肠道、宫颈和阴道微生物群与宫颈癌的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Women's Health Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1186/s12905-025-03599-1
Qin Wen, Shubin Wang, Yalan Min, Xinyi Liu, Jian Fang, Jinyi Lang, Meihua Chen
{"title":"肠道、宫颈和阴道微生物群与宫颈癌的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Qin Wen, Shubin Wang, Yalan Min, Xinyi Liu, Jian Fang, Jinyi Lang, Meihua Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03599-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increasing number of studies indicate that the gut, cervical, and vaginal microbiota may play crucial roles in the development of cervical cancer (CC). However, the interactions between the microbiota and the host are yet unknown. To address this gap, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the microbiota alterations in a variety of body locations, including the gut and genital tract.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were conducted to retrieve eligible papers published from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2024 (PROSPERO: CRD42024554433). This study was restricted to English-language studies reporting on alpha diversity, beta diversity, and relative abundance, as well as on patients with CC whose microbiota had been analyzed via next-generation sequencing technologies. To assess the risk of bias (RoB), we utilized the Newcastle‒Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) and the ROBINS-I tool. For the meta-analysis, we employed Review Manager 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six eligible studies were included in this review. The Chao1 index (SMD = 0.96, [95% CI: 0.71, 1.21], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and the Shannon index (SMD = 1.02, [95% CI: 0.53, 1.50], I<sup>2</sup> = 85%) values from vaginal samples were significantly greater in patients than in the controls. In the cervical samples, the Shannon index value (SMD = 1.29, [95% CI: 0.61, 1.97], I<sup>2</sup> = 93%) significantly increased, whereas the Chao1 index value did not significantly differ (SMD = 0.50, [95% CI: -0.46, 1.46], I<sup>2</sup> = 89%). The Shannon index value (SMD = 0.25, [95% CI: -0.22, 0.72], I<sup>2</sup> = 38%) did not significantly differ across the gut samples. The majority of studies (19/25) indicated that the patients and noncancer controls differed significantly in terms of beta diversity. Cancer-associated changes were observed, with a dramatic decrease in the Lactobacillus genus and significant increases in pathogenic bacteria, including the Anaerococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Porphyromonas, Prevotella, and Sneathia genera. Additionally, the impact of antineoplastic therapies on microbial diversity was inconsistently reported across several studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review elucidates the microbiota alterations associated with the prevalence of CC and its response to anti-tumor therapies, aiming to provide insights for future research directions and precision medicine strategies to enhance women's quality of life.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>CRD42024554433.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations of the gut, cervical, and vaginal microbiota with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Qin Wen, Shubin Wang, Yalan Min, Xinyi Liu, Jian Fang, Jinyi Lang, Meihua Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12905-025-03599-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increasing number of studies indicate that the gut, cervical, and vaginal microbiota may play crucial roles in the development of cervical cancer (CC). However, the interactions between the microbiota and the host are yet unknown. To address this gap, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the microbiota alterations in a variety of body locations, including the gut and genital tract.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were conducted to retrieve eligible papers published from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2024 (PROSPERO: CRD42024554433). This study was restricted to English-language studies reporting on alpha diversity, beta diversity, and relative abundance, as well as on patients with CC whose microbiota had been analyzed via next-generation sequencing technologies. To assess the risk of bias (RoB), we utilized the Newcastle‒Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) and the ROBINS-I tool. For the meta-analysis, we employed Review Manager 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six eligible studies were included in this review. The Chao1 index (SMD = 0.96, [95% CI: 0.71, 1.21], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and the Shannon index (SMD = 1.02, [95% CI: 0.53, 1.50], I<sup>2</sup> = 85%) values from vaginal samples were significantly greater in patients than in the controls. In the cervical samples, the Shannon index value (SMD = 1.29, [95% CI: 0.61, 1.97], I<sup>2</sup> = 93%) significantly increased, whereas the Chao1 index value did not significantly differ (SMD = 0.50, [95% CI: -0.46, 1.46], I<sup>2</sup> = 89%). The Shannon index value (SMD = 0.25, [95% CI: -0.22, 0.72], I<sup>2</sup> = 38%) did not significantly differ across the gut samples. The majority of studies (19/25) indicated that the patients and noncancer controls differed significantly in terms of beta diversity. Cancer-associated changes were observed, with a dramatic decrease in the Lactobacillus genus and significant increases in pathogenic bacteria, including the Anaerococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Porphyromonas, Prevotella, and Sneathia genera. Additionally, the impact of antineoplastic therapies on microbial diversity was inconsistently reported across several studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review elucidates the microbiota alterations associated with the prevalence of CC and its response to anti-tumor therapies, aiming to provide insights for future research directions and precision medicine strategies to enhance women's quality of life.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>CRD42024554433.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829412/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03599-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03599-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的研究表明,肠道、宫颈和阴道微生物群可能在宫颈癌(CC)的发展中起关键作用。然而,微生物群与宿主之间的相互作用尚不清楚。为了解决这一差距,进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估包括肠道和生殖道在内的各种身体部位的微生物群变化。方法:电子检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library,检索2014年1月1日至2024年1月1日发表的符合条件的论文(PROSPERO: CRD42024554433)。本研究仅限于报道α多样性、β多样性和相对丰度的英语研究,以及通过下一代测序技术分析微生物群的CC患者。为了评估偏倚风险(RoB),我们使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表(NOS)和ROBINS-I工具。对于meta分析,我们使用Review Manager 5.4。结果:本综述纳入了36项符合条件的研究。阴道样本的Chao1指数(SMD = 0.96, [95% CI: 0.71, 1.21], I2 = 0%)和Shannon指数(SMD = 1.02, [95% CI: 0.53, 1.50], I2 = 85%)值在患者中显著高于对照组。在子宫颈样本中,Shannon指数值(SMD = 1.29, [95% CI: 0.61, 1.97], I2 = 93%)显著升高,而Chao1指数值无显著差异(SMD = 0.50, [95% CI: -0.46, 1.46], I2 = 89%)。不同肠道样本的Shannon指数值(SMD = 0.25, [95% CI: -0.22, 0.72], I2 = 38%)无显著差异。大多数研究(19/25)表明,患者和非癌症对照者在β多样性方面存在显著差异。观察到与癌症相关的变化,乳酸杆菌属急剧减少,致病菌显著增加,包括无氧球菌、胃链球菌、卟啉单胞菌、普雷沃氏菌和Sneathia属。此外,抗肿瘤治疗对微生物多样性的影响在几项研究中报道不一致。结论:本系统综述阐明了微生物群变化与CC患病率及其对抗肿瘤治疗的反应相关,旨在为未来的研究方向和精准医学策略提供见解,以提高女性的生活质量。普洛斯彼罗注册:CRD42024554433。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associations of the gut, cervical, and vaginal microbiota with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: An increasing number of studies indicate that the gut, cervical, and vaginal microbiota may play crucial roles in the development of cervical cancer (CC). However, the interactions between the microbiota and the host are yet unknown. To address this gap, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the microbiota alterations in a variety of body locations, including the gut and genital tract.

