sided <i>p</i> values.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The proportion of patients with SAEs was lower with semaglutide versus placebo (33.4% vs. 36.4%; <i>p</i> < 0.001), primarily driven by cardiac disorders (11.5% vs. 13.5%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The proportion of patients with AEs leading to discontinuation was higher with semaglutide versus placebo (16.6% vs. 8.2%; <i>p</i> < 0.001), a difference driven by gastrointestinal disorders (10.0% vs. 2.0%); however, proportions due to SAEs leading to discontinuation were similar (3.6% vs. 4.1%). Suicide/self-injury SAEs were low and balanced between groups (0.11% in both groups). Gallbladder-related disorders were more frequent with semaglutide versus placebo (2.8% vs. 2.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.04), mainly driven by cholelithiasis (1.4% vs. 1.1%), whereas proportions of cholecystitis were similar between groups (0.6% vs. 0.6%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The long-term safety profile observed in the Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with Overweight or Obesity (SELECT) study is consistent with previously reported semaglutide studies. No new safety concerns were identified for once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"452-462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oby.24222\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.24222\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.24222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究的目的是评估已确诊心血管疾病、超重或肥胖患者每周一次皮下注射2.4毫克塞马鲁肽与安慰剂相比,除了减少主要心血管不良事件之外的安全性:安全性数据主要包括严重不良事件(SAE)、导致永久性中断治疗的所有不良事件(AE)(无论其严重程度如何)以及预设的特殊不良事件(AE)(无论其严重程度如何)。治疗差异检验采用双侧 P 值:结果:与安慰剂相比,使用塞马鲁肽发生 SAEs 的患者比例较低(33.4% 对 36.4%;P 结论:塞马鲁肽的长期安全性状况与安慰剂相比更佳:塞马鲁肽对超重或肥胖症患者心血管结果的影响(SELECT)研究中观察到的长期安全性与之前报道的塞马鲁肽研究一致。没有发现每周一次的塞马鲁肽 2.4 毫克有新的安全性问题。
Safety profile of semaglutide versus placebo in the SELECT study: a randomized controlled trial
Objective
The objective of this study was to assess safety of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg versus placebo, beyond reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, in patients with established cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity.
Methods
Safety data focused on serious adverse events (SAEs), all adverse events (AEs) leading to permanent treatment discontinuation irrespective of seriousness, and prespecified AEs of special interest irrespective of seriousness. Tests of treatment differences were determined by two-sided p values.
Results
The proportion of patients with SAEs was lower with semaglutide versus placebo (33.4% vs. 36.4%; p < 0.001), primarily driven by cardiac disorders (11.5% vs. 13.5%; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with AEs leading to discontinuation was higher with semaglutide versus placebo (16.6% vs. 8.2%; p < 0.001), a difference driven by gastrointestinal disorders (10.0% vs. 2.0%); however, proportions due to SAEs leading to discontinuation were similar (3.6% vs. 4.1%). Suicide/self-injury SAEs were low and balanced between groups (0.11% in both groups). Gallbladder-related disorders were more frequent with semaglutide versus placebo (2.8% vs. 2.3%; p = 0.04), mainly driven by cholelithiasis (1.4% vs. 1.1%), whereas proportions of cholecystitis were similar between groups (0.6% vs. 0.6%).
Conclusions
The long-term safety profile observed in the Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with Overweight or Obesity (SELECT) study is consistent with previously reported semaglutide studies. No new safety concerns were identified for once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg.
期刊介绍:
Obesity is the official journal of The Obesity Society and is the premier source of information for increasing knowledge, fostering translational research from basic to population science, and promoting better treatment for people with obesity. Obesity publishes important peer-reviewed research and cutting-edge reviews, commentaries, and public health and medical developments.