抗生素管理计划和优化处方实践中的人工智能驱动方法:系统综述

IF 7.8 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103089
Hamid Harandi , Maryam Shafaati , Mohammadreza Salehi , Mohammad Mahdi Roozbahani , Keyhan Mohammadi , Samaneh Akbarpour , Ramin Rahimnia , Gholamreza Hassanpour , Yasin Rahmani , Arash Seifi
{"title":"抗生素管理计划和优化处方实践中的人工智能驱动方法:系统综述","authors":"Hamid Harandi ,&nbsp;Maryam Shafaati ,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Salehi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Mahdi Roozbahani ,&nbsp;Keyhan Mohammadi ,&nbsp;Samaneh Akbarpour ,&nbsp;Ramin Rahimnia ,&nbsp;Gholamreza Hassanpour ,&nbsp;Yasin Rahmani ,&nbsp;Arash Seifi","doi":"10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are essential in optimizing the use of antibiotics to address the global concern of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as promising tools for enhancing ASPs efficiency by improving antibiotic prescription accuracy, resistance prediction, and dosage optimization. This systematic review evaluated the application of AI-driven ASPs, focusing on their methodologies, outcomes, and challenges. We searched all of the databases in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase using keywords related to “AI” and “antibiotic.” We only included studies that used AI and ML algorithms in ASPs, with the main criteria being empirical antibiotic selection, dose adjustment, and ASP adherence. There were no limits on time, setting, or language. Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion and assessed their risk of bias using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) Assessment tool for observational studies. Implementation studies underscored AI's potential for improving antimicrobial stewardship programs. Two studies showed that logistic regression, boosted-tree models, and gradient-boosting machines could effectively describe the difference between patients who needed to change their antibiotic regimen and those who did not. Twenty-four studies have confirmed the role of machine learning in optimizing empirical antibiotic selection, predicting resistance, and enhancing therapy appropriateness, all of which have the potential to reduce mortality rates. Additionally, machine learning algorithms showed promise in optimizing antibiotic dosing, particularly for vancomycin. This systematic review aimed to highlight various AI models, their applications in ASPs, and the resulting impact on healthcare outcomes. Machine learning and AI models effectively enhance antibiotic stewardship by optimizing patient interventions, empirical antibiotic selection, resistance prediction, and dosing. However, it subtly draws attention to the differences between high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), highlighting the structural difficulties that LMICs confront while simultaneously highlighting the progress made in HICs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55458,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 103089"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence-driven approaches in antibiotic stewardship programs and optimizing prescription practices: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Hamid Harandi ,&nbsp;Maryam Shafaati ,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Salehi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Mahdi Roozbahani ,&nbsp;Keyhan Mohammadi ,&nbsp;Samaneh Akbarpour ,&nbsp;Ramin Rahimnia ,&nbsp;Gholamreza Hassanpour ,&nbsp;Yasin Rahmani ,&nbsp;Arash Seifi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are essential in optimizing the use of antibiotics to address the global concern of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as promising tools for enhancing ASPs efficiency by improving antibiotic prescription accuracy, resistance prediction, and dosage optimization. This systematic review evaluated the application of AI-driven ASPs, focusing on their methodologies, outcomes, and challenges. We searched all of the databases in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase using keywords related to “AI” and “antibiotic.” We only included studies that used AI and ML algorithms in ASPs, with the main criteria being empirical antibiotic selection, dose adjustment, and ASP adherence. There were no limits on time, setting, or language. Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion and assessed their risk of bias using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) Assessment tool for observational studies. Implementation studies underscored AI's potential for improving antimicrobial stewardship programs. Two studies showed that logistic regression, boosted-tree models, and gradient-boosting machines could effectively describe the difference between patients who needed to change their antibiotic regimen and those who did not. Twenty-four studies have confirmed the role of machine learning in optimizing empirical antibiotic selection, predicting resistance, and enhancing therapy appropriateness, all of which have the potential to reduce mortality rates. Additionally, machine learning algorithms showed promise in optimizing antibiotic dosing, particularly for vancomycin. This systematic