头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦对中国产esbl肠杆菌的体外活性:SMART 2016-2019 CE等级信息为2T。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of global antimicrobial resistance Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jgar.2025.02.001
Wei Yu , Hui Zhang , Yingchun Xu , Ying Zhu , Peiyao Jia , Yue Kang , Qiwen Yang
{"title":"头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦对中国产esbl肠杆菌的体外活性:SMART 2016-2019 CE等级信息为2T。","authors":"Wei Yu ,&nbsp;Hui Zhang ,&nbsp;Yingchun Xu ,&nbsp;Ying Zhu ,&nbsp;Peiyao Jia ,&nbsp;Yue Kang ,&nbsp;Qiwen Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.jgar.2025.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the in vitro susceptibility of ESBL-producing <em>Enterobacterales</em> isolates to ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), a combination of tazobactam (a ß-lactamase inhibitor) and a new antipseudomonal cephalosporin.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From 2016 to 2019, susceptibilities of 10,545 <em>Enterobacterales</em> isolated from intra-abdominal, urinary tract, respiratory tract and bloodstream infections to C/T and 11 other antimicrobial agents were analyzed. Non-ESBL-producing isolates were included for comparative analysis to provide a comprehensive susceptibility profile.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 10,545 isolated <em>Enterobacterales</em>, 54.6% were ESBL producers. The ESBL-positive rates for <em>E. coli</em> (4984/10,545, 47.3%) and <em>K. pneumoniae</em> (3606/10,545, 34.2%) were 59.8% and 51.1%, respectively. The susceptibility rate to C/T for all <em>Enterobacterales</em> was 79.5%. For <em>E. coli</em> and <em>K. pneumoniae</em>, the C/T susceptibilities were 89.3% and 68.0%, respectively. For non-ESBL-producing <em>Enterobacterales</em>, susceptibility to C/T was 99.5%. The susceptibility of non-carbapenem-resistant (CR) ESBL-producing <em>Enterobacterales</em> to C/T was 81.0%. The isolation rates of ESBL-positive and carbapenem-resistant <em>Enterobacterales</em> (CRE), CR-<em>E. coli</em>, and CR-<em>K. pneumoniae</em> were 14.3%, 5.6% and 26.8%, respectively. The susceptibility of ESBL-positive CREs to C/T was &lt;20% for most antimicrobials except amikacin (50.4%). The susceptibility of ESBL-positive CR-<em>E. coli</em> to C/T was 28.2. For ESBL-producing CR-<em>K. pneumoniae</em>, susceptibility to most antimicrobials was &lt;10%, except for amikacin (37.4%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The present research underscores the viability of C/T as an alternative to carbapenems for the treatment of ESBL-producing, carbapenem susceptible <em>Enterobacterales</em>. However, the susceptibilities of ESBL-positive CRE to C/T and other studied antimicrobials were consistently below 20%, emphasizing for new innovative treatment strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 161-166"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against ESBL-producing enterobacterales in China: SMART 2016–2019\",\"authors\":\"Wei Yu ,&nbsp;Hui Zhang ,&nbsp;Yingchun Xu ,&nbsp;Ying Zhu ,&nbsp;Peiyao Jia ,&nbsp;Yue Kang ,&nbsp;Qiwen Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jgar.2025.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the in vitro susceptibility of ESBL-producing <em>Enterobacterales</em> isolates to ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), a combination of tazobactam (a ß-lactamase inhibitor) and a new antipseudomonal cephalosporin.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From 2016 to 2019, susceptibilities of 10,545 <em>Enterobacterales</em> isolated from intra-abdominal, urinary tract, respiratory tract and bloodstream infections to C/T and 11 other antimicrobial agents were analyzed. Non-ESBL-producing isolates were included for comparative analysis to provide a comprehensive susceptibility profile.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 10,545 isolated <em>Enterobacterales</em>, 54.6% were ESBL producers. The ESBL-positive rates for <em>E. coli</em> (4984/10,545, 47.3%) and <em>K. pneumoniae</em> (3606/10,545, 34.2%) were 59.8% and 51.1%, respectively. The susceptibility rate to C/T for all <em>Enterobacterales</em> was 79.5%. For <em>E. coli</em> and <em>K. pneumoniae</em>, the C/T susceptibilities were 89.3% and 68.0%, respectively. For non-ESBL-producing <em>Enterobacterales</em>, susceptibility to C/T was 99.5%. The susceptibility of non-carbapenem-resistant (CR) ESBL-producing <em>Enterobacterales</em> to C/T was 81.0%. The isolation rates of ESBL-positive and carbapenem-resistant <em>Enterobacterales</em> (CRE), CR-<em>E. coli</em>, and CR-<em>K. pneumoniae</em> were 14.3%, 5.6% and 26.8%, respectively. The susceptibility of ESBL-positive CREs to C/T was &lt;20% for most antimicrobials except amikacin (50.4%). The susceptibility of ESBL-positive CR-<em>E. coli</em> to C/T was 28.2. For ESBL-producing CR-<em>K. pneumoniae</em>, susceptibility to most antimicrobials was &lt;10%, except for amikacin (37.4%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The present research underscores the viability of C/T as an alternative to carbapenems for the treatment of ESBL-producing, carbapenem susceptible <em>Enterobacterales</em>. However, the susceptibilities of ESBL-positive CRE to C/T and other studied antimicrobials were consistently below 20%, emphasizing for new innovative treatment strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 161-166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716525000359\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716525000359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价产esbl肠杆菌分离株对头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦(C/T)、他唑巴坦(ß-内酰胺酶抑制剂)与新型抗假单胞菌头孢菌素联合用药的体外敏感性。方法:分析2016 - 2019年腹腔、尿路、呼吸道和血流感染分离的10545株肠杆菌对C/T及其他11种抗菌药物的敏感性。不产生esbl的分离株被纳入比较分析,以提供全面的敏感性谱。结果:10545株分离肠杆菌中,产生ESBL的占54.6%;大肠杆菌(984/ 10545,47.3%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(3606 / 10545,34.2%)esbl阳性率分别为59.8%和51.1%。所有肠杆菌对C/T的敏感性为79.5%。大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的C/T敏感性分别为89.3%和68.0%。对于不产生esbl的肠杆菌,对C/T的敏感性为99.5%。非碳青霉烯抗性(CR)产esbl肠杆菌对C/T的敏感性为81.0%。esbl阳性肠杆菌和耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)、CR-E。大肠杆菌和CR-K。肺炎分别为14.3%、5.6%和26.8%。esbl阳性cre对C/T的敏感性除阿米卡星(50.4%)外,大多数抗菌素的敏感性< 20%。esbl阳性CR-E的敏感性。大肠杆菌对C/T的比值为28.2。产生esbl的CR-K。肺炎类,除阿米卡星(37.4%)外,其余抗菌药物的敏感性均< 10%。结论:目前的研究强调了C/T作为碳青霉烯类药物治疗产esbl的碳青霉烯类敏感肠杆菌的可行性。然而,esbl阳性CRE对C/T和其他研究的抗微生物药物的敏感性始终低于20%,强调新的创新治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against ESBL-producing enterobacterales in China: SMART 2016–2019

