"简化":一项定性描述研究,探索患者对使用数字健康工具自我管理炎症性肠病的障碍和促进因素的看法。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-02-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848251319807
Lekan Ajibulu, Kaitlyn Delaney Chappell, Cynthia H Seow, Karen J Goodman, Karen Wong
{"title":"\"简化\":一项定性描述研究,探索患者对使用数字健康工具自我管理炎症性肠病的障碍和促进因素的看法。","authors":"Lekan Ajibulu, Kaitlyn Delaney Chappell, Cynthia H Seow, Karen J Goodman, Karen Wong","doi":"10.1177/17562848251319807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic condition requiring lifelong management and frequent interactions with healthcare providers. Digital health tools have the potential to enhance disease management by providing real-time data and improving care coordination. Despite their potential, there is limited evidence on patient perspectives regarding barriers and facilitators to the adoption of these tools.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore patient perspectives on the barriers and facilitators associated with using digital health tools for IBD self-management, focusing on the adoption of a tool called MyIBDToolkit.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study employed a qualitative description approach to gather detailed insights into patient experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with a confirmed IBD diagnosis were recruited from clinics in Alberta, Canada. Data were collected via virtual semi-structured interviews conducted between June and July 2024. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes, and member checking ensured the credibility of the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen interviews were conducted, reaching thematic saturation. Participants viewed MyIBDToolkit as beneficial for enhancing disease monitoring and care coordination. However, concerns about data entry burden, privacy, and engagement emerged as significant barriers. Variability in healthcare provider use of the tool was another critical concern.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While digital health tools such as MyIBDToolkit have the potential to improve IBD self-management, addressing barriers such as usability, privacy, and sustainability is crucial. Incorporating patient feedback during the design process can enhance the effectiveness and acceptability of these tools in chronic disease management.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562848251319807"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Simpleness\\\": a qualitative description study exploring patient perspectives on the barriers and facilitators of using digital health tools to self-manage inflammatory bowel disease.\",\"authors\":\"Lekan Ajibulu, Kaitlyn Delaney Chappell, Cynthia H Seow, Karen J Goodman, Karen Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562848251319807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic condition requiring lifelong management and frequent interactions with healthcare providers. Digital health tools have the potential to enhance disease management by providing real-time data and improving care coordination. Despite their potential, there is limited evidence on patient perspectives regarding barriers and facilitators to the adoption of these tools.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore patient perspectives on the barriers and facilitators associated with using digital health tools for IBD self-management, focusing on the adoption of a tool called MyIBDToolkit.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study employed a qualitative description approach to gather detailed insights into patient experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with a confirmed IBD diagnosis were recruited from clinics in Alberta, Canada. Data were collected via virtual semi-structured interviews conducted between June and July 2024. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes, and member checking ensured the credibility of the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen interviews were conducted, reaching thematic saturation. Participants viewed MyIBDToolkit as beneficial for enhancing disease monitoring and care coordination. However, concerns about data entry burden, privacy, and engagement emerged as significant barriers. Variability in healthcare provider use of the tool was another critical concern.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While digital health tools such as MyIBDToolkit have the potential to improve IBD self-management, addressing barriers such as usability, privacy, and sustainability is crucial. Incorporating patient feedback during the design process can enhance the effectiveness and acceptability of these tools in chronic disease management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"17562848251319807\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831630/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848251319807\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848251319807","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Simpleness": a qualitative description study exploring patient perspectives on the barriers and facilitators of using digital health tools to self-manage inflammatory bowel disease.

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic condition requiring lifelong management and frequent interactions with healthcare providers. Digital health tools have the potential to enhance disease management by providing real-time data and improving care coordination. Despite their potential, there is limited evidence on patient perspectives regarding barriers and facilitators to the adoption of these tools.

Objectives: To explore patient perspectives on the barriers and facilitators associated with using digital health tools for IBD self-management, focusing on the adoption of a tool called MyIBDToolkit.

Design: This study employed a qualitative description approach to gather detailed insights into patient experiences.

Methods: Participants with a confirmed IBD diagnosis were recruited from clinics in Alberta, Canada. Data were collected via virtual semi-structured interviews conducted between June and July 2024. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes, and member checking ensured the credibility of the findings.

Results: Eighteen interviews were conducted, reaching thematic saturation. Participants viewed MyIBDToolkit as beneficial for enhancing disease monitoring and care coordination. However, concerns about data entry burden, privacy, and engagement emerged as significant barriers. Variability in healthcare provider use of the tool was another critical concern.

Conclusion: While digital health tools such as MyIBDToolkit have the potential to improve IBD self-management, addressing barriers such as usability, privacy, and sustainability is crucial. Incorporating patient feedback during the design process can enhance the effectiveness and acceptability of these tools in chronic disease management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Quality of life and burden of disease in a Mexican population with inflammatory bowel disease: an analysis of the RISE-MX trial. Association of early therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab with biologic remission and drug survival in Crohn's Disease. Clipping closure length is a crucial factor for delayed bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. OLGA and OLGIM staging systems on the risk assessment of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta‑analysis of prospective cohorts. Therapeutic potential of fecal microbiota transplantation in colorectal cancer based on gut microbiota regulation: from pathogenesis to efficacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1