Markus D Schirmer, Kenda Alhadid, Robert W Regenhardt, Natalia S Rost
{"title":"通过有效储备量化急性缺血性脑卒中的脑健康。","authors":"Markus D Schirmer, Kenda Alhadid, Robert W Regenhardt, Natalia S Rost","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000210180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify brain health using a measure of reserve that incorporates pre-existing pathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 2 retrospective ischemic stroke cohorts (GASROS and SALVO) with neuroimaging and 90-day modified Rankin Scores (mRS) available. White matter hyperintensity (WMHv), brain, and intracranial volumes were automatically extracted and brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) calculated. The latent variable effective reserve (eR) was modeled using age, WMHv, and BPF or brain volume in GASROS. Models were compared using Bayes Information Criterion (BIC). The best model's eR estimates were categorized into quartiles and evaluated in SALVO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GASROS included 476 (median age: 65.8; 65.3% male) and SALVO included 43 (median age: 69.2; 62.8% male) patients. Inverse associations between eR and mRS was seen in both models, with brain volume outperforming BPF (path coefficients: -0.67, -0.48, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001; |ΔBIC| = 362). Quartile-based eR stratification in both studies showed a similar inverse trend, with worse outcomes in the low reserve group (mRS ≤2 - highest vs lowest quartile: 85/90% vs 59/45% for GASROS/SALVO).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Expanding the concept of eR, highlights its clinical translational potential. The strong link between higher eR and better outcomes underscores its value as a protective brain health metric.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"104 5","pages":"e210180"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Brain Health in Acute Ischemic Stroke Through Effective Reserve.\",\"authors\":\"Markus D Schirmer, Kenda Alhadid, Robert W Regenhardt, Natalia S Rost\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/WNL.0000000000210180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify brain health using a measure of reserve that incorporates pre-existing pathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 2 retrospective ischemic stroke cohorts (GASROS and SALVO) with neuroimaging and 90-day modified Rankin Scores (mRS) available. White matter hyperintensity (WMHv), brain, and intracranial volumes were automatically extracted and brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) calculated. The latent variable effective reserve (eR) was modeled using age, WMHv, and BPF or brain volume in GASROS. Models were compared using Bayes Information Criterion (BIC). The best model's eR estimates were categorized into quartiles and evaluated in SALVO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GASROS included 476 (median age: 65.8; 65.3% male) and SALVO included 43 (median age: 69.2; 62.8% male) patients. Inverse associations between eR and mRS was seen in both models, with brain volume outperforming BPF (path coefficients: -0.67, -0.48, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001; |ΔBIC| = 362). Quartile-based eR stratification in both studies showed a similar inverse trend, with worse outcomes in the low reserve group (mRS ≤2 - highest vs lowest quartile: 85/90% vs 59/45% for GASROS/SALVO).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Expanding the concept of eR, highlights its clinical translational potential. The strong link between higher eR and better outcomes underscores its value as a protective brain health metric.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology\",\"volume\":\"104 5\",\"pages\":\"e210180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837846/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000210180\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000210180","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:量化脑健康使用储备措施,包括预先存在的病理。方法:我们分析了2个回顾性缺血性卒中队列(GASROS和SALVO)的神经影像学和90天改良Rankin评分(mRS)。自动提取脑白质高强度(WMHv)、脑体积和颅内体积,并计算脑实质分数(BPF)。潜在变量有效储备(eR)使用GASROS的年龄、WMHv和BPF或脑容量来建模。采用贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)对模型进行比较。将最佳模型的eR估计分为四分位数并在SALVO中进行评估。结果:GASROS纳入476例(中位年龄:65.8;65.3%男性),SALVO纳入43例(中位年龄:69.2;62.8%为男性)。在两种模型中,eR和mRS呈负相关,脑容量优于BPF(通径系数分别为-0.67,-0.48;P < 0.001;| Δbic | = 362)。两项研究中基于四分位数的eR分层显示出类似的相反趋势,低储备组的结果更差(mRS≤2 -最高四分位数vs最低四分位数:GASROS/SALVO为85/90% vs 59/45%)。讨论:拓展eR的概念,突出其临床转化潜力。高eR和更好的结果之间的紧密联系强调了它作为保护大脑健康指标的价值。
Quantifying Brain Health in Acute Ischemic Stroke Through Effective Reserve.
Objective: To quantify brain health using a measure of reserve that incorporates pre-existing pathology.
Methods: We analyzed 2 retrospective ischemic stroke cohorts (GASROS and SALVO) with neuroimaging and 90-day modified Rankin Scores (mRS) available. White matter hyperintensity (WMHv), brain, and intracranial volumes were automatically extracted and brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) calculated. The latent variable effective reserve (eR) was modeled using age, WMHv, and BPF or brain volume in GASROS. Models were compared using Bayes Information Criterion (BIC). The best model's eR estimates were categorized into quartiles and evaluated in SALVO.
Results: GASROS included 476 (median age: 65.8; 65.3% male) and SALVO included 43 (median age: 69.2; 62.8% male) patients. Inverse associations between eR and mRS was seen in both models, with brain volume outperforming BPF (path coefficients: -0.67, -0.48, respectively; p < 0.001; |ΔBIC| = 362). Quartile-based eR stratification in both studies showed a similar inverse trend, with worse outcomes in the low reserve group (mRS ≤2 - highest vs lowest quartile: 85/90% vs 59/45% for GASROS/SALVO).
Discussion: Expanding the concept of eR, highlights its clinical translational potential. The strong link between higher eR and better outcomes underscores its value as a protective brain health metric.
期刊介绍:
Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology.
As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content.
Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.