卢梭的第二话语与社会契约:对既定观点的挑战

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1111/1754-0208.12974
Andreas Beck Holm
{"title":"卢梭的第二话语与社会契约:对既定观点的挑战","authors":"Andreas Beck Holm","doi":"10.1111/1754-0208.12974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>According to conventional wisdom, Rousseau's two key texts, the <i>Second Discourse</i> and the <i>Social Contract</i>, are tied together as question and answer. This is the view that is challenged in the present article. It is demonstrated how the <i>Social Contract</i> cannot, in fact, be more than a partial solution to the problems defined by the <i>Second Discourse</i>, and it is pointed out how Rousseau's <i>Project for Corsica</i> is a far more plausible answer to the challenges presented by him in the earlier work. This conclusion has significant consequences for our understanding of Rousseau's political philosophy in general, as well as his position in relation to later theoretical currents in political philosophy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55946,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"29-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rousseau's Second Discourse and Social Contract: Challenging the Received View\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Beck Holm\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-0208.12974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>According to conventional wisdom, Rousseau's two key texts, the <i>Second Discourse</i> and the <i>Social Contract</i>, are tied together as question and answer. This is the view that is challenged in the present article. It is demonstrated how the <i>Social Contract</i> cannot, in fact, be more than a partial solution to the problems defined by the <i>Second Discourse</i>, and it is pointed out how Rousseau's <i>Project for Corsica</i> is a far more plausible answer to the challenges presented by him in the earlier work. This conclusion has significant consequences for our understanding of Rousseau's political philosophy in general, as well as his position in relation to later theoretical currents in political philosophy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"29-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-0208.12974\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-0208.12974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据传统智慧,卢梭的两个关键文本,《第二论述》和《社会契约论》,是作为问题和答案联系在一起的。这就是本文所要挑战的观点。本文论证了社会契约论实际上如何不能成为第二篇论述中所定义的问题的部分解决方案,并指出卢梭的科西嘉计划如何成为他在早期工作中提出的挑战的更合理的答案。这一结论对我们理解卢梭的政治哲学,以及他与后来政治哲学理论潮流的关系有着重要的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rousseau's Second Discourse and Social Contract: Challenging the Received View

According to conventional wisdom, Rousseau's two key texts, the Second Discourse and the Social Contract, are tied together as question and answer. This is the view that is challenged in the present article. It is demonstrated how the Social Contract cannot, in fact, be more than a partial solution to the problems defined by the Second Discourse, and it is pointed out how Rousseau's Project for Corsica is a far more plausible answer to the challenges presented by him in the earlier work. This conclusion has significant consequences for our understanding of Rousseau's political philosophy in general, as well as his position in relation to later theoretical currents in political philosophy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1