{"title":"肠道、宫颈和阴道微生物群与宫颈癌的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Qin Wen, Shubin Wang, Yalan Min, Xinyi Liu, Jian Fang, Jinyi Lang, Meihua Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03599-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increasing number of studies indicate that the gut, cervical, and vaginal microbiota may play crucial roles in the development of cervical cancer (CC). However, the interactions between the microbiota and the host are yet unknown. To address this gap, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the microbiota alterations in a variety of body locations, including the gut and genital tract.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were conducted to retrieve eligible papers published from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2024 (PROSPERO: CRD42024554433). This study was restricted to English-language studies reporting on alpha diversity, beta diversity, and relative abundance, as well as on patients with CC whose microbiota had been analyzed via next-generation sequencing technologies. To assess the risk of bias (RoB), we utilized the Newcastle‒Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) and the ROBINS-I tool. For the meta-analysis, we employed Review Manager 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six eligible studies were included in this review. The Chao1 index (SMD = 0.96, [95% CI: 0.71, 1.21], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and the Shannon index (SMD = 1.02, [95% CI: 0.53, 1.50], I<sup>2</sup> = 85%) values from vaginal samples were significantly greater in patients than in the controls. In the cervical samples, the Shannon index value (SMD = 1.29, [95% CI: 0.61, 1.97], I<sup>2</sup> = 93%) significantly increased, whereas the Chao1 index value did not significantly differ (SMD = 0.50, [95% CI: -0.46, 1.46], I<sup>2</sup> = 89%). The Shannon index value (SMD = 0.25, [95% CI: -0.22, 0.72], I<sup>2</sup> = 38%) did not significantly differ across the gut samples. The majority of studies (19/25) indicated that the patients and noncancer controls differed significantly in terms of beta diversity. Cancer-associated changes were observed, with a dramatic decrease in the Lactobacillus genus and significant increases in pathogenic bacteria, including the Anaerococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Porphyromonas, Prevotella, and Sneathia genera. Additionally, the impact of antineoplastic therapies on microbial diversity was inconsistently reported across several studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review elucidates the microbiota alterations associated with the prevalence of CC and its response to anti-tumor therapies, aiming to provide insights for future research directions and precision medicine strategies to enhance women's quality of life.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>CRD42024554433.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations of the gut, cervical, and vaginal microbiota with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Qin Wen, Shubin Wang, Yalan Min, Xinyi Liu, Jian Fang, Jinyi Lang, Meihua Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12905-025-03599-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increasing number of studies indicate that the gut, cervical, and vaginal microbiota may play crucial roles in the development of cervical cancer (CC). However, the interactions between the microbiota and the host are yet unknown. To address this gap, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the microbiota alterations in a variety of body locations, including the gut and genital tract.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were conducted to retrieve eligible papers published from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2024 (PROSPERO: CRD42024554433). This study was restricted to English-language studies reporting on alpha diversity, beta diversity, and relative abundance, as well as on patients with CC whose microbiota had been analyzed via next-generation sequencing technologies. To assess the risk of bias (RoB), we utilized the Newcastle‒Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) and the ROBINS-I tool. For the meta-analysis, we employed Review Manager 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six eligible studies were included in this review. The Chao1 index (SMD = 0.96, [95% CI: 0.71, 1.21], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and the Shannon index (SMD = 1.02, [95% CI: 0.53, 1.50], I<sup>2</sup> = 85%) values from vaginal samples were significantly greater in patients than in the controls. In the cervical samples, the Shannon index value (SMD = 1.29, [95% CI: 0.61, 1.97], I<sup>2</sup> = 93%) significantly increased, whereas the Chao1 index value did not significantly differ (SMD = 0.50, [95% CI: -0.46, 1.46], I<sup>2</sup> = 89%). The Shannon index value (SMD = 0.25, [95% CI: -0.22, 0.72], I<sup>2</sup> = 38%) did not significantly differ across the gut samples. The majority of studies (19/25) indicated that the patients and noncancer controls differed significantly in terms of beta diversity. Cancer-associated changes were observed, with a dramatic decrease in the Lactobacillus genus and significant increases in pathogenic bacteria, including the Anaerococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Porphyromonas, Prevotella, and Sneathia genera. Additionally, the impact of antineoplastic therapies on microbial diversity was inconsistently reported across several studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review elucidates the microbiota alterations associated with the prevalence of CC and its response to anti-tumor therapies, aiming to provide insights for future research directions and precision medicine strategies to enhance women's quality of life.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>CRD42024554433.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829412/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03599-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03599-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Associations of the gut, cervical, and vaginal microbiota with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: An increasing number of studies indicate that the gut, cervical, and vaginal microbiota may play crucial roles in the development of cervical cancer (CC). However, the interactions between the microbiota and the host are yet unknown. To address this gap, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the microbiota alterations in a variety of body locations, including the gut and genital tract.
Methods: Electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were conducted to retrieve eligible papers published from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2024 (PROSPERO: CRD42024554433). This study was restricted to English-language studies reporting on alpha diversity, beta diversity, and relative abundance, as well as on patients with CC whose microbiota had been analyzed via next-generation sequencing technologies. To assess the risk of bias (RoB), we utilized the Newcastle‒Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) and the ROBINS-I tool. For the meta-analysis, we employed Review Manager 5.4.
Results: Thirty-six eligible studies were included in this review. The Chao1 index (SMD = 0.96, [95% CI: 0.71, 1.21], I2 = 0%) and the Shannon index (SMD = 1.02, [95% CI: 0.53, 1.50], I2 = 85%) values from vaginal samples were significantly greater in patients than in the controls. In the cervical samples, the Shannon index value (SMD = 1.29, [95% CI: 0.61, 1.97], I2 = 93%) significantly increased, whereas the Chao1 index value did not significantly differ (SMD = 0.50, [95% CI: -0.46, 1.46], I2 = 89%). The Shannon index value (SMD = 0.25, [95% CI: -0.22, 0.72], I2 = 38%) did not significantly differ across the gut samples. The majority of studies (19/25) indicated that the patients and noncancer controls differed significantly in terms of beta diversity. Cancer-associated changes were observed, with a dramatic decrease in the Lactobacillus genus and significant increases in pathogenic bacteria, including the Anaerococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Porphyromonas, Prevotella, and Sneathia genera. Additionally, the impact of antineoplastic therapies on microbial diversity was inconsistently reported across several studies.
Conclusion: This systematic review elucidates the microbiota alterations associated with the prevalence of CC and its response to anti-tumor therapies, aiming to provide insights for future research directions and precision medicine strategies to enhance women's quality of life.
期刊介绍:
BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.