Fanzhen Mao, Xiangzhen Xu, Feng Tang, Bixian Ni, Qiang Zhang, Jiayao Zhang, Yaobao Liu, You Li, Jun Cao
{"title":"揭示中国私立和公立幼儿园在蛲虫感染风险方面的差异:一项多中心横断面研究。","authors":"Fanzhen Mao, Xiangzhen Xu, Feng Tang, Bixian Ni, Qiang Zhang, Jiayao Zhang, Yaobao Liu, You Li, Jun Cao","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-21883-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In China, public preschools only admit children from local permanent resident families, differing from private preschools admitting children mostly from transient population families such as work migrants. Thus, this study aims to compare pinworm infection rate and its risk factors between private and public preschools to contribute to the limited understanding of the disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-year cross-sectional study was conducted in Jiangsu Province, China from 2019 to 2021. In each study site, two preschools types were selected: private preschool and public preschool. Multi-stage cluster sampling was applied. The study sites, preschools, and classes were selected based on convenience and cooperation. The calculated sample size for each preschool was 229. Participants were expected to proportionally distributed across the lower, the middle, and the upper grade to balance the age bracket. Questionnaire surveys were administered to parents with teachers' help. One adhesive cellophane tape swab sample was collected by local health workers from children in the morning at preschool. Single factor and multiple backward logistic regression analysis were conducted to identify the risk factors for pinworm infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study enrolled 3678, 2568, and 2529 preschool children in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. The three-year pooled infection rate was 0.88% (1.46% for private preschool and 0.18% for public preschool). The pinworm infection rates were statistically higher in private preschool children than in public preschool children (2.07% vs. 0.24% in 2019, P-value < 0.001; 0.82% vs. 0.08% in 2020, P-value = 0.014; 1.22% vs. 0.19% in 2021, P-value = 0.008; respectively). Private preschool was a risk factor for pinworm infection (OR = 6.534, 95%CI = 2.523-22.336). Older age and worse hygiene habit were risk factors among private preschool children (OR = 1.476, 95%CI = 1.152-1.911; OR = 1.311, 95%CI = 1.053-1.606). Among public preschool children, a medium or higher family income level was a protective factor for pinworm infection (OR = 0.081, 95%CI = 0.011-0.413).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that private preschool with children mostly from transient population should be prioritized for pinworm control. It is valuable for policymakers and health staff aiming to improve sanitation and reduce pinworm infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"655"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834629/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling the disparities between private and public preschools in the risk for pinworm infections in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Fanzhen Mao, Xiangzhen Xu, Feng Tang, Bixian Ni, Qiang Zhang, Jiayao Zhang, Yaobao Liu, You Li, Jun Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12889-025-21883-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In China, public preschools only admit children from local permanent resident families, differing from private preschools admitting children mostly from transient population families such as work migrants. Thus, this study aims to compare pinworm infection rate and its risk factors between private and public preschools to contribute to the limited understanding of the disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-year cross-sectional study was conducted in Jiangsu Province, China from 2019 to 2021. In each study site, two preschools types were selected: private preschool and public preschool. Multi-stage cluster sampling was applied. The study sites, preschools, and classes were selected based on convenience and cooperation. The calculated sample size for each preschool was 229. Participants were expected to proportionally distributed across the lower, the middle, and the upper grade to balance the age bracket. Questionnaire surveys were administered to parents with teachers' help. One adhesive cellophane tape swab sample was collected by local health workers from children in the morning at preschool. Single factor and multiple backward logistic regression analysis were conducted to identify the risk factors for