人工智能伦理与自由主义2.0:迈向“数字权利法案”

Manuel Wörsdörfer
{"title":"人工智能伦理与自由主义2.0:迈向“数字权利法案”","authors":"Manuel Wörsdörfer","doi":"10.1007/s43681-023-00367-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article analyzes AI ethics from a distinct business ethics perspective, i.e., ‘ordoliberalism 2.0.’ It argues that the ongoing discourse on (generative) AI relies too much on corporate self-regulation and voluntary codes of conduct and thus lacks adequate governance mechanisms. To address these issues, the paper suggests not only introducing hard-law legislation with a more effective oversight structure but also merging already existing AI guidelines with an ordoliberal-inspired regulatory and competition policy. However, this link between AI ethics, regulation, and antitrust is not yet adequately discussed in the academic literature and beyond. The paper thus closes a significant gap in the academic literature and adds to the predominantly legal-political and philosophical discourse on AI governance. The paper’s research questions and goals are twofold: first, it identifies ordoliberal-inspired AI ethics principles that could serve as the foundation for a ‘digital bill of rights.’ Second, it shows how those principles could be implemented at the macro level with the help of ordoliberal competition and regulatory policy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 1","pages":"507 - 525"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI ethics and ordoliberalism 2.0: towards a ‘Digital Bill of Rights’\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Wörsdörfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43681-023-00367-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article analyzes AI ethics from a distinct business ethics perspective, i.e., ‘ordoliberalism 2.0.’ It argues that the ongoing discourse on (generative) AI relies too much on corporate self-regulation and voluntary codes of conduct and thus lacks adequate governance mechanisms. To address these issues, the paper suggests not only introducing hard-law legislation with a more effective oversight structure but also merging already existing AI guidelines with an ordoliberal-inspired regulatory and competition policy. However, this link between AI ethics, regulation, and antitrust is not yet adequately discussed in the academic literature and beyond. The paper thus closes a significant gap in the academic literature and adds to the predominantly legal-political and philosophical discourse on AI governance. The paper’s research questions and goals are twofold: first, it identifies ordoliberal-inspired AI ethics principles that could serve as the foundation for a ‘digital bill of rights.’ Second, it shows how those principles could be implemented at the macro level with the help of ordoliberal competition and regulatory policy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AI and ethics\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"507 - 525\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AI and ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-023-00367-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-023-00367-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从一个独特的商业伦理角度,即“世界自由主义2.0”来分析人工智能伦理。报告认为,目前关于(生成式)人工智能的讨论过于依赖企业自律和自愿行为准则,因此缺乏适当的治理机制。为了解决这些问题,该论文建议,不仅要引入具有更有效监督结构的硬法立法,还要将现有的人工智能指导方针与自由主义激励的监管和竞争政策相结合。然而,人工智能伦理、监管和反垄断之间的这种联系尚未在学术文献和其他文献中得到充分讨论。因此,这篇论文填补了学术文献中的一个重大空白,并增加了关于人工智能治理的主要法律-政治和哲学话语。该论文的研究问题和目标是双重的:首先,它确定了受自由主义启发的人工智能伦理原则,这些原则可以作为“数字权利法案”的基础。其次,它展示了如何在自由竞争和监管政策的帮助下,在宏观层面上实施这些原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AI ethics and ordoliberalism 2.0: towards a ‘Digital Bill of Rights’

This article analyzes AI ethics from a distinct business ethics perspective, i.e., ‘ordoliberalism 2.0.’ It argues that the ongoing discourse on (generative) AI relies too much on corporate self-regulation and voluntary codes of conduct and thus lacks adequate governance mechanisms. To address these issues, the paper suggests not only introducing hard-law legislation with a more effective oversight structure but also merging already existing AI guidelines with an ordoliberal-inspired regulatory and competition policy. However, this link between AI ethics, regulation, and antitrust is not yet adequately discussed in the academic literature and beyond. The paper thus closes a significant gap in the academic literature and adds to the predominantly legal-political and philosophical discourse on AI governance. The paper’s research questions and goals are twofold: first, it identifies ordoliberal-inspired AI ethics principles that could serve as the foundation for a ‘digital bill of rights.’ Second, it shows how those principles could be implemented at the macro level with the help of ordoliberal competition and regulatory policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Human-centred AI between well-being and flourishing: comparing governance and political discourse in the EU, Russia, India, and BRICS Authorised Interruption Capability in AI-intensive organisations The ethics of algorithmic management: critical AI literacy and the obligations owed to workers Justifying and evaluating automation: a general method for quantifying the impacts of machine learning on human flourishing Towards culturally-appropriate AI for health in the majority world: insights from participatory work in Latin America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1