Objectives

To evaluate the in vitro susceptibility of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales isolates to ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), a combination of tazobactam (a ß-lactamase inhibitor) and a new antipseudomonal cephalosporin.

Methods

From 2016 to 2019, susceptibilities of 10,545 Enterobacterales isolated from intra-abdominal, urinary tract, respiratory tract and bloodstream infections to C/T and 11 other antimicrobial agents were analyzed. Non-ESBL-producing isolates were included for comparative analysis to provide a comprehensive susceptibility profile.

Results

Among 10,545 isolated Enterobacterales, 54.6% were ESBL producers. The ESBL-positive rates for E. coli (4984/10,545, 47.3%) and K. pneumoniae (3606/10,545, 34.2%) were 59.8% and 51.1%, respectively. The susceptibility rate to C/T for all Enterobacterales was 79.5%. For E. coli and K. pneumoniae, the C/T susceptibilities were 89.3% and 68.0%, respectively. For non-ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, susceptibility to C/T was 99.5%. The susceptibility of non-carbapenem-resistant (CR) ESBL-producing Enterobacterales to C/T was 81.0%. The isolation rates of ESBL-positive and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), CR-E. coli, and CR-K. pneumoniae were 14.3%, 5.6% and 26.8%, respectively. The susceptibility of ESBL-positive CREs to C/T was <20% for most antimicrobials except amikacin (50.4%). The susceptibility of ESBL-positive CR-E. coli to C/T was 28.2. For ESBL-producing CR-K. pneumoniae, susceptibility to most antimicrobials was <10%, except for amikacin (37.4%).

Conclusions

The present research underscores the viability of C/T as an alternative to carbapenems for the treatment of ESBL-producing, carbapenem susceptible Enterobacterales. However, the susceptibilities of ESBL-positive CRE to C/T and other studied antimicrobials were consistently below 20%, emphasizing for new innovative treatment strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of global antimicrobial resistance
Journal of global antimicrobial resistance INFECTIOUS DISEASES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance (JGAR) is a quarterly online journal run by an international Editorial Board that focuses on the global spread of antibiotic-resistant microbes. JGAR is a dedicated journal for all professionals working in research, health care, the environment and animal infection control, aiming to track the resistance threat worldwide and provides a single voice devoted to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Featuring peer-reviewed and up to date research articles, reviews, short notes and hot topics JGAR covers the key topics related to antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and antiparasitic resistance.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of Clostridioides difficile RT027/ST1 and RT017/ST37 mixed infection in a rare case Model-Informed Dosing Optimization of Colistin Sulfate in Critically Ill Patients With and Without Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Impact of fluconazole non-susceptibility on 30-day mortality in Candida tropicalis invasive candidiasis: Insights from a region with low resistance prevalence. Molecular epidemiology and evolutionary analysis of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii SToxf2499 clone at a tertiary hospital in Tianjin, China. Time-series analysis of antimicrobial use and resistance trends in a tertiary hospital in China from 2017 to 2022: Implications for national stewardship efforts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1