Methods: Electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were conducted to retrieve eligible papers published from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2024 (PROSPERO: CRD42024554433). This study was restricted to English-language studies reporting on alpha diversity, beta diversity, and relative abundance, as well as on patients with CC whose microbiota had been analyzed via next-generation sequencing technologies. To assess the risk of bias (RoB), we utilized the Newcastle‒Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) and the ROBINS-I tool. For the meta-analysis, we employed Review Manager 5.4.

Results: Thirty-six eligible studies were included in this review. The Chao1 index (SMD = 0.96, [95% CI: 0.71, 1.21], I2 = 0%) and the Shannon index (SMD = 1.02, [95% CI: 0.53, 1.50], I2 = 85%) values from vaginal samples were significantly greater in patients than in the controls. In the cervical samples, the Shannon index value (SMD = 1.29, [95% CI: 0.61, 1.97], I2 = 93%) significantly increased, whereas the Chao1 index value did not significantly differ (SMD = 0.50, [95% CI: -0.46, 1.46], I2 = 89%). The Shannon index value (SMD = 0.25, [95% CI: -0.22, 0.72], I2 = 38%) did not significantly differ across the gut samples. The majority of studies (19/25) indicated that the patients and noncancer controls differed significantly in terms of beta diversity. Cancer-associated changes were observed, with a dramatic decrease in the Lactobacillus genus and significant increases in pathogenic bacteria, including the Anaerococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Porphyromonas, Prevotella, and Sneathia genera. Additionally, the impact of antineoplastic therapies on microbial diversity was inconsistently reported across several studies.

Conclusion: This systematic review elucidates the microbiota alterations associated with the prevalence of CC and its response to anti-tumor therapies, aiming to provide insights for future research directions and precision medicine strategies to enhance women's quality of life.

Prospero registration: CRD42024554433.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
期刊最新文献
A predictive model for recurrence after hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy: a combined analysis of clinical and ultrasound parameters. Combining transvaginal ultrasound radiomics with clinical-ultrasound semantic features for the identification of high-risk endometrial lesions. Predicting women's intention to use contraceptives in East Africa: a machine learning analysis of predictors. From mechanics to mobilization: a biomechanically-informed rehabilitation framework for cesarean-related scars. Association of vaginal dysbiosis with cervical lesions among women with non-16/18 high-risk HPV infections: a cross-sectional study of 2,264 women in Eastern China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1