现场ERCP可用性与胆管炎结局:回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.3 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-01-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2494-7333
Rishad Khan, Kayley-Jasmin Marchena-Romero, Marwa F Ismail, Surain B Roberts, Nikko Gimpaya, Michael A Scaffidi, Nasruddin Sabrie, Kareem Khalaf, Jeffrey Mosko, Paul James, Nauzer Forbes, Fahad Razak, Amol A Verma, Samir C Grover
{"title":"现场ERCP可用性与胆管炎结局:回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Rishad Khan, Kayley-Jasmin Marchena-Romero, Marwa F Ismail, Surain B Roberts, Nikko Gimpaya, Michael A Scaffidi, Nasruddin Sabrie, Kareem Khalaf, Jeffrey Mosko, Paul James, Nauzer Forbes, Fahad Razak, Amol A Verma, Samir C Grover","doi":"10.1055/a-2494-7333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is important in acute cholangitis (AC) management but is not available at all hospitals. The association between on-site ERCP availability and cholangitis outcomes is unknown.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We included adults diagnosed with AC at 27 hospitals in Ontario through the GEMINI network. We collected data on demographics, clinical and laboratory values, and interventions. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, readmission rates, and requirement for percutaneous or surgical decompression. We used multivariable regression analyses to assess the impact of on-site ERCP availability on the primary and secondary outcomes with adjustment for relevant variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 4492 patients with a median age of 75. Patients at ERCP sites had higher unadjusted rates of undergoing ERCP (55.7% at ERCP sites, 40.8% at non-ERCP sites). Patients at ERCP sites compared with non-ERCP sites did not have significantly different in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86-5.55). Compared with non-ERCP sites, patients at ERCP sites with underlying stricturing biliary disease or pancreaticobiliary malignancy (aOR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.14-13.58) or severe cholangitis (aOR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.17-4.02) had higher odds of in-hospital mortality. In a post-hoc propensity score-based analysis, there was no significant difference between patients at ERCP sites compared with those at non-ERCP sites for in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients at ERCP sites compared with non-ERCP sites did not have significantly different mortality. Subgroups of patients with underlying stricturing biliary disease or pancreaticobiliary malignancy and severe cholangitis, who have higher mortality at ERCP sites, warrant further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a24947333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On-site ERCP availability and cholangitis outcomes: Retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Rishad Khan, Kayley-Jasmin Marchena-Romero, Marwa F Ismail, Surain B Roberts, Nikko Gimpaya, Michael A Scaffidi, Nasruddin Sabrie, Kareem Khalaf, Jeffrey Mosko, Paul James, Nauzer Forbes, Fahad Razak, Amol A Verma, Samir C Grover\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2494-7333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is important in acute cholangitis (AC) management but is not available at all hospitals. The association between on-site ERCP availability and cholangitis outcomes is unknown.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We included adults diagnosed with AC at 27 hospitals in Ontario through the GEMINI network. We collected data on demographics, clinical and laboratory values, and interventions. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, readmission rates, and requirement for percutaneous or surgical decompression. We used multivariable regression analyses to assess the impact of on-site ERCP availability on the primary and secondary outcomes with adjustment for relevant variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 4492 patients with a median age of 75. Patients at ERCP sites had higher unadjusted rates of undergoing ERCP (55.7% at ERCP sites, 40.8% at non-ERCP sites). Patients at ERCP sites compared with non-ERCP sites did not have significantly different in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86-5.55). Compared with non-ERCP sites, patients at ERCP sites with underlying stricturing biliary disease or pancreaticobiliary malignancy (aOR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.14-13.58) or severe cholangitis (aOR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.17-4.02) had higher odds of in-hospital mortality. In a post-hoc propensity score-based analysis, there was no significant difference between patients at ERCP sites compared with those at non-ERCP sites for in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients at ERCP sites compared with non-ERCP sites did not have significantly different mortality. Subgroups of patients with underlying stricturing biliary disease or pancreaticobiliary malignancy and severe cholangitis, who have higher mortality at ERCP sites, warrant further study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"a24947333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827753/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2494-7333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2494-7333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的:内镜逆行胆管造影术(ERCP)在急性胆管炎(AC)治疗中很重要,但并非所有医院都有。现场ERCP可用性与胆管炎结局之间的关系尚不清楚。患者和方法:我们通过GEMINI网络纳入了安大略省27家医院诊断为AC的成年人。我们收集了人口统计学、临床和实验室价值以及干预措施方面的数据。主要终点是住院死亡率。次要结果为住院时间、重症监护病房(ICU)入院、再入院率和经皮或手术减压的要求。我们使用多变量回归分析来评估现场ERCP可用性对主要和次要结局的影响,并对相关变量进行调整。结果:我们的队列包括4492例患者,中位年龄为75岁。ERCP部位的患者接受ERCP的未调整率更高(ERCP部位55.7%,非ERCP部位40.8%)。发生ERCP的患者与未发生ERCP的患者相比,住院死亡率无显著差异(校正优势比[aOR] = 2.19, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.86-5.55)。与非ERCP部位相比,ERCP部位合并基础狭窄性胆道疾病或胰胆道恶性肿瘤(aOR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.14-13.58)或严重胆管炎(aOR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.17-4.02)的患者住院死亡率更高。在一项基于事后倾向评分的分析中,ERCP站点的患者与非ERCP站点的患者在住院死亡率方面没有显著差异。结论:发生ERCP部位的患者与非ERCP部位的患者死亡率无显著差异。潜在狭窄性胆道疾病或胰胆管恶性肿瘤和严重胆管炎患者亚组在ERCP部位有较高的死亡率,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On-site ERCP availability and cholangitis outcomes: Retrospective cohort study.

Background and study aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is important in acute cholangitis (AC) management but is not available at all hospitals. The association between on-site ERCP availability and cholangitis outcomes is unknown.

Patients and methods: We included adults diagnosed with AC at 27 hospitals in Ontario through the GEMINI network. We collected data on demographics, clinical and laboratory values, and interventions. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, readmission rates, and requirement for percutaneous or surgical decompression. We used multivariable regression analyses to assess the impact of on-site ERCP availability on the primary and secondary outcomes with adjustment for relevant variables.

Results: Our cohort included 4492 patients with a median age of 75. Patients at ERCP sites had higher unadjusted rates of undergoing ERCP (55.7% at ERCP sites, 40.8% at non-ERCP sites). Patients at ERCP sites compared with non-ERCP sites did not have significantly different in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86-5.55). Compared with non-ERCP sites, patients at ERCP sites with underlying stricturing biliary disease or pancreaticobiliary malignancy (aOR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.14-13.58) or severe cholangitis (aOR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.17-4.02) had higher odds of in-hospital mortality. In a post-hoc propensity score-based analysis, there was no significant difference between patients at ERCP sites compared with those at non-ERCP sites for in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions: Patients at ERCP sites compared with non-ERCP sites did not have significantly different mortality. Subgroups of patients with underlying stricturing biliary disease or pancreaticobiliary malignancy and severe cholangitis, who have higher mortality at ERCP sites, warrant further study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
Exploratory evaluation of magnetic capsule endoscopy with detachable-string for detecting esophageal lesions including early squamous cell carcinoma. Perioperative low molecular weight heparin bridging in aortic mechanical heart valve patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. Use of rebamipide solution as a submucosal injection material to prevent esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: Animal study. Quantitative mechanical profiling of 12 ERCP guidewires: Toward evidence-based device selection. EUS-HGS with antegrade stenting vs. hepaticogastrostomy alone for malignant biliary drainage: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1