评估TikTok作为神经轴分娩镇痛医学信息来源的准确性和质量

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY International journal of obstetric anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104310
B.M. Bak , A. Streff , R.S. D’Souza , E.E. Sharpe
{"title":"评估TikTok作为神经轴分娩镇痛医学信息来源的准确性和质量","authors":"B.M. Bak ,&nbsp;A. Streff ,&nbsp;R.S. D’Souza ,&nbsp;E.E. Sharpe","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Neuraxial labor analgesia is the most effective method of pain relief during childbirth. Despite its proven efficacy and safety, misconceptions about neuraxial analgesia persist. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and quality of TikTok videos on neuraxial labor analgesia, hypothesizing that many would contain inaccurate or low-quality information.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the “Top” search function in TikTok, we identified the first 150 videos using the following keywords: “epidural,” “epidural for labor,” “epidural for pregnancy,” “epidural experience,” “getting an epidural,” and “epidural risks.” Primary outcomes included the proportion of videos containing inaccurate information and overall quality of videos based on modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-six (10%) of the 266 included videos contained inaccurate information. Median (interquartile range = IQR) mDISCERN score for all included videos was 1.0 (IQR = 2.0), indicating poor quality. Videos from medical sources scored higher in quality (median = 2.0, IQR = 1.0) than non-medical sources (median = 0.0, IQR = 2.0; <em>P</em> &lt;0.001), however both scores were below the mDISCERN threshold for high video-quality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the presence of inaccurate information on popular social media platforms such as TikTok regarding neuraxial labor analgesia. Many videos are of low quality and lack comprehensive, balanced, and unbiased information. This poses a significant risk to patient understanding and informed decision-making. Medical professionals and organizations should actively engage on platforms such as TikTok to disseminate accurate, high-quality information, thereby helping to combat the spread of misleading information.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 104310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the accuracy and quality of TikTok as a source of medical information on neuraxial labor analgesia\",\"authors\":\"B.M. Bak ,&nbsp;A. Streff ,&nbsp;R.S. D’Souza ,&nbsp;E.E. Sharpe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Neuraxial labor analgesia is the most effective method of pain relief during childbirth. Despite its proven efficacy and safety, misconceptions about neuraxial analgesia persist. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and quality of TikTok videos on neuraxial labor analgesia, hypothesizing that many would contain inaccurate or low-quality information.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the “Top” search function in TikTok, we identified the first 150 videos using the following keywords: “epidural,” “epidural for labor,” “epidural for pregnancy,” “epidural experience,” “getting an epidural,” and “epidural risks.” Primary outcomes included the proportion of videos containing inaccurate information and overall quality of videos based on modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-six (10%) of the 266 included videos contained inaccurate information. Median (interquartile range = IQR) mDISCERN score for all included videos was 1.0 (IQR = 2.0), indicating poor quality. Videos from medical sources scored higher in quality (median = 2.0, IQR = 1.0) than non-medical sources (median = 0.0, IQR = 2.0; <em>P</em> &lt;0.001), however both scores were below the mDISCERN threshold for high video-quality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the presence of inaccurate information on popular social media platforms such as TikTok regarding neuraxial labor analgesia. Many videos are of low quality and lack comprehensive, balanced, and unbiased information. This poses a significant risk to patient understanding and informed decision-making. Medical professionals and organizations should actively engage on platforms such as TikTok to disseminate accurate, high-quality information, thereby helping to combat the spread of misleading information.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X24003224\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X24003224","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:轴向分娩镇痛是缓解分娩疼痛最有效的方法。尽管已证实其有效性和安全性,但对轴向镇痛的误解仍然存在。这项横断面研究旨在评估TikTok关于神经轴分娩镇痛的视频的准确性和质量,假设许多视频包含不准确或低质量的信息。方法使用TikTok的“Top”搜索功能,我们使用以下关键词识别出前150个视频:“硬膜外”、“硬膜外分娩”、“硬膜外妊娠”、“硬膜外体验”、“硬膜外麻醉”和“硬膜外风险”。主要结果包括包含不准确信息的视频比例和基于改进的DISCERN (mDISCERN)分数的视频总体质量。结果266个视频中有26个(10%)包含不准确信息。所有纳入的视频的mDISCERN评分中位数(四分位间距= IQR)为1.0 (IQR = 2.0),表明质量较差。医学来源的视频质量得分(中位数= 2.0,IQR = 1.0)高于非医学来源的视频(中位数= 0.0,IQR = 2.0;P <0.001),但是两个分数都低于mDISCERN高视频质量的阈值。本研究强调了TikTok等热门社交媒体平台上关于神经轴分娩镇痛的不准确信息的存在。许多视频质量不高,缺乏全面、平衡和公正的信息。这对患者的理解和知情决策构成了重大风险。医疗专业人士和医疗机构应积极参与抖音等平台,传播准确、高质量的信息,打击误导性信息的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the accuracy and quality of TikTok as a source of medical information on neuraxial labor analgesia

Background

Neuraxial labor analgesia is the most effective method of pain relief during childbirth. Despite its proven efficacy and safety, misconceptions about neuraxial analgesia persist. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and quality of TikTok videos on neuraxial labor analgesia, hypothesizing that many would contain inaccurate or low-quality information.

Methods

Using the “Top” search function in TikTok, we identified the first 150 videos using the following keywords: “epidural,” “epidural for labor,” “epidural for pregnancy,” “epidural experience,” “getting an epidural,” and “epidural risks.” Primary outcomes included the proportion of videos containing inaccurate information and overall quality of videos based on modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) scores.

Results

Twenty-six (10%) of the 266 included videos contained inaccurate information. Median (interquartile range = IQR) mDISCERN score for all included videos was 1.0 (IQR = 2.0), indicating poor quality. Videos from medical sources scored higher in quality (median = 2.0, IQR = 1.0) than non-medical sources (median = 0.0, IQR = 2.0; P <0.001), however both scores were below the mDISCERN threshold for high video-quality.

Conclusion

This study highlights the presence of inaccurate information on popular social media platforms such as TikTok regarding neuraxial labor analgesia. Many videos are of low quality and lack comprehensive, balanced, and unbiased information. This poses a significant risk to patient understanding and informed decision-making. Medical professionals and organizations should actively engage on platforms such as TikTok to disseminate accurate, high-quality information, thereby helping to combat the spread of misleading information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient. • Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered. • The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia. • Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome. The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
期刊最新文献
Neuraxial anesthesia for surgical pregnancy termination in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension: a case series (2019–2025) Time-dependent placental transfer of sevoflurane during cesarean delivery under general anesthesia: a prospective observational study Emergent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia for a patient with hemoglobin Beth Israel: a case report Does parity alone explain intrathecal ropivacaine requirements for labor analgesia? In response to “Median effective dose (ED50) of intrathecal ropivacaine for labor analgesia initiation in nulliparous vs. multiparous women: an up-down sequential allocation study” Stick with the epidural blood patch or consider fibrin glue for management of postdural puncture headache?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1