通过有效储备量化急性缺血性脑卒中的脑健康。

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology Pub Date : 2025-03-11 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000210180
Markus D Schirmer, Kenda Alhadid, Robert W Regenhardt, Natalia S Rost
{"title":"通过有效储备量化急性缺血性脑卒中的脑健康。","authors":"Markus D Schirmer, Kenda Alhadid, Robert W Regenhardt, Natalia S Rost","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000210180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify brain health using a measure of reserve that incorporates pre-existing pathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 2 retrospective ischemic stroke cohorts (GASROS and SALVO) with neuroimaging and 90-day modified Rankin Scores (mRS) available. White matter hyperintensity (WMHv), brain, and intracranial volumes were automatically extracted and brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) calculated. The latent variable effective reserve (eR) was modeled using age, WMHv, and BPF or brain volume in GASROS. Models were compared using Bayes Information Criterion (BIC). The best model's eR estimates were categorized into quartiles and evaluated in SALVO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GASROS included 476 (median age: 65.8; 65.3% male) and SALVO included 43 (median age: 69.2; 62.8% male) patients. Inverse associations between eR and mRS was seen in both models, with brain volume outperforming BPF (path coefficients: -0.67, -0.48, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001; |ΔBIC| = 362). Quartile-based eR stratification in both studies showed a similar inverse trend, with worse outcomes in the low reserve group (mRS ≤2 - highest vs lowest quartile: 85/90% vs 59/45% for GASROS/SALVO).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Expanding the concept of eR, highlights its clinical translational potential. The strong link between higher eR and better outcomes underscores its value as a protective brain health metric.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"104 5","pages":"e210180"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Brain Health in Acute Ischemic Stroke Through Effective Reserve.\",\"authors\":\"Markus D Schirmer, Kenda Alhadid, Robert W Regenhardt, Natalia S Rost\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/WNL.0000000000210180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify brain health using a measure of reserve that incorporates pre-existing pathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 2 retrospective ischemic stroke cohorts (GASROS and SALVO) with neuroimaging and 90-day modified Rankin Scores (mRS) available. White matter hyperintensity (WMHv), brain, and intracranial volumes were automatically extracted and brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) calculated. The latent variable effective reserve (eR) was modeled using age, WMHv, and BPF or brain volume in GASROS. Models were compared using Bayes Information Criterion (BIC). The best model's eR estimates were categorized into quartiles and evaluated in SALVO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GASROS included 476 (median age: 65.8; 65.3% male) and SALVO included 43 (median age: 69.2; 62.8% male) patients. Inverse associations between eR and mRS was seen in both models, with brain volume outperforming BPF (path coefficients: -0.67, -0.48, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001; |ΔBIC| = 362). Quartile-based eR stratification in both studies showed a similar inverse trend, with worse outcomes in the low reserve group (mRS ≤2 - highest vs lowest quartile: 85/90% vs 59/45% for GASROS/SALVO).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Expanding the concept of eR, highlights its clinical translational potential. The strong link between higher eR and better outcomes underscores its value as a protective brain health metric.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology\",\"volume\":\"104 5\",\"pages\":\"e210180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837846/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000210180\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000210180","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:量化脑健康使用储备措施,包括预先存在的病理。方法:我们分析了2个回顾性缺血性卒中队列(GASROS和SALVO)的神经影像学和90天改良Rankin评分(mRS)。自动提取脑白质高强度(WMHv)、脑体积和颅内体积,并计算脑实质分数(BPF)。潜在变量有效储备(eR)使用GASROS的年龄、WMHv和BPF或脑容量来建模。采用贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)对模型进行比较。将最佳模型的eR估计分为四分位数并在SALVO中进行评估。结果:GASROS纳入476例(中位年龄:65.8;65.3%男性),SALVO纳入43例(中位年龄:69.2;62.8%为男性)。在两种模型中,eR和mRS呈负相关,脑容量优于BPF(通径系数分别为-0.67,-0.48;P < 0.001;| Δbic | = 362)。两项研究中基于四分位数的eR分层显示出类似的相反趋势,低储备组的结果更差(mRS≤2 -最高四分位数vs最低四分位数:GASROS/SALVO为85/90% vs 59/45%)。讨论:拓展eR的概念,突出其临床转化潜力。高eR和更好的结果之间的紧密联系强调了它作为保护大脑健康指标的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantifying Brain Health in Acute Ischemic Stroke Through Effective Reserve.

Objective: To quantify brain health using a measure of reserve that incorporates pre-existing pathology.

Methods: We analyzed 2 retrospective ischemic stroke cohorts (GASROS and SALVO) with neuroimaging and 90-day modified Rankin Scores (mRS) available. White matter hyperintensity (WMHv), brain, and intracranial volumes were automatically extracted and brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) calculated. The latent variable effective reserve (eR) was modeled using age, WMHv, and BPF or brain volume in GASROS. Models were compared using Bayes Information Criterion (BIC). The best model's eR estimates were categorized into quartiles and evaluated in SALVO.

Results: GASROS included 476 (median age: 65.8; 65.3% male) and SALVO included 43 (median age: 69.2; 62.8% male) patients. Inverse associations between eR and mRS was seen in both models, with brain volume outperforming BPF (path coefficients: -0.67, -0.48, respectively; p < 0.001; |ΔBIC| = 362). Quartile-based eR stratification in both studies showed a similar inverse trend, with worse outcomes in the low reserve group (mRS ≤2 - highest vs lowest quartile: 85/90% vs 59/45% for GASROS/SALVO).

Discussion: Expanding the concept of eR, highlights its clinical translational potential. The strong link between higher eR and better outcomes underscores its value as a protective brain health metric.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Vamorolone for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Cross-Trial Efficacy Comparison With Classic Corticosteroids From the FOR-DMD Trial. Risk of Myasthenia Gravis Exacerbation During Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Nationwide Cohort Study. After I Say I'm Sorry. Pearls & Oy-Sters: Plantar Agraphesthesia in Corticobasal Syndrome. Clinical Reasoning: A 32-Year-Old Woman With Progressive Vision Loss and Confusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1