探讨护士的关怀模式及其与弹性的关系:多层次情境效应模型

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Nursing Management Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1155/jonm/9518080
Noushin Mousazadeh, Faezeh Babaieasl, Maysam Rezapour, Hamideh Hakimi
{"title":"探讨护士的关怀模式及其与弹性的关系:多层次情境效应模型","authors":"Noushin Mousazadeh,&nbsp;Faezeh Babaieasl,&nbsp;Maysam Rezapour,&nbsp;Hamideh Hakimi","doi":"10.1155/jonm/9518080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Compassionate care and resilience play crucial roles in enhancing care quality. Understanding compassionate care patterns in the nursing population and their relationship with resilience can improve knowledge of these concepts.</p>\n <p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate compassionate care patterns among Iranian nurses and their associations with resilience at individual and contextual levels.</p>\n <p><b>Method:</b> This cross-sectional study used Persian versions of the 28-item Compassionate Care Questionnaire (CCQ) and Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). 478 Iranian nurses from 19 wards across 16 hospitals in northern Iran participated between February and September 2023. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was performed on compassionate care dimensions. Multilevel logistic regression modeling explored associations between resilience dimensions and compassionate care profiles, adjusting for control variables at individual and contextual levels.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> LPA revealed two distinct compassionate care profiles: “Low Compassionate Care” (16.3%) and “High Compassionate Care” (83.7%). After adjusting for control variables, personal competence (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02–1.15), positive acceptance (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06–1.44), and spirituality (OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01–1.38) were associated with higher odds of inclusion in the “High Compassionate Care” profile. The empty model showed that 6.5% of compassionate care patterns were explained at the ward level. After adding predictors at individual and ward levels, explained variances were reduced to 1.5% and &lt; 0.01%, respectively.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions and Implication:</b> This study offers insights into compassionate care among nurses, showing that few exhibited “Low Compassionate Care.” Higher resilience was positively linked to elevated compassionate care levels. Policymakers, managers, and educators can leverage these findings to enhance nursing management and support systems by prioritizing resilience-building strategies, ultimately improving patient care quality.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jonm/9518080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Compassionate Care Patterns Among Nurses and Its Associations With Resilience: Multilevel Contextual Effects Modeling\",\"authors\":\"Noushin Mousazadeh,&nbsp;Faezeh Babaieasl,&nbsp;Maysam Rezapour,&nbsp;Hamideh Hakimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/jonm/9518080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Background:</b> Compassionate care and resilience play crucial roles in enhancing care quality. Understanding compassionate care patterns in the nursing population and their relationship with resilience can improve knowledge of these concepts.</p>\\n <p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate compassionate care patterns among Iranian nurses and their associations with resilience at individual and contextual levels.</p>\\n <p><b>Method:</b> This cross-sectional study used Persian versions of the 28-item Compassionate Care Questionnaire (CCQ) and Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). 478 Iranian nurses from 19 wards across 16 hospitals in northern Iran participated between February and September 2023. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was performed on compassionate care dimensions. Multilevel logistic regression modeling explored associations between resilience dimensions and compassionate care profiles, adjusting for control variables at individual and contextual levels.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> LPA revealed two distinct compassionate care profiles: “Low Compassionate Care” (16.3%) and “High Compassionate Care” (83.7%). After adjusting for control variables, personal competence (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02–1.15), positive acceptance (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06–1.44), and spirituality (OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01–1.38) were associated with higher odds of inclusion in the “High Compassionate Care” profile. The empty model showed that 6.5% of compassionate care patterns were explained at the ward level. After adding predictors at individual and ward levels, explained variances were reduced to 1.5% and &lt; 0.01%, respectively.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusions and Implication:</b> This study offers insights into compassionate care among nurses, showing that few exhibited “Low Compassionate Care.” Higher resilience was positively linked to elevated compassionate care levels. Policymakers, managers, and educators can leverage these findings to enhance nursing management and support systems by prioritizing resilience-building strategies, ultimately improving patient care quality.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Management\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jonm/9518080\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/9518080\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/9518080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:同情关怀和弹性在提高护理质量中起着至关重要的作用。了解护理人群中的同情护理模式及其与恢复力的关系可以提高对这些概念的认识。目的:调查伊朗护士的同情心护理模式及其在个人和环境层面上与心理弹性的关系。方法:本横断面研究采用波斯语版本的28项体恤关怀问卷(CCQ)和康诺-戴维森弹性量表(CD-RISC)。2023年2月至9月期间,来自伊朗北部16家医院19个病房的478名伊朗护士参与了该项目。对关爱维度进行潜在特征分析(LPA)。多水平逻辑回归模型探讨了弹性维度和同情护理概况之间的关联,调整了个人和环境水平的控制变量。结果:LPA显示出两种不同的关怀特征:低关怀(16.3%)和高关怀(83.7%)。在调整控制变量后,个人能力(OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.15)、积极接受(OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06-1.44)和灵性(OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01-1.38)与纳入“高同情心护理”的几率较高相关。空模型显示,6.5%的关爱模式在病房层面得到了解释。在个体和病房水平添加预测因子后,可解释的方差降至1.5%和<;0.01%,分别。结论与启示:本研究对护士的同情心关怀提供了一些见解,显示很少有护士表现出“低同情心关怀”。更高的恢复力与更高的同情心护理水平呈正相关。政策制定者、管理者和教育工作者可以利用这些发现,通过优先考虑恢复力建设战略来加强护理管理和支持系统,最终提高患者护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring Compassionate Care Patterns Among Nurses and Its Associations With Resilience: Multilevel Contextual Effects Modeling