pinworm infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study enrolled 3678, 2568, and 2529 preschool children in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. The three-year pooled infection rate was 0.88% (1.46% for private preschool and 0.18% for public preschool). The pinworm infection rates were statistically higher in private preschool children than in public preschool children (2.07% vs. 0.24% in 2019, P-value < 0.001; 0.82% vs. 0.08% in 2020, P-value = 0.014; 1.22% vs. 0.19% in 2021, P-value = 0.008; respectively). Private preschool was a risk factor for pinworm infection (OR = 6.534, 95%CI = 2.523-22.336). Older age and worse hygiene habit were risk factors among private preschool children (OR = 1.476, 95%CI = 1.152-1.911; OR = 1.311, 95%CI = 1.053-1.606). Among public preschool children, a medium or higher family income level was a protective factor for pinworm infection (OR = 0.081, 95%CI = 0.011-0.413).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that private preschool with children mostly from transient population should be prioritized for pinworm control. It is valuable for policymakers and health staff aiming to improve sanitation and reduce pinworm infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834629/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21883-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21883-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在中国,公立幼儿园只招收本地常住家庭的孩子,而私立幼儿园主要招收外来务工人员等流动人口家庭的孩子。因此,本研究旨在比较私立和公立幼儿园的蛲虫感染率及其危险因素,以有助于对差异的有限理解。方法:2019 - 2021年在中国江苏省进行为期三年的横断面研究。在每个研究地点,选择了两种幼儿园类型:私立幼儿园和公立幼儿园。采用多阶段整群抽样。研究地点、幼儿园和班级都是根据方便和合作来选择的。每个幼儿园的计算样本量为229。参与者应按比例分布在低年级、中年级和高年级,以平衡年龄组。在教师的帮助下,对家长进行问卷调查。当地卫生工作者上午从学前班的儿童身上采集了一份粘胶玻璃纸胶带拭子样本。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析确定蛲虫感染的危险因素。结果:本研究于2019年、2020年和2021年分别入组了3678名、2568名和2529名学龄前儿童。3年合计感染率为0.88%(民办幼儿园1.46%,公办幼儿园0.18%)。2019年民办学前儿童蛲虫感染率高于公办学前儿童(2.07% vs. 0.24%), p值差异有统计学意义(p值)。结论:以流动人口为主的民办幼儿园应优先防治蛲虫。它对旨在改善卫生条件和减少蛲虫感染的决策者和卫生工作人员很有价值。
Unveiling the disparities between private and public preschools in the risk for pinworm infections in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study.
Background: In China, public preschools only admit children from local permanent resident families, differing from private preschools admitting children mostly from transient population families such as work migrants. Thus, this study aims to compare pinworm infection rate and its risk factors between private and public preschools to contribute to the limited understanding of the disparities.
Methods: A three-year cross-sectional study was conducted in Jiangsu Province, China from 2019 to 2021. In each study site, two preschools types were selected: private preschool and public preschool. Multi-stage cluster sampling was applied. The study sites, preschools, and classes were selected based on convenience and cooperation. The calculated sample size for each preschool was 229. Participants were expected to proportionally distributed across the lower, the middle, and the upper grade to balance the age bracket. Questionnaire surveys were administered to parents with teachers' help. One adhesive cellophane tape swab sample was collected by local health workers from children in the morning at preschool. Single factor and multiple backward logistic regression analysis were conducted to identify the risk factors for pinworm infections.
Results: This study enrolled 3678, 2568, and 2529 preschool children in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. The three-year pooled infection rate was 0.88% (1.46% for private preschool and 0.18% for public preschool). The pinworm infection rates were statistically higher in private preschool children than in public preschool children (2.07% vs. 0.24% in 2019, P-value < 0.001; 0.82% vs. 0.08% in 2020, P-value = 0.014; 1.22% vs. 0.19% in 2021, P-value = 0.008; respectively). Private preschool was a risk factor for pinworm infection (OR = 6.534, 95%CI = 2.523-22.336). Older age and worse hygiene habit were risk factors among private preschool children (OR = 1.476, 95%CI = 1.152-1.911; OR = 1.311, 95%CI = 1.053-1.606). Among public preschool children, a medium or higher family income level was a protective factor for pinworm infection (OR = 0.081, 95%CI = 0.011-0.413).
Conclusion: The results indicate that private preschool with children mostly from transient population should be prioritized for pinworm control. It is valuable for policymakers and health staff aiming to improve sanitation and reduce pinworm infections.
期刊介绍:
BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.