IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1177/19417381251316251
Samantha Searles, James Hood, Morgan Wood, Marissa Bello, JohnEric Smith, Zachary Gillen
{"title":"Sex-Based Comparisons of Hamstrings-to-Quadriceps Ratio Across the Velocity Spectrum.","authors":"Samantha Searles, James Hood, Morgan Wood, Marissa Bello, JohnEric Smith, Zachary Gillen","doi":"10.1177/19417381251316251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women are typically more prone to knee injuries than men, possibly due to poorer hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio (HTQ), particularly during fast velocity movements.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Men would have greater HTQ across velocity than women.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ultrasound images quantified quadriceps and hamstrings muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) in 27 study participants (14 women, age, 24 ± 4 years; 13 men, age, 25 ± 6 years). Peak torque (PT) was taken from maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) and isokinetic leg extension and flexion contractions from 60° to 300° s<sup>-1</sup>. Independent samples <i>t</i>-tests examined differences in CSA and HTQ from CSA. Mixed-factorial ANOVAs examined differences in PT and HTQ from PT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Men had larger CSA and PT than women for leg extension and flexion across velocity (<i>P</i> < .01). There were no sex-based differences in the HTQ from CSA or PT across velocity (<i>P</i> ≥ .11). For both groups, leg extension PT decreased from MVIC to 300° s<sup>-1</sup> (<i>P</i> ≤ .04). For women, leg flexion PT was the same from MVIC to 60° s<sup>-1</sup> (<i>P</i> > .98), decreased from 60° to 180° s<sup>-1</sup> (<i>P</i> < .01), and plateaued from 180° to 300° s<sup>-1</sup> (<i>P</i> ≥ .07). For men, leg flexion PT decreased from MVIC to 300° s<sup>-1</sup> (<i>P</i> ≤ .03). For both groups, HTQ increased from MVIC to 60° s<sup>-1</sup> (<i>P</i> < .01), then plateaued from 60° to 300° s<sup>-1</sup> (<i>P</i> > .98).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both groups had similar patterns of response for leg extension PT and HTQ across velocity, with no sex-based differences for HTQ. Factors other than HTQ may account for the potential sex-based difference in knee injury risk.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Increased knee injury predisposition for women compared with men may be due to neuromuscular control or anatomy rather than HTQ.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"19417381251316251"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251316251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:女性通常比男性更容易发生膝关节损伤,这可能是由于腘绳肌与股四头肌的比例(HTQ)较差,尤其是在快速运动时:研究设计:横断面研究:研究设计:横断面研究。证据等级:2:超声波图像量化了 27 名研究参与者(14 名女性,年龄为 24 ± 4 岁;13 名男性,年龄为 25 ± 6 岁)的股四头肌和腿肌横截面积(CSA)。峰值扭矩(PT)取自最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)和60°至300° s-1等速腿部伸屈收缩。独立样本 t 检验检查了 CSA 和 HTQ 与 CSA 的差异。混合因子方差分析检验了 PT 和来自 PT 的 HTQ 的差异:结果:在不同速度下,男性腿部伸展和弯曲的 CSA 和 PT 均大于女性(P < .01)。不同速度下,CSA 和 PT 的 HTQ 没有性别差异(P ≥ .11)。对于两个组别,腿部伸展 PT 从 MVIC 到 300° s-1 都有所下降(P ≤ .04)。对于女性,腿部屈曲 PT 值从 MVIC 到 60° s-1 相同(P > .98),从 60° 到 180° s-1 下降(P < .01),从 180° 到 300° s-1 趋于稳定(P ≥ .07)。男性的腿部屈曲 PT 从 MVIC 下降到 300° s-1(P ≤ .03)。两组的 HTQ 均从 MVIC 到 60° s-1 增加(P < .01),然后从 60° s-1 到 300° s-1 趋于平稳(P > .98):结论:两组在不同速度下的伸腿 PT 和 HTQ 反应模式相似,HTQ 没有性别差异。除 HTQ 外,其他因素也可能导致膝关节损伤风险的潜在性别差异:临床相关性:与男性相比,女性膝关节易受伤的原因可能与神经肌肉控制或解剖结构有关,而非 HTQ。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex-Based Comparisons of Hamstrings-to-Quadriceps Ratio Across the Velocity Spectrum.

Background: Women are typically more prone to knee injuries than men, possibly due to poorer hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio (HTQ), particularly during fast velocity movements.

Hypothesis: Men would have greater HTQ across velocity than women.

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Level of evidence: 2.

Methods: Ultrasound images quantified quadriceps and hamstrings muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) in 27 study participants (14 women, age, 24 ± 4 years; 13 men, age, 25 ± 6 years). Peak torque (PT) was taken from maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) and isokinetic leg extension and flexion contractions from 60° to 300° s-1. Independent samples t-tests examined differences in CSA and HTQ from CSA. Mixed-factorial ANOVAs examined differences in PT and HTQ from PT.

Results: Men had larger CSA and PT than women for leg extension and flexion across velocity (P < .01). There were no sex-based differences in the HTQ from CSA or PT across velocity (P ≥ .11). For both groups, leg extension PT decreased from MVIC to 300° s-1 (P ≤ .04). For women, leg flexion PT was the same from MVIC to 60° s-1 (P > .98), decreased from 60° to 180° s-1 (P < .01), and plateaued from 180° to 300° s-1 (P ≥ .07). For men, leg flexion PT decreased from MVIC to 300° s-1 (P ≤ .03). For both groups, HTQ increased from MVIC to 60° s-1 (P < .01), then plateaued from 60° to 300° s-1 (P > .98).

Conclusion: Both groups had similar patterns of response for leg extension PT and HTQ across velocity, with no sex-based differences for HTQ. Factors other than HTQ may account for the potential sex-based difference in knee injury risk.

Clinical relevance: Increased knee injury predisposition for women compared with men may be due to neuromuscular control or anatomy rather than HTQ.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
期刊最新文献
Sex Differences in Quadriceps Atrophy After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear. Favorable Clinical Outcomes After Humeral Head Depressor Muscle Coactivation Training With EMG for Patients With Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Effects of Eccentric Versus Concentric Strengthening in Patients With Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Relationship Between Running Biomechanics and Core Temperature Across a Competitive Road Race. Subjective Causes for Failure to Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1