通过使用政策捆绑来理解大麻合法化的影响:一项关于青少年心理健康的研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Substance Use & Misuse Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1080/10826084.2025.2466208
Shazib Altaf, Daniel J Mallinson, Mingean Park, Lilliard E Richardson
{"title":"通过使用政策捆绑来理解大麻合法化的影响:一项关于青少年心理健康的研究。","authors":"Shazib Altaf, Daniel J Mallinson, Mingean Park, Lilliard E Richardson","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2025.2466208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Variation in policy design presents a challenge for understanding the positive and negative externalities of cannabis legalization. We offer an advancement on measuring state cannabis policy variation - policy bundles - and demonstrate how the measure can be used to test the effects of cannabis legalization on youth mental health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research employs data from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The research focuses on utilizing three policy bundles as main exposures. This study utilizes a logistic regression model to analyze the outcome exposures. Furthermore, we employ instrumental variables to solve endogeneity between cannabis use and mental health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the pharmaceutical and permissive policy bundle scales are associated with mental health improvements, whereas greater fiscalization has a negative impact on mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Studies of the positive and negative externalities of cannabis legalization must consider variation in policy design.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"915-925"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adding Nuance to Understanding the Effects of Cannabis Legalization by Using Policy Bundles: A Study of Youth Mental Health.\",\"authors\":\"Shazib Altaf, Daniel J Mallinson, Mingean Park, Lilliard E Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10826084.2025.2466208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Variation in policy design presents a challenge for understanding the positive and negative externalities of cannabis legalization. We offer an advancement on measuring state cannabis policy variation - policy bundles - and demonstrate how the measure can be used to test the effects of cannabis legalization on youth mental health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research employs data from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The research focuses on utilizing three policy bundles as main exposures. This study utilizes a logistic regression model to analyze the outcome exposures. Furthermore, we employ instrumental variables to solve endogeneity between cannabis use and mental health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the pharmaceutical and permissive policy bundle scales are associated with mental health improvements, whereas greater fiscalization has a negative impact on mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Studies of the positive and negative externalities of cannabis legalization must consider variation in policy design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"915-925\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2025.2466208\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2025.2466208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:政策设计的变化对理解大麻合法化的积极和消极外部性提出了挑战。我们提供了衡量各州大麻政策差异的进展- -政策捆绑- -并展示了如何使用该措施来测试大麻合法化对青少年心理健康的影响。方法:本研究采用美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)发布的青少年危险行为调查(YRBS)数据。本研究的重点是利用三个政策包作为主要风险敞口。本研究采用逻辑回归模型分析结果暴露。此外,我们采用工具变量来解决大麻使用和心理健康之间的内生性。结果:药物和宽松政策束量表都与心理健康改善有关,而财政化对心理健康有负面影响。结论:研究大麻合法化的正面和负面外部性必须考虑政策设计的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adding Nuance to Understanding the Effects of Cannabis Legalization by Using Policy Bundles: A Study of Youth Mental Health.

Background: Variation in policy design presents a challenge for understanding the positive and negative externalities of cannabis legalization. We offer an advancement on measuring state cannabis policy variation - policy bundles - and demonstrate how the measure can be used to test the effects of cannabis legalization on youth mental health.

Methods: This research employs data from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The research focuses on utilizing three policy bundles as main exposures. This study utilizes a logistic regression model to analyze the outcome exposures. Furthermore, we employ instrumental variables to solve endogeneity between cannabis use and mental health.

Results: Both the pharmaceutical and permissive policy bundle scales are associated with mental health improvements, whereas greater fiscalization has a negative impact on mental health.

Conclusion: Studies of the positive and negative externalities of cannabis legalization must consider variation in policy design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Addiction and Mental Health Symptoms in Inpatient Programming. Adapting the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale to Assess Recovery Identity: Results from a Study of Collegiate Recovery Students in North America. Oral Nicotine Product Use in Emerging Adults: Intersection with Sociodemographics, Other Nicotine Use, Withdrawal, and Dependence. Characterizing Current Nicotine Pouch Use Overall and to Attempt Quitting Tobacco and E-Cigarettes: Analysis of the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Wave 7 (2022-2023). Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Opioid Agonist Treatment Receipt and Retention at an Integrated Safety-Net Health System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1