review aimed to highlight various AI models, their applications in ASPs, and the resulting impact on healthcare outcomes. Machine learning and AI models effectively enhance antibiotic stewardship by optimizing patient interventions, empirical antibiotic selection, resistance prediction, and dosing. However, it subtly draws attention to the differences between high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), highlighting the structural difficulties that LMICs confront while simultaneously highlighting the progress made in HICs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0933365725000247\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0933365725000247","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗菌药物管理规划(asp)对于优化抗生素使用以解决全球关注的抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)至关重要。人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)已经成为通过提高抗生素处方准确性、耐药性预测和剂量优化来提高asp效率的有前途的工具。本系统综述评估了人工智能驱动的asp的应用,重点关注其方法、结果和挑战。我们搜索了PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Embase的所有数据库,使用与“人工智能”和“抗生素”相关的关键词。我们只纳入了在ASP中使用AI和ML算法的研究,主要标准是经验性抗生素选择、剂量调整和ASP依从性。在时间、背景和语言上都没有限制。两位作者独立筛选纳入的研究,并使用观察性研究的纽卡斯尔渥太华量表(NOS)评估工具评估其偏倚风险。实施研究强调了人工智能在改善抗菌药物管理规划方面的潜力。两项研究表明,逻辑回归、增强树模型和梯度增强机可以有效地描述需要改变抗生素治疗方案的患者和不需要改变抗生素治疗方案的患者之间的差异。24项研究证实了机器学习在优化经验性抗生素选择、预测耐药性和提高治疗适宜性方面的作用,所有这些都有可能降低死亡率。此外,机器学习算法在优化抗生素剂量,特别是万古霉素方面显示出前景。这篇系统综述旨在强调各种人工智能模型、它们在asp中的应用,以及由此产生的对医疗保健结果的影响。机器学习和人工智能模型通过优化患者干预、经验性抗生素选择、耐药性预测和给药,有效地加强了抗生素管理。然而,它巧妙地引起了人们对高收入国家(HICs)与低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)之间差异的关注,强调了中低收入国家面临的结构性困难,同时也强调了高收入国家取得的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial intelligence-driven approaches in antibiotic stewardship programs and optimizing prescription practices: A systematic review
Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are essential in optimizing the use of antibiotics to address the global concern of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as promising tools for enhancing ASPs efficiency by improving antibiotic prescription accuracy, resistance prediction, and dosage optimization. This systematic review evaluated the application of AI-driven ASPs, focusing on their methodologies, outcomes, and challenges. We searched all of the databases in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase using keywords related to “AI” and “antibiotic.” We only included studies that used AI and ML algorithms in ASPs, with the main criteria being empirical antibiotic selection, dose adjustment, and ASP adherence. There were no limits on time, setting, or language. Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion and assessed their risk of bias using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) Assessment tool for observational studies. Implementation studies underscored AI's potential for improving antimicrobial stewardship programs. Two studies showed that logistic regression, boosted-tree models, and gradient-boosting machines could effectively describe the difference between patients who needed to change their antibiotic regimen and those who did not. Twenty-four studies have confirmed the role of machine learning in optimizing empirical antibiotic selection, predicting resistance, and enhancing therapy appropriateness, all of which have the potential to reduce mortality rates. Additionally, machine learning algorithms showed promise in optimizing antibiotic dosing, particularly for vancomycin. This systematic review aimed to highlight various AI models, their applications in ASPs, and the resulting impact on healthcare outcomes. Machine learning and AI models effectively enhance antibiotic stewardship by optimizing patient interventions, empirical antibiotic selection, resistance prediction, and dosing. However, it subtly draws attention to the differences between high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), highlighting the structural difficulties that LMICs confront while simultaneously highlighting the progress made in HICs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.70%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence in Medicine publishes original articles from a wide variety of interdisciplinary perspectives concerning the theory and practice of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine, medically-oriented human biology, and health care. Artificial intelligence in medicine may be characterized as the scientific discipline pertaining to research studies, projects, and applications that aim at supporting decision-based medical tasks through knowledge- and/or data-intensive computer-based solutions that ultimately support and improve the performance of a human care provider.
期刊最新文献
ORBIT: Oncogenic Representation Learning via Bi-Prototype Contrastive Learning in Hyperbolic Space for cancer driver gene identification Prior-guided multi-expert consensus fusion for multi-center thyroid nodule classification The application of artificial intelligence in healthcare practice: A mapping review of systematic reviews Rehabilitation movement simulation via joint angle-based generative AI PRESTIGE: Prevalence estimation for interactive guesstimates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1