Background: Compassionate care and resilience play crucial roles in enhancing care quality. Understanding compassionate care patterns in the nursing population and their relationship with resilience can improve knowledge of these concepts.

Objective: To investigate compassionate care patterns among Iranian nurses and their associations with resilience at individual and contextual levels.

Method: This cross-sectional study used Persian versions of the 28-item Compassionate Care Questionnaire (CCQ) and Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). 478 Iranian nurses from 19 wards across 16 hospitals in northern Iran participated between February and September 2023. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was performed on compassionate care dimensions. Multilevel logistic regression modeling explored associations between resilience dimensions and compassionate care profiles, adjusting for control variables at individual and contextual levels.

Results: LPA revealed two distinct compassionate care profiles: “Low Compassionate Care” (16.3%) and “High Compassionate Care” (83.7%). After adjusting for control variables, personal competence (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02–1.15), positive acceptance (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06–1.44), and spirituality (OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01–1.38) were associated with higher odds of inclusion in the “High Compassionate Care” profile. The empty model showed that 6.5% of compassionate care patterns were explained at the ward level. After adding predictors at individual and ward levels, explained variances were reduced to 1.5% and < 0.01%, respectively.

Conclusions and Implication: This study offers insights into compassionate care among nurses, showing that few exhibited “Low Compassionate Care.” Higher resilience was positively linked to elevated compassionate care levels. Policymakers, managers, and educators can leverage these findings to enhance nursing management and support systems by prioritizing resilience-building strategies, ultimately improving patient care quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
期刊最新文献
How Does the Absence of Job Embeddedness Contribute to Nurses’ Turnover Intention? A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Longitudinal Interplay Between Team Resilience and Team Stress in Low-Stability Clinical Nursing Teams: A Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analysis Association Between Shift Patterns and Occupational Stress and Perceived Professional Benefits Among Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study Correction to “Association Between Psychological Empowerment and Work Engagement Among Rural Nurses: A Latent Profile and Moderation Analysis” Collaborative Networks in Critical Care Nursing Teams: Based on Social Network Analysis and Multiple Regression Quadratic Assignment Procedure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1