从COVID-19男性和女性恢复后,心脏压力反射得以保留

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Clinical Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1111/jch.70006
Roberto Souza, Beatriz Divino, Helena N. M. Rocha, Jocemir R. Lugon, Natalia G. Rocha, Antonio C. L. Nobrega, Eliza Prodel
{"title":"从COVID-19男性和女性恢复后,心脏压力反射得以保留","authors":"Roberto Souza,&nbsp;Beatriz Divino,&nbsp;Helena N. M. Rocha,&nbsp;Jocemir R. Lugon,&nbsp;Natalia G. Rocha,&nbsp;Antonio C. L. Nobrega,&nbsp;Eliza Prodel","doi":"10.1111/jch.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We sought to investigate whether mild COVID-19 impairs cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (cBRS), using the modified Oxford protocol, in young healthy men and women 12–14 weeks after recovering from the infection. Participants were distributed into two groups: Non-COVID-19 group (NCG: men <i>n</i> = 6 [30 ± 3years; 26 ± 1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>] and women <i>n</i> = 5 [25 ± 1 years; 25 ± 1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>]) and recovered from COVID-19 group (RCG: men <i>n</i> = 6 [29 ± 3 years; 25 ± 1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>] and women <i>n</i> = 10 [32 ± 4 years; 22 ± 1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>]), the RCG tested positive (RT-PCR) 12 to 14 weeks before the protocol. Beat-to-beat finger blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured during a bolus of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and phenylephrine (PHE), in a control condition and during cold pressor test (CPT) and moderate dynamic handgrip exercise (GRIP). Resting systolic BP was higher in the RCG (135 ± 14 mmHg vs. 122 ± 12 mmHg, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Both CPT and GRIP maneuvers increased HR and BP; the bolus of SNP diminished BP and evoked a reflex-mediated increase in HR; PHE increased BP, resulting in a reflex-mediated decrease in HR. Of note, cBRS for decrease or increase of BP did not differ between groups under the studied conditions: control (SNP, <i>p</i> = 0.39; PHE, <i>p</i> = 0.50); CPT (SNP, <i>p</i> = 0.09; PHE: <i>p</i> = 0.82); and GRIP (SNP, <i>p</i> = 0.35; PHE, <i>p</i> = 0.53). In conclusion, mild COVID-19 did not seem to impair cBRS in healthy young men and women 12–14 weeks after recovering from the infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac Baroreflex Is Preserved After the Recovery From COVID-19 Men and Women\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Souza,&nbsp;Beatriz Divino,&nbsp;Helena N. M. Rocha,&nbsp;Jocemir R. Lugon,&nbsp;Natalia G. Rocha,&nbsp;Antonio C. L. Nobrega,&nbsp;Eliza Prodel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We sought to investigate whether mild COVID-19 impairs cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (cBRS), using the modified Oxford protocol, in young healthy men and women 12–14 weeks after recovering from the infection. Participants were distributed into two groups: Non-COVID-19 group (NCG: men <i>n</i> = 6 [30 ± 3years; 26 ± 1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>] and women <i>n</i> = 5 [25 ± 1 years; 25 ± 1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>]) and recovered from COVID-19 group (RCG: men <i>n</i> = 6 [29 ± 3 years; 25 ± 1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>] and women <i>n</i> = 10 [32 ± 4 years; 22 ± 1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>]), the RCG tested positive (RT-PCR) 12 to 14 weeks before the protocol. Beat-to-beat finger blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured during a bolus of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and phenylephrine (PHE), in a control condition and during cold pressor test (CPT) and moderate dynamic handgrip exercise (GRIP). Resting systolic BP was higher in the RCG (135 ± 14 mmHg vs. 122 ± 12 mmHg, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Both CPT and GRIP maneuvers increased HR and BP; the bolus of SNP diminished BP and evoked a reflex-mediated increase in HR; PHE increased BP, resulting in a reflex-mediated decrease in HR. Of note, cBRS for decrease or increase of BP did not differ between groups under the studied conditions: control (SNP, <i>p</i> = 0.39; PHE, <i>p</i> = 0.50); CPT (SNP, <i>p</i> = 0.09; PHE: <i>p</i> = 0.82); and GRIP (SNP, <i>p</i> = 0.35; PHE, <i>p</i> = 0.53). In conclusion, mild COVID-19 did not seem to impair cBRS in healthy young men and women 12–14 weeks after recovering from the infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们试图在感染恢复后12-14周的年轻健康男性和女性中,使用改进的牛津方案,调查轻度COVID-19是否会损害心脏压力反射敏感性(cBRS)。参与者分为两组:非covid -19组(NCG:男性n = 6[30±3岁;26±1 kg/m2],女性n = 5[25±1岁];25±1 kg/m2]),并从COVID-19组中恢复(RCG:男性n = 6[29±3年;25±1 kg/m2],女性n = 10[32±4岁];22±1 kg/m2]),治疗前12 ~ 14周RCG检测呈阳性(RT-PCR)。在对照条件下、冷压试验(CPT)和适度动态握力运动(GRIP)期间,分别测量硝普钠(SNP)和苯肾上腺素(PHE)注射期间手指搏动血压(BP)和心率(HR)。RCG组静息收缩压较高(135±14 mmHg vs 122±12 mmHg, p = 0.01)。CPT和GRIP动作均增加心率和血压;SNP的加入降低了血压并引起了反射性的HR升高;PHE增加血压,导致反射介导的HR降低。值得注意的是,在研究条件下,各组之间血压升高或降低的cBRS没有差异:对照组(SNP, p = 0.39;PHE, p = 0.50);CPT (SNP, p = 0.09;PHE: p = 0.82);GRIP (SNP, p = 0.35;PHE, p = 0.53)。总之,在感染康复后12-14周的健康年轻男性和女性中,轻度COVID-19似乎没有损害cBRS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cardiac Baroreflex Is Preserved After the Recovery From COVID-19 Men and Women

We sought to investigate whether mild COVID-19 impairs cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (cBRS), using the modified Oxford protocol, in young healthy men and women 12–14 weeks after recovering from the infection. Participants were distributed into two groups: Non-COVID-19 group (NCG: men n = 6 [30 ± 3years; 26 ± 1 kg/m2] and women n = 5 [25 ± 1 years; 25 ± 1 kg/m2]) and recovered from COVID-19 group (RCG: men n = 6 [29 ± 3 years; 25 ± 1 kg/m2] and women n = 10 [32 ± 4 years; 22 ± 1 kg/m2]), the RCG tested positive (RT-PCR) 12 to 14 weeks before the protocol. Beat-to-beat finger blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured during a bolus of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and phenylephrine (PHE), in a control condition and during cold pressor test (CPT) and moderate dynamic handgrip exercise (GRIP). Resting systolic BP was higher in the RCG (135 ± 14 mmHg vs. 122 ± 12 mmHg, p = 0.01). Both CPT and GRIP maneuvers increased HR and BP; the bolus of SNP diminished BP and evoked a reflex-mediated increase in HR; PHE increased BP, resulting in a reflex-mediated decrease in HR. Of note, cBRS for decrease or increase of BP did not differ between groups under the studied conditions: control (SNP, p = 0.39; PHE, p = 0.50); CPT (SNP, p = 0.09; PHE: p = 0.82); and GRIP (SNP, p = 0.35; PHE, p = 0.53). In conclusion, mild COVID-19 did not seem to impair cBRS in healthy young men and women 12–14 weeks after recovering from the infection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
期刊最新文献
Trends in Central Obesity Prevalence Among Adults With Hypertension in the United States, 2001–2023 Correction to “Deep Gray Matters Iron Deposition Is Positively Associated With White Matter Hyperintensity in Hypertension” Trends in Antihypertensive Medication Use and Blood Pressure Control in Adults Aged 66–79: Results of the National Examination Surveys DEGS1 and Study on Health of Older People Gesundheit 65+ Willingness to Pay for Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring in People With Prehypertension Association Between Obesity Status and Hypertension Phenotypes: Are Inflammatory Indicators the Missing Link? Evidence From a Large Population Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1