M.K. Lonneman, L. Pumiglia, B. Zhang, A.A. Edinger, J. Dejong, O.O. Akinmoladun, J.C. Van Eaton, A. Kelly, K. Dolezal, A. Enzerink, J.J. Glaser, J.R. Bingham, J. Oliver
{"title":"“吸的麻烦”排除故障伤口真空:视频为基础的课程开发和实施在一个活组织模型","authors":"M.K. Lonneman, L. Pumiglia, B. Zhang, A.A. Edinger, J. Dejong, O.O. Akinmoladun, J.C. Van Eaton, A. Kelly, K. Dolezal, A. Enzerink, J.J. Glaser, J.R. Bingham, J. Oliver","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We hypothesized that non-surgeon, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) naïve participants would better identify device functions and troubleshoot failures after being exposed to a video curriculum (VC) compared to similar participants exposed to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). VC and critical action step development was followed by randomization of 115 non-surgical, NPWT naïve participants into either the CPG or VC study groups. Participants individually identified components of the NPWT system and then worked as a team to troubleshoot three scenarios on an in vivo porcine model. VC participants better identified all NPWT components and functions (p < 0.001), demonstrated correct cannister attachment (p < 0.001) and performed a seal check (p < 0.001). VC teams performed more critical action steps in the leak (p = 0.011) and obstruction (p = 0.001) scenarios. In post-event surveys, participants were more likely to find the VC easy to use and informative and were likely to recommend the videos to a colleague (p = 0.008, p = 0.019, p = 0.02). VC participants demonstrated improved competency in individual NPWT component identification and team-based troubleshooting of NPWT failures. This VC represents an effective alternative to existing CPGs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"243 ","pages":"Article 116244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Sucking the trouble” out of troubleshooting wound vacs: Video based curriculum development and implementation in a live tissue model\",\"authors\":\"M.K. Lonneman, L. Pumiglia, B. Zhang, A.A. Edinger, J. Dejong, O.O. Akinmoladun, J.C. Van Eaton, A. Kelly, K. Dolezal, A. Enzerink, J.J. Glaser, J.R. Bingham, J. Oliver\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We hypothesized that non-surgeon, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) naïve participants would better identify device functions and troubleshoot failures after being exposed to a video curriculum (VC) compared to similar participants exposed to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). VC and critical action step development was followed by randomization of 115 non-surgical, NPWT naïve participants into either the CPG or VC study groups. Participants individually identified components of the NPWT system and then worked as a team to troubleshoot three scenarios on an in vivo porcine model. VC participants better identified all NPWT components and functions (p < 0.001), demonstrated correct cannister attachment (p < 0.001) and performed a seal check (p < 0.001). VC teams performed more critical action steps in the leak (p = 0.011) and obstruction (p = 0.001) scenarios. In post-event surveys, participants were more likely to find the VC easy to use and informative and were likely to recommend the videos to a colleague (p = 0.008, p = 0.019, p = 0.02). VC participants demonstrated improved competency in individual NPWT component identification and team-based troubleshooting of NPWT failures. This VC represents an effective alternative to existing CPGs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"243 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025000662\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025000662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们假设,非外科医生负压伤口治疗(NPWT) naïve参与者在暴露于视频课程(VC)后,与暴露于临床实践指南(cpg)的类似参与者相比,能够更好地识别设备功能并排除故障。VC和关键动作步骤发展之后,将115名非手术NPWT naïve参与者随机分为CPG或VC研究组。参与者分别确定了NPWT系统的组成部分,然后作为一个团队在猪体内模型上解决了三种情况。VC参与者更好地识别了NPWT的所有组成部分和功能(p <;0.001),证明了正确的罐连接(p <;0.001),并执行密封检查(p <;0.001)。VC团队在泄漏(p = 0.011)和阻塞(p = 0.001)情况下执行了更多关键的操作步骤。在事后调查中,参与者更有可能发现VC易于使用和信息丰富,并有可能将视频推荐给同事(p = 0.008, p = 0.019, p = 0.02)。VC参与者在单个NPWT组件识别和基于团队的NPWT故障排除方面表现出提高的能力。该VC代表了现有cpg的有效替代方案。
“Sucking the trouble” out of troubleshooting wound vacs: Video based curriculum development and implementation in a live tissue model
We hypothesized that non-surgeon, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) naïve participants would better identify device functions and troubleshoot failures after being exposed to a video curriculum (VC) compared to similar participants exposed to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). VC and critical action step development was followed by randomization of 115 non-surgical, NPWT naïve participants into either the CPG or VC study groups. Participants individually identified components of the NPWT system and then worked as a team to troubleshoot three scenarios on an in vivo porcine model. VC participants better identified all NPWT components and functions (p < 0.001), demonstrated correct cannister attachment (p < 0.001) and performed a seal check (p < 0.001). VC teams performed more critical action steps in the leak (p = 0.011) and obstruction (p = 0.001) scenarios. In post-event surveys, participants were more likely to find the VC easy to use and informative and were likely to recommend the videos to a colleague (p = 0.008, p = 0.019, p = 0.02). VC participants demonstrated improved competency in individual NPWT component identification and team-based troubleshooting of NPWT failures. This VC represents an effective alternative to existing CPGs.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.